As to your justification, I disagree. Had the hierarchy permitted indult priests to disagree and speak out against errors they perceive in V2, the justification for SSPX and Resistance parishes would not be there IMO. The point is resistance to error and access to the means of salvation and tradition: if the hierarchy permits resistance, and access to the traditional sacraments, there is no need to resist in a divided and separated entity of Resistance, resistance already available without the rent of division.

Hello DR-

Some more thoughts:

1) Regarding your hypothetical, why would the hierarchy permit resistance to itself??  The reality is that on the one hand, they have censured those who have attempted to, and on the other hand, instituted controlled opposition to reintegrate former resisters (as mentioned in my previous post).  It would be like inviting burglars into your home.  This is what makes the delusion of converting from within a naive pipedream (+Fellay/Rossiniere).

2) Lefebvre did not say it was a strict duty to remain independent of the conciliar church for so long as they refuse to let us criticize it.  He said it was a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as it does not rediscover the tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.

In other words, it is a different (conciliar) religion, and one cannot join a conciliar church without leaving the Catholic Church. 

By all means, resist, condemn in season and out of season, but for so long as this counterfeit religion (with its counterfeit rites, catechisms, morals, canon law, etc.) remains, it places souls in grave spiritual necessity, and separation will be necessary to keep and protect the faith and avoid contamination, or slowly, slowly one will lose it (exactly as Cardinal Cottier/Rome have desired).

Which is all another way of saying souls are still in necessity, whether preaching/teaching against errors is permitted or not, and it is that necessity which compels independence from those who perceive the threat.

Matthew blocks links to their site now

I use tinyurl for a number of reasons.  Many links break due to the various word-substitution algorithms in place also.

As for being able to deal with the emergency by going to Indult / Motu Masses, it's absolutely clear that there would never have been an Indul Mass, Motu Mass, an FSSP, etc. ... had it not been for Archbishop Lefebvre's formation of the SSPX.  If everyone returned to the Motu Masses (of course, Bergoglio is in the process of banning them), and the Traditional Mass centers faded away, Rome would pull the plug completely on them.

Anyone can say what they will about +Williamson, but what no man can take from him is the laurel of honor for having saved the greater part of Tradition from conciliar capture.

That should never be forgotten.

https://schismatic-home-aloner.com/fr-denis-fahey/

Perhaps the schismatic-home-aloner.com site of the Dimonds has been hacked or something.

**** or its something on cathinfo that prevents links to the Dimonds

https://schismatic-home-aloner.com

testing 

I use tinyurl for a number of reasons.  Many links break due to the various word-substitution algorithms in place also.

I wouldn't lump together using tinyurl to avoid an unintended problem and using it to dodge something that's obviously intentional.

Here's an example of something that might be useful to people (on the same subject as the link that started this discussion) ...
http://www.traditio.com/fah.htm

As I said, I can't stand Traditio's positions and attitudes, but it wouldn't stop me from posting this link.  I don't agree with a lot of what Father Cekada wrote, but that wouldn't stop me from posting some of the stuff that's really good ... etc., etc.