Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics  (Read 8780 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

Re: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics
« Reply #65 on: January 14, 2023, 08:59:17 AM »
Fradd had said before this interview that he was going to ask Salza where the Latin Mass would be today without all of these "schismatics". Did that question get asked / answered?

A good question. 

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics
« Reply #66 on: January 14, 2023, 09:01:04 AM »
Meg, the remake Ladislaus made about being a dogmatic sedevacantist was about himself, not Salza.

Right.  Sorry if I didn't articulate that properly.  I meant to correct that earlier but then it slipped my mind.


Offline Sneedevacantist

  • Supporter
Re: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics
« Reply #67 on: January 14, 2023, 04:56:15 PM »
That's because they hold to a Calvinistic morality. They and their flock are the Elect, and everyone else is a hell-bound reprobate. If you go against MHFM, you are going against God. Just like Calvin when he ran Geneva.
Well put, their viewpoint always struck me as being some sort of neo-Calvinist view regarding the elect. They do come across as cultish, especially if you read the comments on their videos and online posts from their followers. I like a lot of their content (especially since their material got me started on my journey to Catholicism), but sadly they are not without issues.

Re: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics
« Reply #68 on: January 14, 2023, 05:07:14 PM »
Salza should be worried by the sodomites.  He don’t mention them.
There are many divorced remarried within Vatican II too.  



Re: Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics
« Reply #69 on: January 14, 2023, 05:31:55 PM »
It seems that trads are not the only ones with issues with some of Mr. Siscoe/Mr. Salza's positions.

In this article, Ron Conte takes issue with their stance on papal deposition:

https://ronconte.com/2021/08/26/a-refutation-of-siscoe-and-salzas-article-on-deposing-the-pope/

This was the reply of Siscoe/Salza:

http://www.trueorfalsepope.com/p/ron-contes-errors-on-vatican-i-and_16.html