I love this picture and its unique perspective and have a large print of it in my home, but for the past few months, it has bothered me that there are no wounds ( or nails) in Jesus' hands and feet, no INRI or anything written on the posting above His head and no Crown of Thorns. I know this is an artist's representation and Dali was a surrealist, but I wouldn't want to dishonor Our Lord's image in any way.
Also , I have seen Dali's photo when he was in attendance at one of those "eyes wide shut" Illuminati parties in the '70's. I know Caravaggio was a criminal and possibly a murderer but I consider him the greatest artist of all in his depictions of the life of Christ -so I am conflicted.
Should I get rid of this print or am I being too scrupulous?

I wouldn't put it in your home sanctuary or altar, or pray over it.  But I wouldn't throw it out, keep it in a bedroom or hallway.  I like Dali even though I hate modern art. I would consider surrealism to be modern art, but Dali most likely from his Catholic culture seems to have a certain element that is decent (in most paintings, some are trash).  

...it has bothered me that there are no wounds (or nails) in Jesus' hands and feet, no INRI or anything written on the posting above His head and no Crown of Thorns.

Should I get rid of this print or am I being too scrupulous?

.
You can very easily add nails, blood, crown of thorns, INRI, and some scourging scars, all of which are missing.
(BTW it's not overly scrupulous to realize that without the INRI and the nails and the crown of thorns, it's not a crucifix.)
.
But that's not going to resolve the basic problem with this work.
.
IOW it is a distortion of the truth, and it evokes an inappropriate appetite in the viewer - to be overly imaginative regarding this.
.
There is already far too much incomprehensibility for us regarding the REAL Crucifixion, we don't need whacko distortions.
.
Pick up a copy of St. John of the Cross's works on the Crucifixion of Our Lord, but I have to warn you:
.
I know people who have been so entirely consumed by his writings they find they can hardly think of anything else.
.
But one thing is for sure: I've never met one who admires St. John's works who also admires this picture you have on the wall.

It looks like the cross has a kink.

I would burn it.

.
I have an example that might seem to be off-topic, but I don't think it is.
I knew a boy who took an art class at a Catholic high school in the early 70's.
It was a school run by the Salesians of Don Bosco.
There was an assignment to make a casting of some design in concrete to make a stepping stone, effectively.
No specifications were given except the physical dimensions, it was something like 15 inches square by 4 thick.
So this one boy, who was slightly light in the loafers so to speak, came up with this design that had half the face of 

.
I have an example that might seem to be off-topic, but I don't think it is.
I knew a boy who took an art class at a Catholic high school in the early 70's.
It was a school run by the Salesians of Don Bosco.
There was an assignment to make a casting of some design in concrete to make a stepping stone, effectively.
No specifications were given except the physical dimensions, it was something like 15 inches square by 4 thick.
So this one boy, who was slightly light in the loafers so to speak, came up with this design that had half the face of

David Bowie                                      

on the top, kind of facing downward                                  

not unlike this Dali crucifixion image does                                

but with the key feature of a single tear under one eye, falling                              

Kind of like this:                                    

                               

.

Salesian brothers ran the class.

The boy watched them for their reaction when he turned in the project.

Later, I heard him describe with pride how the brothers' look at "that tear" was worth a million bucks.

.

The point is, ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs get a big thrill out of shocking people with their oddities.

The teardrop thing is interesting; I found this:

7. Teardrop

One of the most common criminal tattoos is the teardrop underneath the eye, think Lil Wayne.
The most widely accepted meaning of the teardrop is the wearer has killed someone. The teardrop can also mean that the wearer is mourning the loss of a family member. A clear teardrop, like the one pictured, can mean that the wearer has committed an attempted murder, or alternatively, that a close friend or family member was killed and the wearer is seeking revenge.


Read more: http://www.realclear.com/offbeat/2014/07/24/7_most_notorious_prison_tattoos_what_they_mean_8023.html#ixzz5OxvgmN6Y


and this:

"The teardrop tattoo or tear tattoo is a symbolic tattoo of a tear that is placed underneath the eye. The teardrop is one of the most widely recognised prison tattoos^[1] and has various meanings.
It can signify that the wearer has spent time in prison;^[2] or more specifically that the wearer was raped while incarcerated and tattooed by the rapist as a "property" mark and for humiliation, since facial tattoos cannot be concealed.^[3][4]
It can acknowledge the loss of a family or fellow gang member;^[5] the tattoo is sometimes worn by the female companions of prisoners in solidarity with their loved ones.^[6] Amy Winehouse had a teardrop tattooed to mark her distress at husband Blake Fielder-Civil remaining on remand at Pentonville Prison.^[7] US rappers The Game and Lil Wayne have teardrop tattoos signifying the death of friends,^[8][7] and basketball player Amar'e Stoudemire has had a teardrop tattoo since 2012 honoring his older brother Hazell Jr., who died in a car accident.^[9]
In some cases, it may signify that the wearer has killed someone.^[10] Sometimes the exact meaning of the tattoo is only known by the wearer.^[5][11] The tattoo's meaning also can change depending on whether the tear is empty or is filled with ink.^{[10]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teardrop_tattoo} 

I don't know if it is just me, but I sense something repulsive about it.

I think it is ugly and do not like it.

I don't know if you can explain this statement in another way , but I don't get it. Isn't the Corpus supposed to be hanging vertically from the horizontal cross beam? Isn't that correct?
I'm obviously not seeing what you are, but I'd like to understand.

.
I didn't want to duplicate the OP's image again since it's already seen twice on this first page.
But since you're the author, you're the one with this picture hanging in your home.
So you ought to know what it looks like.
Do you mean to say that in all the times you've seen it you didn't realize it was facing downward?
.
The crossbeam of a crucifix is always horizontal (unless some modern wise guy shows it otherwise).
But the Dali image has the front face of the crossbeam facing downwards.
As in down -- down to earth? Terrestrial (maybe Jesus was not terrestrial)? Toward the underworld?
.
It's just weird.
What would you think if the priest during Benediction bent over to face the floor with the monstrance?
Do you understand yet?
.
There is a known fact in post-Dali sculpture (if you could call it that) where the crucifix (as it were) faced downward.
It was used at a big outdoor "mass" with JPII at the helm, in Italy.
Then the cross (wasn't really a crucifix, had no INRI) was moved to a public park.
Some years later, while a large group of children gathered under it, it fell down.
One disabled man wasn't quick enough to run away so he got crushed to death.
.
Maybe you remember the story?
.
April 24th, 2014, 9 years after JPII died, a huge cross erected in a public park bearing the name of JPII, fell down killing a man.
Perhaps this should tell the world that God doesn't approve of crosses facing the ground, or of the so-called canonization of JPII?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/24/john-paul-ii-crucifix-kills-man_n_5206712.html

Just two days before the canonization of Pope John Paul II, a giant crucifix erected in his honor collapsed in Italy, crushing a young man and killing him, according to ANSA.



The 30-meter (98-foot) high wooden crucifix [cross] fell down during an event near the village of Cevo, in northern Italy, instantly killing the 21-year-old man, Marco Gusmini. The Jesus Christ figure attached to the cross is six meters high [if it were positioned upright, but it was lying face down so that it was only about 3 meters tall -- but after it fell, it was just two meters tall] and weighs 600 kg, according to AFP.

Witnesses reported that the victim was part of a visiting group of young Catholics, and another person was hospitalized for minor injuries after the cross fell.

The curved crucifix [cross] was designed by sculptor Enrico Job in honor of John Paul II’s visit to Brescia in northern Italy’s Lombardy region in 1998 [see pic at bottom]. It was installed in a scenic location near Cevo in 2005. The unusual curve of the crucifix [cross] was intended to evoke the scars of WWII, according to AFP.    [The "scars of WWII?" How does that work? Some scars are not curved.]

The cross before it fell looked pretty bad too:


You know the Italian engineers were worried about it falling down because you can see the bracing cables behind it.

The wood curving base of the cross broke right in the middle of the curve on the left side, right where erosion by rain and sunshine would be the worst and the stress from the 600 Kg corpus plus all that heavy wood certainly should have been a danger sign.

Even before it was in this park, in its first installation it was a cross facing downward:


.
The above image comes from a "Chiesa viva" site (Fr. Luigi Villa) with the headline:
.