.
The Vatican II popes [have] canonized more saints than all the prior popes of 1960 years PUT TOGETHER! They ended up even canonizing themselves. Yet they remove St. Philomena?
"By their deeds you shall know them".
.
.
St. Philomena was never really "canonized." She was
raised to the altars, by Pope Gregory XVI, in fulfillment of his promise to Ven. Pauline Jericot, after she returned from Mugnano cured of her serious illness. But in context of history, this is not out of the ordinary because many of our longstanding saints were never canonized. For example, none of the holy Apostles were canonized, nor was St. Ignatius of Antioch, St. Lawrence Deacon of Rome and many others who were literally contemporaries of St. Philomena, who BTW was martyred on the Feast Day of St. Lawrence, whose martyrdom extinguished paganism in Rome.
.
By their deeds you shall know them -- certainly what they believe and the guiding principle by which they operate they have not explained or defined, perhaps because they are all about not defining and thereby not exercising papal infallibility. This St. Philomena -- a little girl from 1700 years ago, stands in their way, and therefore she must be erased from the memory of those who would be subject to the Modernist unclean spirit of Vatican II.
.
She stands in their way because it is the PROFUSION of her miracles that clearly characterize her sanctity from which the appellation is derived, "St. Philomena, powerful with God." But the unclean spirit of Vatican II minions are at war against the principle of miracles. John Paul II changed the rules for canonization twice, the first time reducing the miracles required for canonization from 3 to 2, and then later, changing them again from 2 to 1. By the time he was done with everything (having endured the second longest pontificate since St. Peter himself) even one miracle was becoming a kind of joke -- and in his own process the lone so-called miracle was just that, a laughing matter! It would never have qualified as authenticated in the days before the infamous unclean spirit council. The woman whose malady was said to have been "cured" had a relapse! But just as they wouldn't let St. Philomena get in the way of their unholy agenda, so too they wouldn't let such a paltry detail as a relapse get in the way of JPII's so-called canonization.
.
If any of this seems incredible, one ought to view it as a portend of things to come, because now, as of Reformation Day 2018 (October 31st -- actually it was done 2 weeks before, on Oct. 14th, the day after Fatima, but this made it a 17-day historical "fact" by the time All Saints' Day 2018 arrived), no real miracles at all are required it seems, since no mention of any miracles granted in the name of Paul VI have been announced.
So they've managed to set aside not only the need for miracles but also they've set aside their need to explain why they've set aside any need for miracles. .
Certainly none of this would be possible if they had not un-personed St. Philomena first!
.
Which shows how much she stands in their way!
.