The vast, vast majority of Novus Ordo Masses are nothing like this.
That's not an adequate answer to the heretic Nishant's trolling for the Satanic Anti-Church, since if the offiiclal / typical edition of the Novus Ordo were Catholic, then there would be no reason in conscience to reject it. One would reject the aberrant renderings of it that take place almost everywhere. After Berg's "Traditionis Custodes", many Dioceses replaced the Tridentine Mass with Bogus Ordo Latin smells and bells and chant.
That's not the answer. Just because nearly all churches do it the Modernist way wouldn't render it to be intrinsically a "bastard Rite of Mass", but it would be simply a couple steps further than with Pius XII allowed Bugninin to do in 1955 to the Holy Week Rites.
CF the correct answer, namely, that the smells, bells, Latin, kneeling, chant, chapel veils, modest dress are merely putting lipstick on the Bogus Ordo pig, which was a Prot Liturgy.
Yet another point regarding validity can be made from Pope Leo XIII's "Apostolicae Curae", where he declares that the Anglican Ordinal would be "absolutely null and utterly void" even if they had fixed the essential form, since the intention of the Missal was vitiated from the outset by their systematic removal of all references to the priests's power to offer the Holy Sacrifice in order to accommodate the errors of the "reformers". Bogus Ordo explicitly stated that their motivation was to remove from the Traditional Catholic Mass anything that might offend the sensibilities of the same heretics. Applying the principles taught by Pope Leo XIII, that would render the Bogus Ordo invalid simply due to the wicked agenda of the reformers, where their intention was to Protestantize the Bogus Ordo.
Topic: Saint John Cantius Devout Ordinary Form versus Deum Masses. (Read 4117 times)