CathInfo.com

That’s my point.  The only people who can figure this out are those in the Church.  I’m sick and tired of sedes using 3rd-grade logic to argue that laity and simple priests can kick someone out of office for heresy.  It’s causing untold division in Tradition and it’s irrationality leads to more and more chaos as the years go by. 

You have no authority to judge that Vatican II taught heresy or that the Novus Ordo Mass isn't Catholic and pleasing to God.  This contradiction for some reason constantly escapes people.

In any case, however, there's no question of judging a cleric.  If Bergoglio is a heretic, he's outside the Church. 

That's why Bellarmine teaches that it's possible to "judge" a Pope.  As per usual, though, you're confusing juridical judgment / sentence with making a judgment. 

I judge that Bergoglio is an enemy of Tradition.  That's a judgment.  But it obviously is no juridical judgment.

That's not how it works.  I've never seen the Holy Ghost tell someone to pack up their bags and leave an building.    And that's not in canon law either.
Yes, we can recognize that "it appears" the guy stole something illegally.  But...we don't know if he stole something because he was a former employee and the owner didn't pay him his final paycheck.  We don't know if the guy stole an apple because he was starving.  We don't know if he stole because the owner sold him a crappy car and won't give him his $ back. 


We don't know anything about the case.  We can only judge based on appearances (which is a waste of time), which is superficial and contrary to all civilized legal proceedings and against the virtue of justice.  It's the police/legal system which is responsible for investigating and finding fault.