Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?  (Read 41504 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaCosaNostra

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Reputation: +4/-5
  • Gender: Male
Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #390 on: May 31, 2023, 09:05:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • :facepalm:  The Church is more than just doctrine.  

    You said the Faith has changed.  The faith - those doctrines and dogmas that require the assent of faith - is the same today as it was before Vatican II.



    Quote
    It is well known that most Modernists in Pope St Pius X's days started their plotting in the liturgical area, which is the PRACTICAL application of doctrine.  The V2 anti-church has corrupted people's application/attitude/practices of the Faith, even if the core tenants of the Faith are still "pure".  Example: The core doctrine of "temporal punishment due to sin" (i.e. purgatory) is still believed, but in practice, the V2 church no longer has requiem masses, nor encourages the faithful to pray for the dead.

    Who told you the Roman Catholic Church after V2 no longer encourages the faithful to pray for the dead?  You live in fantasy land.  You are just like a Protestants who believe whatever their heretical ministers tell them about the Catholic Church.  You've been deceived.  


    Quote
    2 of my novus ordo neighbors told me about some family members who had died and I offered to pray for their souls and started talking about purgatory.  They quickly changed the subject and didn't want to be bothered about it. 

    That's your proof that the Roman Catholic Church no longer encourages praying for the dead.  Here's what the V2 Church teaches:


    Quote
    New Catechism: 1030 All who die in God’s grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven.

    1031 The Church gives the name Purgatory to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned. The Church formulated her doctrine of faith on Purgatory especially at the Councils of Florence and Trent. the tradition of the Church, by reference to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a cleansing fire:

    As for certain lesser faults, we must believe that, before the Final Judgment, there is a purifying fire. He who is truth says that whoever utters blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will be pardoned neither in this age nor in the age to come. From this sentence we understand that certain offenses can be forgiven in this age, but certain others in the age to come.

    1032 This teaching is also based on the practice of prayer for the dead, already mentioned in Sacred Scripture: “Therefore Judas Maccabeus] made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered from their sin.” From the beginning the Church has honored the memory of the dead and offered prayers in suffrage for them, above all the Eucharistic sacrifice, so that, thus purified, they may attain the beatific vision of God. The Church also commends almsgiving, indulgences, and works of penance undertaken on behalf of the dead:

    Let us help and commemorate them. If Job’s sons were purified by their father’s sacrifice, why would we doubt that our offerings for the dead bring them some consolation? Let us not hesitate to help those who have died and to offer our prayers for them.

    Don't be such a gullible fool.  


    Quote
    They still go to weekly church and are considered "good" catholics.  It was very odd behavior for a catholic; but very typical for a novus ordo protestant...which is what they've been TRAINED TO BE.

    How many "Catholics" who belong to your sect believe that the Roman Catholic Church defected after Vatican II and now subsists in hundreds of different sects?  How many members of your sect even know what the Roman Catholic Church is?  The fact that you call the Church the V2 anti-church proves that are nothing but a Protestant heretic who likes the Traditional Mass.   


    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2033
    • Reputation: +450/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #391 on: May 31, 2023, 09:17:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How many "Catholics" who belong to your sect believe that the Roman Catholic Church defected after Vatican II and now subsists in hundreds of different sects?  How many members of your sect even know what the Roman Catholic Church is?  The fact that you call the Church the V2 anti-church proves that are nothing but a Protestant heretic who likes the Traditional Mass. 



    Is anyone paying attention yet?



    Salza calls the SSPX and Sedes Schismatics


    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/salza-calls-sspx-and-sedes-schismatics/


    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #392 on: May 31, 2023, 09:18:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A baptized child of 6, who is in the state of grace, is NOT invincibly ignorant.  Quite the contrary.  A person in the state of grace, at the age of reason, has the Holy Ghost within him and thus is prompted by Him to a) stay in the state of grace/follow the 10 commandments and b) seek God and Truth (if they aren't practicing the Faith or don't know of it).


    There are innumerable stories of young children of 7, 8, 9, 10 years old who were baptized as some type of protestant.  These children had catholic friends and the protestant children would go to the catholic church a few times in their childhood with their friends.  It wasn't until they became teenagers or young adults that they converted to the Faith because "they always liked the Catholic Church they had visited" and/or "there was something I was drawn to".

    This is grace building upon good nature.  They converted in God's time and followed His promptings.

    Or how about the millions and millions of apparitions/holy dreams that are happening all over the Middle East right now?  Muslims are hearing about Christ and He is appearing to them in dreams, telling them to "Follow Me" and then He gives them instructions to go to some place, at a specific time and look for a specific person.  Who turns out to be a Christian.  They end up getting baptized.

    A muslim would be "invincibly ignorant" and look at what God is doing for them.  Look how He is calling those of good will.

    A baptized child is the Temple of the Holy Ghost...all God has to do is speak to them in their heart.  There's no way they are ignorant (unless, by sin, they close their heart to Him).

    You are responding to your own criteria (ie., a 6 year-old in the state of grace who is NOT invincibly ignorant), not mine.

    I’d guess there are very, very few who meet that criteria, but that's beside the point:

    We’re talking about an invincibly ignorant 6 uear-old in the state of grace.

    Please explain how such a one can forfeit grace without committing a mortal sin (or conversely, how he can be damned in the state of grace).
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32972
    • Reputation: +29297/-598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #393 on: May 31, 2023, 09:19:04 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • How many "Catholics" who belong to your sect believe that the Roman Catholic Church defected after Vatican II and now subsists in hundreds of different sects?  How many members of your sect even know what the Roman Catholic Church is?  The fact that you call the Church the V2 anti-church proves that are nothing but a Protestant heretic who likes the Traditional Mass. 

    Ah, I see your crazy belief. You think that Traditional Catholics are LITERALLY making the same mistake as Protestants after the Protestant Reformation -- rejecting the True Church ALONG WITH all the abuses, errors in individual priests; and splitting into countless sects which rejected various doctrine(s) and created new doctrine(s)

    SORRY, BUT NO.

    Traditional Catholics don't reject ANY doctrine, nor did we come up with ANYTHING new. It's the Conciliar Church that left the Faith, period.

    And you've been banned on the grounds that CathInfo is a forum for all TRADITIONAL CATHOLICS and you are some sort of weird Conciliar/Indult/Dogmatic-Home-Aloner hybrid, who rejects both the Traditional Movement AND the errors of the Council.

    I'm pretty liberal about who I allow on CathInfo -- but you have to be Traditional Catholic.

    Red flags for me -- that someone doesn't belong -- include the phrases "Traditional Catholics are protestants" or "Traditional Catholics are going to hell."
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2033
    • Reputation: +450/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #394 on: May 31, 2023, 09:22:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And you've been banned on the grounds that CathInfo is a forum for all TRADITIONAL CATHOLICS and you are some sort of weird Conciliar/Dogmatic Home Aloner hybrid who rejects the Traditional Movement AND the errors of the Council.


    He's either Robert Siscoe or John Salza.
    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #395 on: May 31, 2023, 09:28:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • He's either Robert Siscoe or John Salza.

    But they’re not home-aloners, as Matthew said this guy was?
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2033
    • Reputation: +450/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #396 on: May 31, 2023, 09:32:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But they’re not home-aloners, as Matthew said this guy was?


    He's not a home aloner.

    His postings going back and forth with the user Catholic Knight show him to be advancing arguments found in True or False Pope
    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12500
    • Reputation: +7946/-2452
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #397 on: May 31, 2023, 09:33:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    We’re talking about an invincibly ignorant 6 uear-old in the state of grace.
    One in the state of grace has the Holy Ghost inside of them.  Are you saying it's possible for one to have the Holy Ghost in their soul and yet be invincibly ignorant?  :confused: That's a contradiction.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12500
    • Reputation: +7946/-2452
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #398 on: May 31, 2023, 09:35:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Who told you the Roman Catholic Church after V2 no longer encourages the faithful to pray for the dead?  You live in fantasy land.
    The V2 church no longer has requiem masses; instead they have "celebration of life" masses.  :laugh1:  99% of every novus ordo catholic I have ever talked to, when speaking of the dead, say "Oh, they are already in heaven."  Thus, logically, why the need to pray for the dead?

    The V2 church gives lip-service to doctrine, while in practice (through the protestantization of the liturgy), minimizes/contradicts such.  "As you pray" (i.e. protestant liturgy) is "how you believe" (i.e. living protestant doctrine).
     

    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2033
    • Reputation: +450/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #399 on: May 31, 2023, 09:36:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • He's not a home aloner.

    His postings going back and forth with the user Catholic Knight show him to be advancing arguments found in True or False Pope


    True or False Pope


    SSPX PAGE



    Our Statement on the Society of St. Pius X



    Many have asked why we have changed our position on the SSPX, since we frequented their chapels for many years, and particularly since the Society publicly endorsed our book True or False Pope?.  To be clear, we have no personal hostility toward the SSPX and the many good men in their ranks. We also continue to attend the Traditional Mass exclusively and hold the Recognize & Resist position, properly understood.

    However, our extensive study of ecclesiology and Sedevacantism led us to the inescapable conclusion that the SSPX is in the same canonical and ecclesiastical position as the Sedevacantist and other independent clergy (outside of its delegated faculties), who are not part of the Roman Catholic Church, have no juridical mission from the Church, and hence cannot lawfully exercise their priestly powers.  In fact, we were forced to recognize that the Society advances the same erroneous arguments as the Sedevacantists do, to justify their operation without mission, which is contrary to the divine law.

    In the course of our study, we also realized that the SSPX embraces other critical theological errors (on the Profession of Faith, juridical mission, supplied jurisdiction, Collegiality, sacramental intention, the nature of the Church, etc.) which we are addressing in our series of articles. Because many of these errors are rooted in an erroneous understanding of the Church itself (errors in ecclesiology), they are actually graver than the Liberal errors on the Left, and that is because they lead Catholics out of the Church, outside of which there is no salvation.

    It is our firm hope and prayer that the Society renounce its doctrinal errors and accepts the Church’s Profession of Faith, so that it can be reconciled with the Roman Catholic Church, and given a canonical mission to carry out its ministry lawfully. It is for this purpose that we make our position public, so that the Society’s leadership (and those who support the SSPX) will see the truth, and take the necessary steps toward achieving the long-awaited reconciliation.


    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.

    Offline trad123

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2033
    • Reputation: +450/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #400 on: May 31, 2023, 09:40:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • True or False Pope


    SSPX PAGE






    Are you still rolling your eyes Sean, or can you finally see it?



    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/salza-calls-sspx-and-sedes-schismatics/msg866062/#msg866062


    This is the same Salza that has gotten many good reviews by SSPX folk for his co-authored book "True or False Pope", the book that Fr. Kramer has demolished on several points.



    https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/salza-calls-sspx-and-sedes-schismatics/msg866065/#msg866065




    ::)




    2 Corinthians 4:3-4 

    And if our gospel be also hid, it is hid to them that are lost, In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #401 on: May 31, 2023, 09:52:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • He's not a home aloner.

    His postings going back and forth with the user Catholic Knight show him to be advancing arguments found in True or False Pope

    My postings against Catholic Knight advance the arguments found in True or False Pope, and I am neither Siscoe nor Salza.

    They simply did the legwork of refuting both Fr. Kramer and sedevacantism, and advanced the arguments held by all R&R who maintain +Lefebvre's resistance, and consequently, any/all SSPXers and Resistance would be apt to make the same arguments as compiled by SS.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #402 on: May 31, 2023, 09:53:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One in the state of grace has the Holy Ghost inside of them.  Are you saying it's possible for one to have the Holy Ghost in their soul and yet be invincibly ignorant?  :confused: That's a contradiction.

    Are you saying the Holy Ghost is expelled without sin??
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
    « Reply #403 on: May 31, 2023, 09:54:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • True or False Pope


    SSPX PAGE



    Our Statement on the Society of St. Pius X



    Many have asked why we have changed our position on the SSPX, since we frequented their chapels for many years, and particularly since the Society publicly endorsed our book True or False Pope?.  To be clear, we have no personal hostility toward the SSPX and the many good men in their ranks. We also continue to attend the Traditional Mass exclusively and hold the Recognize & Resist position, properly understood.

    However, our extensive study of ecclesiology and Sedevacantism led us to the inescapable conclusion that the SSPX is in the same canonical and ecclesiastical position as the Sedevacantist and other independent clergy (outside of its delegated faculties), who are not part of the Roman Catholic Church, have no juridical mission from the Church, and hence cannot lawfully exercise their priestly powers.  In fact, we were forced to recognize that the Society advances the same erroneous arguments as the Sedevacantists do, to justify their operation without mission, which is contrary to the divine law.

    In the course of our study, we also realized that the SSPX embraces other critical theological errors (on the Profession of Faith, juridical mission, supplied jurisdiction, Collegiality, sacramental intention, the nature of the Church, etc.) which we are addressing in our series of articles. Because many of these errors are rooted in an erroneous understanding of the Church itself (errors in ecclesiology), they are actually graver than the Liberal errors on the Left, and that is because they lead Catholics out of the Church, outside of which there is no salvation.

    It is our firm hope and prayer that the Society renounce its doctrinal errors and accepts the Church’s Profession of Faith, so that it can be reconciled with the Roman Catholic Church, and given a canonical mission to carry out its ministry lawfully. It is for this purpose that we make our position public, so that the Society’s leadership (and those who support the SSPX) will see the truth, and take the necessary steps toward achieving the long-awaited reconciliation.

    Why are you posting this???
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."