I persist in the truth because Bergoglio is the non-canonically-elected destroyer that St. Francis of Assisi is referring to. I am hoping the everyone starts paying closer attention to him and his deceptions.
Yes, I agree with you that the problems did not start with Bergoglio. But he is the end point, the culmination of all of the errors that traditional Catholics recognize. And the methodology of the Synodal Church is purely Antichristian.
Why spend so much time talking about people and events that took place 60+ years ago? The prophesied Antichrist is here and in the news everyday. He's the guy who "looks like a lamb and speaks like a dragon" (Apoc. 13:11). He's "the bishop dressed in white."
Our Catholic Faith, or rather The Deposit of Faith, is based on Scripture and Tradition. It is not based on the private revelation of a saint, such as St. Francis.
Regarding the issue of talking about things that took place 60+ years ago, well, it helps to know how the Modernists took over the Church, and what happened back then. If you want to focus solely on the supposed prophesied Antichrist, that's fine, but some of us do not see the problem in that light, even though it may be true. There isn't anything in Scripture or Tradition that points to this time as being the time of the antichrist.