Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?  (Read 55953 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #465 on: May 31, 2023, 03:00:03 PM »
His Petulance strikes again.

Thank you for this profound contribution.  

Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #466 on: May 31, 2023, 03:00:34 PM »
You aren’t answering the question:

If one is invincibly ignorant, by what means is grace forfeited (since full knowledge is necessary for the grave sin by which the grace is lost)?

Conversely, if the grace is not forfeited, how would such a one be damned?
Bump.


Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #467 on: May 31, 2023, 03:02:28 PM »
Thank you for this profound contribution. 

Indeed.  You are quite welcome.

Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #468 on: May 31, 2023, 03:03:56 PM »
Your Petulance,

Are you the one down-thumbing the last couple of posts?

Re: R&R -- why don't you get behind Father Chazal's sede-impoundism?
« Reply #469 on: May 31, 2023, 03:25:45 PM »
No, you and Pax are the only morons.

Still waiting for an asnwer to this question:

If a 6 year-old schismatic in the state of grace is invincibly ignorant, by what means is grace forfeited (since full knowledge is necessary for the grave sin by which the grace is lost)?

Conversely, if the grace is not forfeited, how would such a one be damned?
There are no schismatics in the state of grace, cf. Unam Sanctam.

Still waiting for an answer to a yes or no question, I've responded to your question with a reasonable answer you've ignore.