He's not a home aloner.
His postings going back and forth with the user Catholic Knight show him to be advancing arguments found in True or False Pope
My postings against Catholic Knight advance the arguments found in
True or False Pope, and I am neither Siscoe nor Salza.
They simply did the legwork of refuting both Fr. Kramer and sedevacantism, and advanced the arguments held by all R&R who maintain +Lefebvre's resistance, and consequently, any/all SSPXers and Resistance would be apt to make the same arguments as compiled by SS.