Hobbledehoy said: The message of Our Lady of the Rosary at Fatima is nothing more than the summary of Our Lord teachings in the Holy Gospels, the teachings of the Fathers and the Doctors and spiritual masters, and the teachings of the Apostolic See; and it was made in a simplicity that could only have been of celestial origin and presented the profound truths of the Catholic faith in a practical manner that was easy to comprehend and implement in one's life.
Here is the crux of it. Nick says he was a Catholic and he converted to the Orhtodox schism.
Nick, as a Catholic, did you ever pray the Holy Rosary? The Holy Theotokos will answer all your prayers and lead you in the path that leads to life.
You've made a pretty persistent attempt to defend your false religion, but you have really come to the wrong place if you want to convert others here to your sect.
You know less about the Orthodox than most posters here and even less about the Catholic Faith and what purports to be the Catholic religion, but is not, i.e. conciliar church of Vatican 2. May I suggest that you go and do your homework.
Nick said: Well, if Mary was conceived in some way other than the rest of us, then she wouldn't be fully human, and likewise Christ wouldn't be both fully human and fully God!
See! you don't even know the meaning of the Immaculate Conception. No Catholic would say that Mary was not conceived in the usual way, but that her sould was always free from sin. Angel Gabriel addressed her as
Full of Grace! That means that there is no sin in her.
Nick said: evil is not in the condom, since it's just a piece of latex!
I remember reading about some Fillipino village that was inundated with unwanted condoms. They used them in some horticultural venture. Can't remember what, but they were put to excellent use. These people did not sin in using them for another purpose than that unintended by the generous donors. But if they had used them to stop babies coming into the world, or so they could prevent getting some venereal disease, then that would have been sinful. I know that, as an "Orthodox", you probably won't be able to recognise the subtle differences.
Gooch said:
Jurgens, The Faith of the Early Fathers, Liturgical Press, Vol. 1: 210.
I have found this very useful in refuting "Orthodox" false beliefs. The "Orthodox" love to say they follow the Fathers. Get yourself a copy, Nick, and look up Papacy in the index, especially take note of those hundreds of references which illustrate the on-going primacy of Peter
and his successors. I am praying for you, Nick.