in my opinion...the problem with you non sedes is you are in danger of being schismatic..how do you get around the following while at the same time state the non catholic freemason , Christ destroying Borgolio is a true pope...

Accordingly schismatics properly so called are those who, willfully and intentionally separate themselves from the unity of the Church… Wherefore schismatics are those who refuse to submit to the Sovereign Pontiff, and to hold communion with those members of the Church who acknowledge his supremacy.”

so do you non sedes submit to Borgolio the Jєω....if not tell me how you are not a schismatic

God bless

Their response is that they intend to submit, and that they do submit in all things lawfully commanded and truthfully taught.

I'm sorry but I don't understand how.  How does it prevent any such thing?  

Because, according to sedeprivationism, deposition from material office requires the authority of the Church ... i.e. it excludes conclavism.

Because, according to sedeprivationism, deposition from material office requires the authority of the Church ... i.e. it excludes conclavism.

OK true, it rules out conclavism, but it still allows for any individual to question whether any given pope holds the formal office.  I don't see how the same infinite regression argument doesn't apply to it.  It seems like everyone is in the same awkward epistemic boat, whether it be R + R, Sedeprivationism, Sedevacantism, or heck even a conservative Novus Ordite can't accept everything Francis says.

The question, Ladislaus, is whether you are willing and able to retract your opinion and submit to the judgment of the Church.

Are you?
Pope Benedict XVI 2009 - "Until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the Society has no canonical status in the Church, and its ministers — even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty — do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church."

To put it another way, we remain the pope's good subjects, but God's first.

Nothing profound, nothing complicated, just Catholic.

for arguement sake I say you are schismatic, you have no real defence....the sede position is superior

Words in canon:  We offer Thee for Thy holy Catholic Church:  which vouchsafe to grant peace, as also to preserve unite, and govern it throughout the whole world together with Thy servant N. our Pope; N. our Bishops; as also all "orthodox" believers and professors of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith.

Vatican I defined "Pope" and when they did, "Infallibilty" defined, found anti-popes.  Can we honestly list Francis as pope, with the words that follow: orthodox, is he a believer and professor of the Catholic and Apostoic Faith?  Vatican I helped the Faithful of the Church to do as God/CHrist said, "You will know them by their fruits.  

Thank God for Vatican I, for Cardinal Manning and Pope Leo XIII just for starters.  They knew what was coming.  They knew Freemasonary made it to the top=pope.
They knew a Council had to be held, whether or not Bishops wanted it or not.  Pope Leo XIII experienced the DEvil with Christ and their conversation.

We are all bound to pray for those who are to see over our souls.  Their names may not fit in the canon with the words that surround them if their names were put there.

We know by prophecy how Rome will end up.  We know the Mass will end.  The Redemptorist priest knew this and wrote it in their books, "we know the Mass will end" that is continual.  Christ's blood in Eternal, on earth, continual.

We can not change the words, but those who are supposedly clergy are expected to act : orthodox, believers and professors of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith.  IF the clergy choose to follow the ways of Satan, they are in heresy and they are the schismatics,

Vatican I defined "Pope" and when they did, "Infallibilty" defined, found anti-popes.  Can we honestly list Francis as pope, with the words that follow: orthodox, is he a believer and professor of the Catholic and Apostoic Faith? 

Yep, to put Bergoglio in there next to that phrases is very difficult to swallow.  Latin is "cultores fidei" ... which means more along the lines of keepers/preservers/fosterers of the faith.

His Grace Archbishop Lefebvre, from the link given earlier: "Consequently, the Society of St. Pius X, its priests, brothers, sisters, and oblates, cannot tolerate among its members those who refuse to pray for the Pope or affirm that the Novus Ordo Missae is per se invalid." To drop the name of the Pope from the Canon and then to declare this to others proudly is nothing less than public schism.

Again, "His Grace Archbishop Lefebvre" rejects your opinion that the legitimacy of the Vatican II popes is dogmatic fact.  

At some point +Lefebvre expelled the sedevacantists after he decided there could be no peace in the Society with such a division (in the wake of "The Nine").

Read this article:  http://www.fathercekada.com/2012/09/04/pro-sedevacantism-quotes-from-abp-lefebvre/

It is replete with dozens of quotations from +Lefebvre in which he goes from being open to and tolerant of sedevacantism, to very nearly (by his own words) coming out openly as sedevacantists.  He states at one point that he and Bishop de Castro Mayer did not YET consider it prudent to come out publicly with it.