Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Robert Rawhide  (Read 1597 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2726
  • Reputation: +1/-0
  • Gender: Male
Robert Rawhide
« on: November 10, 2009, 03:52:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I now know that you are not a dogmatic sedevacantist.

    Do you believe that there are Catholics in the Novus Ordo who pray to John Paul II?

    Quote from: Robert Rawhide
    Quote from: Catholic Martyr
    The only thing that my words should convey to you is that I do not generally presume anybody to be Catholic.

    To be specific, I see that you hold the correct position of sedevacante, without which you would not be Catholic, not be united to Christ as one of His members.

    As for the remainder of your beliefs, which either make or break your Catholicity, I have seen no profession one way or the other, thus have refrained from coming to any conclusion at all.

    You are or you aren't Catholic, and I simply have no way of knowing (unless I scour your forum posts, but why on earth would I do that?).

    What you are doing CM is entirely unCatholic. Nowhere does the Church, or the Saints, say that you should, by default, consider people who profess to be Catholic, to be non-Catholic until you have heard enough of their beliefs. That is an unCatholic invention. Jansenistic non-sense. You won't find anything but the opposite of that in Church history, teaching and practice. Your mind-frame on this opposes Scripture and the Saints who believed heartily people were Catholic who said they were, and who still believed people were Catholic even when they per chance were mistaken on something doctrinal. Martin Luther was considered a Catholic right up until his final and official condemnation by Rome. You entirely ignore the whole concept of pertinacity and how it is only determined by opposition to living Church authority alone. To find what you think is an opposing Church quote to what someone believes doesn't make one pertinacious and a non-Catholic.

    All invention. Novelty. Modernists love that sort of thing.


    Luther was called a heretic by members of the clergy long before he was excommunicated.

    Quote from: Robert Rawhide
    You entirely ignore the whole concept of pertinacity and how it is only determined by opposition to living Church authority alone.


    So a person can be in a false sect, and as long as he think they are Catholic, then even if the sect is full of heresies and is NOT the Catholic Church, he is still a Catholic while adhering to it, as long as he does not oppose the living Church authority?  And by living authority, you mean the hierarchy, priests and bishops, correct?  And that unless such a person were to be admonished by the authoritative clergy, we could never know who is pertinacious and who isn't?  Do you believe that layman may never admonish others?  That a person may not be admonished by salutary precepts?  Also please present to me the Catholic teaching which you believe defines pertinacity.

    Thank you.

    Quote from: Rawhide
    To find what you think is an opposing Church quote to what someone believes doesn't make one pertinacious and a non-Catholic.


    Correct.  A person may be a Catholic while believing a material heresy.  Certain dogmas, however, must be know by all for them to be said to hold the Catholic Faith and in the way of salvation, and I believe you know which dogmas those are.  (cf. Athanasian Creed)

    Quote from: Rawhide
    All invention. Novelty. Modernists love that sort of thing.


    A heretic has no authority or even membership in the Catholic Church, so how can a person who adheres to a heretical religious superior be in the Catholic Church?  Such a person is outside the pale of the Church and cannot be saved (cf. Mirari Vos, Graves Ac Diuturnae)

    He is in a sect.  This is not novelty, unless you accuse Pope Gregory XVI and Pope Pius IX of inventing novelties in the two encyclicals I just mentioned.

    Quote from: Pope Gregory, in [i
    Mirari Vos[/i]]Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained.


    Is the Novus Ordo the Catholic religion???

    Quote from: He went on and
    Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that "there is one God, one faith, one baptism" may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever

    They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that "those who are not with Christ are against Him," and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore "without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate."

    Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: "He who is for the See of Peter is for me." A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: "The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?"


    Who is a schismatic but he who refuses communion with or subjection to the Roman Pontiff and those Catholics who profess subjection to him?

    Quote from: Pope Pius IX, in [i
    Graves Ac Diuturnae[/i]]In order to spread their teachings more widely, We know that some of them have been appointed to teach sacred theology in the University of Bern, hoping to be able in this way to gain new followers from the Catholic youth for their wicked faction. However, We have already reproved and condemned this deplorable sect which has produced from the old store of the heretics so many errors opposed to the principal tenets of the Catholic faith. This sect overthrows the foundations of the Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the Ecuмenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many ways. We have decreed and declared in Our letter of 21 November 1873 that those unfortunate men who belong to, adhere to, and support that sect should be considered as schismatics and separated from communion with the Church.


    He calls them unfortunate, not pertinacious, and schismatic.

    Quote from: He went on and
    We think it is Our duty to repeat this public declaration now and to request you to preserve the unity of faith among your faithful by every possible means in accordance with your eminent zeal and your renowned virtue. For you have given notable examples of this virtue in bearing tribulations for the cause of God. You should remind them to beware of these treacherous enemies of the flock of Christ and their poisoned foods. They should totally shun their religious celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established to transmit the sacred teachings. They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical minister without possessing a legitimate mission or any jurisdiction. They should avoid them as strangers and thieves who come only to steal, slay, and destroy. For the Church's children should consider the proper action to preserve the most precious treasure of faith, without which it is impossible to please God, as well as action calculated to achieve the goal of faith, that is the salvation of their souls, by following the straight road of justice.


    And you would tell me to presume that everyone is a Catholic who claims to be, especially in this age of the Great APOSTASY, when such necessary dogmas as Christ's Divinity, for example, are explicitly denied by many claiming to be Catholics?

    No.  The prudent course is to prove all things and hold to that which is good, to test the spirits, and before uniting in spiritual matters with others, discuss the Faith with them and see if they truly hold it whole and inviolate.

    Anybody who refuses to answer questions about what they believe has something to hide, and that is not the Catholic way.  It would not be unjust to withhold communion with a person who refused to answer such questions.

    If you disagree, you better have a good argument, because the Church certainly seems to teach otherwise.


    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #1 on: November 12, 2009, 01:40:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Those who believe they are Catholic and who do not knowingly reject any doctrine or dogma of the faith are what would be called "Catholic at heart".  They would be saved by BOD as I hope you will be as I do not doubt your sincerity.  

    And you would tell me to presume that everyone is a Catholic who claims to be, especially in this age of the Great APOSTASY, when such necessary dogmas as Christ's Divinity, for example, are explicitly denied by many claiming to be Catholics?

    You betcha.  It is because of this time of Apostasy, when everything is more confusing that people can be considered Catholic in good faith.  They are so by their baptism and by not having knowingly rejected any doctrine.  We will assume that they believe in the Holy Trinity and are subject to the Pontiff or to whom the believe to be Pope.  

    You waste countless hours straining gnats that get you nowhere but closer to hell as you mislead souls by trying to bind on the conscience of others things you clearly do not understand.  

    Pope Gregory, in Mirari Vos said:
    Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained.


    Not relevant as we are considering those who are not indifferent but ignorant and who have reason to be so because of the confusing times we live in with no visible authority in the Church to guide us.  


    He went on and said:
    Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that "there is one God, one faith, one baptism" may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever

    They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that "those who are not with Christ are against Him," and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore "without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate."

    Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: "He who is for the See of Peter is for me." A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: "The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?"



    Not relevant as we are considering those who do not think themselves to be schismatic.  He does not think that he "too" in addition to Catholics but thinks himself to Catholic and is so by baptism and by holding to the faith, the best he can without consciously rejecting a doctrine.

    Pope Pius IX, in Graves Ac Diuturnae said:
    In order to spread their teachings more widely, We know that some of them have been appointed to teach sacred theology in the University of Bern, hoping to be able in this way to gain new followers from the Catholic youth for their wicked faction. However, We have already reproved and condemned this deplorable sect which has produced from the old store of the heretics so many errors opposed to the principal tenets of the Catholic faith. This sect overthrows the foundations of the Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the Ecuмenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many ways. We have decreed and declared in Our letter of 21 November 1873 that those unfortunate men who belong to, adhere to, and support that sect should be considered as schismatics and separated from communion with the Church.



    Irrelevant, as these people do not shamelessly reject doctrine but are not even aware of it.

    He went on and said:
    We think it is Our duty to repeat this public declaration now and to request you to preserve the unity of faith among your faithful by every possible means in accordance with your eminent zeal and your renowned virtue. For you have given notable examples of this virtue in bearing tribulations for the cause of God. You should remind them to beware of these treacherous enemies of the flock of Christ and their poisoned foods. They should totally shun their religious celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established to transmit the sacred teachings. They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical minister without possessing a legitimate mission or any jurisdiction. They should avoid them as strangers and thieves who come only to steal, slay, and destroy. For the Church's children should consider the proper action to preserve the most precious treasure of faith, without which it is impossible to please God, as well as action calculated to achieve the goal of faith, that is the salvation of their souls, by following the straight road of justice.


    Not relevant as they believe they hold the Catholic faith and are worshipping in Catholic Churches.  

    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #2 on: November 12, 2009, 08:22:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Your entire bogus response essentially flies in the face of the following:

    Quote from: Christ
    But because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth.

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #3 on: November 12, 2009, 08:23:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You basically are saying that anyone who believes they are right are right.  Why don't you apply this to the confusing age of the "Reformation"?

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #4 on: November 13, 2009, 01:02:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm saying anybody who does not willfully oppose the truth is not as culpable for their errors as the willful heretics and schismatics are and that what applies to a Pope or a bishop does not necessarily apply to a lay-person and what applies when a valid pope is ruling does not necessarily apply when the laity have been chasing their tails for the past 50 years during the time of the Great Apostacy.  Distinctions man, distinctions.  Despite what you may think you are not the only living person today that is going to make it to Heaven.  By your standards we would have to judge you to be a heretic and outside the Church because of your stance on BOB/D.  Nothing can save you.  Eternal damnation awaits.  Tough luck, as the Calvinists would say.  It does not matter if this is your fault or if you are of good will or not.  

    Good thing God does not think like you do.
    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church


    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #5 on: November 13, 2009, 10:48:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: LoT
    I'm saying anybody who does not willfully oppose the truth is not as culpable for their errors as the willful heretics and schismatics


    So you believe that "willful heretics and schismatics" are deliberately opposing the truth, ie: God, and that they know it?  Calvinists believe that they are upholding the truth, John.  They don't believe that they are fighting it.  EVERY so-called denomination believes itself to be upholding the truth.  Heretics are deceived, John, having chosen a lie, whether they realize it or not.

    Quote
    Despite what you may think you are not the only living person today that is going to make it to Heaven.


    Funny, I just finished mentioning logical fallacies in your other thread.  You have just created a strawman.

    When have I ever stated that I think I am the only person who is living today who will make it to Heaven, or even that I feel like I will make it there at all?  Your gratuitous use of logical fallacies should be a red flag to anybody.

    Quote
    By your standards we would have to judge you to be a heretic and outside the Church because of your stance on BOB/D.


    How contrary of you.  By my standards, which are not mine, but those given by the Solemn Magisterium, I believe that the very words of an ex cathedra decree are infallible and irreformable and to contradict them one iota is heresy.

    By those standards, sir (Catholic standards), I am holding to a dogma.

    Quote
    It does not matter if this is your fault or if you are of good will or not.


    A person separated from the Church is so because of a judgment from God on account of sin (2 Thessalonians 2:10).  This includes heretics and schismatic who may not even know what they are rebelling against.

    Quote
    Good thing God does not think like you do.


    Logical fallacy.  Begging the question.  YOU know how God "thinks"?  His thoughts are above whose thoughts John?  Everyone.

    Offline Lover of Truth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8700
    • Reputation: +1158/-863
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #6 on: November 14, 2009, 06:26:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Those who believe they are Catholic and who do not knowingly reject any doctrine or dogma of the faith are what would be called "Catholic at heart".  They would be saved by BOD as I hope you will be as I do not doubt your sincerity.  

    And you would tell me to presume that everyone is a Catholic who claims to be, especially in this age of the Great APOSTASY, when such necessary dogmas as Christ's Divinity, for example, are explicitly denied by many claiming to be Catholics?

    You betcha.  It is because of this time of Apostasy, when everything is more confusing that people can be considered Catholic in good faith.  They are so by their baptism and by not having knowingly rejected any doctrine.  We will assume that they believe in the Holy Trinity and are subject to the Pontiff or to whom the believe to be Pope.  

    You waste countless hours straining gnats that get you nowhere but closer to hell as you mislead souls by trying to bind on the conscience of others things you clearly do not understand.  

    Pope Gregory, in Mirari Vos said:
    Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained.


    Not relevant as we are considering those who are not indifferent but ignorant and who have reason to be so because of the confusing times we live in with no visible authority in the Church to guide us.  


    He went on and said:
    Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that "there is one God, one faith, one baptism" may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever

    They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that "those who are not with Christ are against Him," and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore "without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate."

    Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: "He who is for the See of Peter is for me." A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: "The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?"



    Not relevant as we are considering those who do not think themselves to be schismatic.  He does not think that he "too" in addition to Catholics but thinks himself to Catholic and is so by baptism and by holding to the faith, the best he can without consciously rejecting a doctrine.

    Pope Pius IX, in Graves Ac Diuturnae said:
    In order to spread their teachings more widely, We know that some of them have been appointed to teach sacred theology in the University of Bern, hoping to be able in this way to gain new followers from the Catholic youth for their wicked faction. However, We have already reproved and condemned this deplorable sect which has produced from the old store of the heretics so many errors opposed to the principal tenets of the Catholic faith. This sect overthrows the foundations of the Catholic religion, shamelessly rejects the dogmatic definitions of the Ecuмenical Vatican Council, and devotes itself to the ruin of souls in so many ways. We have decreed and declared in Our letter of 21 November 1873 that those unfortunate men who belong to, adhere to, and support that sect should be considered as schismatics and separated from communion with the Church.



    Irrelevant, as these people do not shamelessly reject doctrine but are not even aware of it.

    He went on and said:
    We think it is Our duty to repeat this public declaration now and to request you to preserve the unity of faith among your faithful by every possible means in accordance with your eminent zeal and your renowned virtue. For you have given notable examples of this virtue in bearing tribulations for the cause of God. You should remind them to beware of these treacherous enemies of the flock of Christ and their poisoned foods. They should totally shun their religious celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established to transmit the sacred teachings. They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical minister without possessing a legitimate mission or any jurisdiction. They should avoid them as strangers and thieves who come only to steal, slay, and destroy. For the Church's children should consider the proper action to preserve the most precious treasure of faith, without which it is impossible to please God, as well as action calculated to achieve the goal of faith, that is the salvation of their souls, by following the straight road of justice.


    Not relevant as they believe they hold the Catholic faith and are worshipping in Catholic Churches.  



    CM, you really have not been able to respond to the above points, perhaps because the logic I use above is sound.

    During the confusing time of the "reformation" there was a Pope and there was no false Pope that the world thought to be valid.  

    God does not condemn those not culpable for erring with the rest of the world.  Father forgive them for they know not what they do.

    He condemns the Pharisees because they know better but says the ignorant will have fewer stripes.

    "I receive Thee, redeeming Prince of my soul. Out of love for Thee have I studied, watched through many nights, and exerted myself: Thee did I preach and teach. I have never said aught against Thee. Nor do I persist stubbornly in my views. If I have ever expressed myself erroneously on this Sacrament, I submit to the judgement of the Holy Roman Church, in obedience of which I now part from this world." Saint Thomas Aquinas the greatest Doctor of the Church

    Offline JustCatholic

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 28
    • Reputation: +10/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #7 on: November 15, 2009, 07:58:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    CM: And you would tell me to presume that everyone is a Catholic who claims to be, especially in this age of the Great APOSTASY, when such necessary dogmas as Christ's Divinity, for example, are explicitly denied by many claiming to be Catholics?

    Lover of Truth: You betcha.  It is because of this time of Apostasy, when everything is more confusing that people can be considered Catholic in good faith.  They are so by their baptism and by not having knowingly rejected any doctrine.  We will assume that they believe in the Holy Trinity and are subject to the Pontiff or to whom the believe to be Pope.  

    You waste countless hours straining gnats that get you nowhere but closer to hell as you mislead souls by trying to bind on the conscience of others things you clearly do not understand.


    Lover of Truth is that blessed Catholic who holds to both the letter and to the heart of the law. CM is so "Catholic" in the Pharisaical sense that he has been found several times trying to burn himself at the stake. He generally throws fire in the direction of others and must be followed with a fire extinguisher at all times.
    WipeO my Typos and may the good God  bless thee. Spiritual eyes,  not the physical, buys, however hard one tries.


    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #8 on: November 16, 2009, 08:36:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Lover of Truth
    CM, you really have not been able to respond to the above points, perhaps because the logic I use above is sound.


    Your assumption that I have not been able to respond is incorrect.  I have simply been away.  If you wish for detailed responses to your assertions, you will have them.

    Quote
    During the confusing time of the "reformation" there was a Pope and there was no false Pope that the world thought to be valid.


    Indeed.  There were Catholics who had such a poor grasp of their faith, or such grievous sins against morality that they were sent the operation of error to believe Protestant lying (and they became Protestant, even though they were convinced it was true).

    Quote
    God does not condemn those not culpable for erring with the rest of the world.


    No.

    Quote
    Father forgive them for they know not what they do.


    Isn't that from Scripture? :wink:

    Quote
    He condemns the Pharisees because they know better but says the ignorant will have fewer stripes.


    No, he doesn't.  They condemn themselves.  I'll be back later.

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #9 on: November 17, 2009, 11:55:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Seeing the size of your post, I thought there would be a lot more work involved in responding to your "sound logic".  I guess I was wrong.

    Quote from: Lover of Truth
    Those who believe they are Catholic and who do not knowingly reject any doctrine or dogma of the faith are what would be called "Catholic at heart".  They would be saved by BOD as I hope you will be as I do not doubt your sincerity.


    Saved by BoD?  Your getting tenuous John, very tenuous.  The baptism of desire heresy teaches that a person may be saved who is not baptized in water and the form of the Church.  But now you are applying the term as a means of exonerating baptized people for professing adherence to a false Church?

    Truly you have demonstrated how BoD is a tool used for no other purpose than to promote salvation outside the Church.  

    Quote from: LoT
    Quote from: Catholic Martyr
    And you would tell me to presume that everyone is a Catholic who claims to be, especially in this age of the Great APOSTASY, when such necessary dogmas as Christ's Divinity, for example, are explicitly denied by many claiming to be Catholics?


    You betcha.  It is because of this time of Apostasy, when everything is more confusing that people can be considered Catholic in good faith.  They are so by their baptism and by not having knowingly rejected any doctrine.  We will assume that they believe in the Holy Trinity and are subject to the Pontiff or to whom the believe to be Pope.

    You waste countless hours straining gnats that get you nowhere but closer to hell as you mislead souls by trying to bind on the conscience of others things you clearly do not understand.  


    Clearly do not understand?  That is a logical fallacy John.  Begging the question.  Have you demonstrated any evidence that I do not understand whereof I speak?  No, as we shall see.

    And why don't you apply this to "Protestants in good faith" who have never heard of the papacy?  After all, many of them profess the Catholic Faith whole and undefiled, as "the Catholic Faith, whole and undefiled" was defined by Pope Eugene IV.  Surely they won't be condemned by their lack of subjection to the Pontiff, if they have never heard of his office, shall they?  They don't ALL knowingly reject the Vicar of Jesus Christ, do they?

    And if they are condemned, John, why is that?

    Quote from: LoT
    Quote from: Catholic Martyr
    Pope Gregory, in Mirari Vos said:
    Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained.


    Not relevant as we are considering those who are not indifferent but ignorant and who have reason to be so because of the confusing times we live in with no visible authority in the Church to guide us.  


    Entirely relevant, because the opinion of indifferentism is applied to those labouring IGNORANTLY in false religions.


    Quote from: Catholic Martyr
    He went on and said:
    Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that "there is one God, one faith, one baptism" may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever

    They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that "those who are not with Christ are against Him," and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore "without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate."

    Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: "He who is for the See of Peter is for me." A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: "The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?"



    Quote from: LoT
    Not relevant as we are considering those who do not think themselves to be schismatic.  He does not think that he "too" in addition to Catholics but thinks himself to Catholic and is so by baptism and by holding to the faith, the best he can without consciously rejecting a doctrine.


    Ridiculous.  No schismatic thinks himself to be schismatic.

    Quote from: LoT
    Quote from: Pope Pius IX
    ...those unfortunate men who belong to, adhere to, and support that sect should be considered as schismatics and separated from communion with the Church.


    Irrelevant, as these people do not shamelessly reject doctrine but are not even aware of it.


    Do you see that you have not addressed the correct point?  Where is your sound logic?  The pope clearly states that all people who are a part of the sect or even support it are to be considered as schismatic.

    Quote from: LoT
    Not relevant as they believe they hold the Catholic faith and are worshipping in Catholic Churches.


    So did the Old "Catholics".  They were still outside the Church.  So did the early Protestants.  They were still outside the Church.  They all believed themselves to be Catholic, and Rome to be the antichrist.  They believed a lie John, and they lost their Cathoicity, their friendship with God, on that account.

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #10 on: November 18, 2009, 12:58:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Catholic Martyr said:
    Quote
    Truly you have demonstrated how BoD is a tool used for no other purpose than to promote salvation outside the Church.  


    If that were so, Catholic Martyr, then how come we didn't see this kind of error, that people could be saved in false religions, in all of the people who read about baptism of desire in Aquinas or Augustine through the centuries?  Why has this particular perversion of EENS only recently sprung up like some new kind of tough, obdurate weed?

    Don't you see that the execrable diffusion of this error has nothing to do with BoD and everything to do with the -- perhaps deliberately -- confusing teachings of Pius IX in Quanta Cura and Quanto Conficiamur Moerere, as well as the Baltimore Catechism?

    Lover of Truth is a soft-hearted guy, and so am I, despite what it may seem like these days.  However I have had to learn not to be soft-hearted when it comes to heresies.  He is like I was a year ago or thereabouts and I don't think he has put together the full devastating picture of what has happened to the Church yet.  He is trying to be accommodating, that is, to compromise, but it is compromise that got us here in the first place.  

    And Lover of Truth, Catholic Martyr believes that certain people are heretics when they aren't, making him materially schismatic, so yes, by his own logic he isn't going to heaven.  We'd better be correct about what we are calling heresies.  However, you may be right to some degree about the confusion of the times coming to our aid.  Since no Pope has ever specifically condemned Feeneyism from the Magisterium, and since it is not de fide to believe in baptism of desire or blood, it might be acceptable to hold his position for the moment.  
    On the other hand, it might not, because unlike NFP, which reared its ugly head right before Vatican II under the communist Pius XII, BoD and BoB have been widely held throughout the history of the Church, by the greatest of Catholic minds ( the aforementioned Aquinas and Augustine as well as Bellarmine ), and no one seems to have called them heresies until Father Feeney, who was a weird guy.  His idea of a joke was to relate the events of Christ's Passion in the voice of Eleanor Roosevelt -- I sincerely question the mindset of anyone who turns the Passion into a topical comedic skit.  

    To call something a heresy when the evidence is so overwhelmingly in favor of it NOT being a heresy, and when it is at the very least an allowed opinion, is the peculiar characteristic of the Feeneyite.  I think Feeneyism is an overreaction to the liberalism of the day; much like Jansenism yet it is different and has its own character.  Jansenism attracted morbid personalities, who seemed to thrive on pain, on the feeling of being sinful and doomed.  The Feeneyites don't have that quality,  or if they do, they are not as public about it ( CM has occasionally expressed doubt about his salvation, but that is not necessarily morbid and can show a healthy mistrust of self and humility ).  They seem to be more contentious.  You will notice that hardly two of them agree on anything, and there is a certain zest with which they throw around the words "heretic" and "schismatic."  But CM is by far the most likable Feeneyite that I have come across.  Maybe certain Feeneyites feel they have to do something extraordinary to be saved, that they have to stand out somehow?  I don't know.  

    Who knows what brings someone to see a heresy where others do not?  Matthew has tried to come up with psychological motives behind my rejection of NFP, but I honestly believe that I am the last person in the world who should have been chosen to expose that heresy.  In fact, I used to be a Manichean in essence and go around telling everyone it was evil to bring children into the world in a time like this.  Suddenly my eyes were opened to how God thinks on this matter, the way He arranged and ordered things for the good of humanity.  NFP contradicts His arrangement and His divine order.  C'est tout.
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #11 on: November 18, 2009, 02:37:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Raoul76 a dogmatic definition is irreformable (de fide), and any proposition which objectively contradicts such a definition, thereby positing a reformation, is to be rejected as heresy.

    This is not Pharisaic, it is the correct response to the infallible teaching authority of the Church.  The pope doesn't fast and mortify himself before making an ex cathedra decree for nothing, nor is he careless in the words he uses, nor is the Spirit of God absent from him at the time of his decree.  The words he speaks are absolutely true and are guided and actively shielded from ALL error by Absolute Truth Himself.

    Frankly, there is more EVIDENCE (from de fide pronouncements) that BoD is heresy than that NFP is heresy - yet they both are.

    Consider BoD and the erroneous doctrine of Pope John XXII - if nobody had ever made any infallible decree treating of the Blessed departed, then the opinion of Pope John would not now be heretical, capable of severing a man from the Church.  But after Benedict XII made his ex cathedra decree on the matter, anyone holding the opinion of Pope John would now be in heresy.

    Likewise after the decrees from Vienne, Florence and Trent, anyone who holds to the previous opinion of various Fathers and Saints, who are fallible human beings remember, whereby a man may be saved who has never formally entered the Church, is in heresy, since this opinion posits a contradiction to the words spoken ex cathedra by various popes, confirming the decrees of the aforementioned councils.

    The difference is that nobody in the Church caused as much of a ruckus with BoD as Pope John XXII did with his erroneous opinion, as to elicit a wide response such as that which Pope John received.

    I say again, this is not "Pharisaic legalism", as some have called it, but fidelity to the definitions of the Holy See, whereby we know what are the objective absolute truths that must be believed.

    Remember, saints can be contradicted if they should later be shown to have been in error, but a Catholic pope speaking ex cathedra cannot have erred, and can never be contradicted by those who would remain Catholic.

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Robert Rawhide
    « Reply #12 on: December 16, 2009, 01:19:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Raoul76
    I'm aware I have a tendency to shut down argument, not inspire it.  That's why I should be a priest, not posting on the Internet, but all the bishops I know of are heretics, so...