I am assuming Dumb Ox has done a lot of research on this long-running soap opera and has come to some definite conclusions. There seems to be much reliance on what Society leaders and bishops said in the past about conciliar Rome and their statements are being used to predict their actions post-preamble. However, these leaders can say different things at different times it appears and the pro-agreement faction is using such uncertainty to minimise the weight of opposition. And saying something at a time when one is safe is quite different to putting oneself on the line. Time will tell whether brave words lead to brave actions.
The Crow is the alternative for Maximillian Krah whose name was banned on Ignis Ardens when it got cold feet over the disclosure of Krahgate, the antics of a Society lawyer and his bevaviour towards Bp. Williamson. Krahgate is still current because this unhealthy juxtaposition is still current. Much like the parallel Rome/Menzingen event.