CathInfo.com

False straw man.  I have repeatedly stated the contrary, that there are undoubtedly many good Catholics in material error only in the Novus Ordo.

If by "in the Novus Ordo" you mean to include Traditional Catholics, you are making the false assumption that they are in material error.

Look, I'm not denying that there are problems in the Church, but what I now know is that it's entirely false to imaging that the real Catholics are on the outside, and only compromisers are within. That is entirely false.  What I am beginning to see is that there's far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads on the outside.  Take the example of episcopal consecration and ordination to the priesthood. Nearly all on the outside doubt the validity of both, when there is not the slightest objective doubt about either.   Why all the confusion and doubt?  It's definitely not due to any sound doctrinal reasons, since no one could give me any when I asked (unless I missed it).

I even believe that there are some hierarchs who too are in material error only and therefore legitimately exercise jurisdiction.  

You just contradicted yourself.  How can they have jurisdiction if they belong to a false Church?  They can't.  You just implicitly admitted that you believe the entity you call the Conciliar Church is really the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation.  

Just check my posting history.  You made this allegation up out of thin air.  Not everyone is a radical dogmatic sedevacantist like you appear to have been.  Evidently you swung from one extreme back to the other extreme, unable to find the appropriate distinctions to prevent your pendulum swing.

I've never been a sedevacantist, and the only thing my pendulum had done is gradually stop swinging.  It now rests atop and is firmly held in place by traditional doctrine.

If by "in the Novus Ordo" you mean to include Traditional Catholics, you are making the false assumption that they are in material error.

Look, I'm not denying that there are problems in the Church, but what I now know is that it's entirely false to imaging that the real Catholics are on the outside, and only compromisers are within. That is entirely false.  What I am beginning to see is that there's far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads on the outside.  Take the example of episcopal consecration and ordination to the priesthood. Nearly all on the outside doubt the validity of both, when there is not the slightest objective doubt about either.   Why all the confusion and doubt?  It's definitely not due to any sound doctrinal reasons, since no one could give me any when I asked (unless I missed it).


 You just contradicted yourself.  How can they have jurisdiction if they belong to a false Church?  They can't.  You just implicitly admitted that you believe the entity you call the Conciliar Church is really the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation.  


I've never been a sedevacantist, and the only thing my pendulum had done is gradually stop swinging.  It now rests atop and is firmly held in place by traditional doctrine.

“there’s far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads”? Oh really?
 You lost all credibility with me with that statement.....what a dolt! Get lost!