The Sun of the Church's brilliance is hidden behind the moon of corrupt men, who have temporarily blocked its light from shining.

Poor allegory because St. Louis DeMontfort likened Christ as the sun Whose brightness is tempored by Blessed Mary as the moon for sinners who need her guidance, just as a people need the moon's light to trek through darkness because they can't trek by day as they can't endure the powerful rays of the sun, much like the sinner's hideous soul and guilt can't stand the Light of Christ. So Blessed Mary's gentle light, which is the Light of Christ shining through her, leads sinners to grace and salvation, if they heed her motherly guidance.

One Pope over 2,isn't that laughable?!  Define pope, first.  Then, say, "he will hate one and love the other."  He can not be master of both (Church that Christ founded and Man-made conciliar.

 

Poor allegory because St. Louis DeMontfort likened Christ as the sun Whose brightness is tempored by Blessed Mary as the moon for sinners who need her guidance, just as a people need the moon's light to trek through darkness because they can't trek by day as they can't endure the powerful rays of the sun, much like the sinner's hideous soul and guilt can't stand the Light of Christ. So Blessed Mary's gentle light, which is the Light of Christ shining through her, leads sinners to grace and salvation, if they heed her motherly guidance.

The sun and moon are used allegorically in many different ways by the saints and mystics.  

One of the unintended consequences of being a schismatic is a false comprehension ecclesiastical of reality.  I know because I used to have the same erroneous mindset.  You imagine that everyone in the "Conciliar Church" is a modernist heretic, and think refusal to be in union with the Church is a mark of orthodoxy.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  

What showed me that the mindset is false is experiential knowledge. Without that, I would probably be as blind as you are to the reality.

False straw man.  I have repeatedly stated the contrary, that there are undoubtedly many good Catholics in material error only in the Novus Ordo.  I even believe that there are some hierarchs who too are in material error only and therefore legitimately exercise jurisdiction.  Just check my posting history.  You made this allegation up out of thin air.  Not everyone is a radical dogmatic sedevacantist like you appear to have been.  Evidently you swung from one extreme back to the other extreme, unable to find the appropriate distinctions to prevent your pendulum swing.

False straw man.  I have repeatedly stated the contrary, that there are undoubtedly many good Catholics in material error only in the Novus Ordo.  I even believe that there are some hierarchs who too are in material error only and therefore legitimately exercise jurisdiction.  Just check my posting history.  You made this allegation up out of thin air.  Not everyone is a radical dogmatic sedevacantist like you appear to have been.  Evidently you swung from one extreme back to the other extreme, unable to find the appropriate distinctions to prevent your pendulum swing.

👍 It appears that he’s not a good reader.

False straw man.  I have repeatedly stated the contrary, that there are undoubtedly many good Catholics in material error only in the Novus Ordo.

If by "in the Novus Ordo" you mean to include Traditional Catholics, you are making the false assumption that they are in material error.

Look, I'm not denying that there are problems in the Church, but what I now know is that it's entirely false to imaging that the real Catholics are on the outside, and only compromisers are within. That is entirely false.  What I am beginning to see is that there's far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads on the outside.  Take the example of episcopal consecration and ordination to the priesthood. Nearly all on the outside doubt the validity of both, when there is not the slightest objective doubt about either.   Why all the confusion and doubt?  It's definitely not due to any sound doctrinal reasons, since no one could give me any when I asked (unless I missed it).

I even believe that there are some hierarchs who too are in material error only and therefore legitimately exercise jurisdiction.  

You just contradicted yourself.  How can they have jurisdiction if they belong to a false Church?  They can't.  You just implicitly admitted that you believe the entity you call the Conciliar Church is really the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation.  

Just check my posting history.  You made this allegation up out of thin air.  Not everyone is a radical dogmatic sedevacantist like you appear to have been.  Evidently you swung from one extreme back to the other extreme, unable to find the appropriate distinctions to prevent your pendulum swing.

I've never been a sedevacantist, and the only thing my pendulum had done is gradually stop swinging.  It now rests atop and is firmly held in place by traditional doctrine.

If by "in the Novus Ordo" you mean to include Traditional Catholics, you are making the false assumption that they are in material error.

Look, I'm not denying that there are problems in the Church, but what I now know is that it's entirely false to imaging that the real Catholics are on the outside, and only compromisers are within. That is entirely false.  What I am beginning to see is that there's far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads on the outside.  Take the example of episcopal consecration and ordination to the priesthood. Nearly all on the outside doubt the validity of both, when there is not the slightest objective doubt about either.   Why all the confusion and doubt?  It's definitely not due to any sound doctrinal reasons, since no one could give me any when I asked (unless I missed it).


 You just contradicted yourself.  How can they have jurisdiction if they belong to a false Church?  They can't.  You just implicitly admitted that you believe the entity you call the Conciliar Church is really the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is no salvation.  


I've never been a sedevacantist, and the only thing my pendulum had done is gradually stop swinging.  It now rests atop and is firmly held in place by traditional doctrine.

“there’s far more error, heresy and confusion among Trads”? Oh really?
 You lost all credibility with me with that statement.....what a dolt! Get lost!