Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Response to Nishants latest post  (Read 470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Disputaciones

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1667
  • Reputation: +472/-178
  • Gender: Male
Response to Nishants latest post
« on: March 12, 2016, 01:27:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am not "Catholictrue" but I want to answer to what you said.

    Quote from: Nishant
    Catholic true, you claim to know Pope Francis is a formal heretic exactly how? First of all the Doctors teach that it is only in his capacity as a private Theologian and not in the exercise of Magisterium that the Roman Pontiff can fall into heresy.


    And yet the conciliar popes have taught heresy in the exercise of the Magisterium.

    How do you explain that?

    Quote from: Nishant
    In this case Catholics are to complain to the Cardinals and the diocesan bishops to whom alone it pertains to determine his pertinacity or lack thereof in error.


    They are all modernist heretics just like the Conciliar popes, and some are even worse than them.

    Will you go complain to Muller then, the head of the CDF? Who is your local novus ordo bishop? Have you complained to him?

    Quote from: Nishant
    He alone loses the pontificate who gives manifest evidence of public pertinacity.


    The conciliar popes have given ample evidence of pertinacity. They were rebuked and resisted from the beginning, and they are self-professed modernists to boot.

    Quote from: Nishant
    In this way the Pope who fell into error on souls not seeing God before the final judgement was corrected, retracted his error and retained the pontificate since he was only a Catholic erring in good faith and not a heretic properly so called.


    This had not been defined yet nor condemned as an error, so he couldn't have been a HERETIC anyway, and the pope was merely expressing his private opinion, saying he would subject himself to the Church, unlike the conciliar popes, who have instead TAUGHT all their already infallibly condemned errors through the Magisterium to the entire Church.

    There is no comparison at all between the case of Pope Nicholas and the conciliar popes, not even close.

    Quote from: Nishant
    In Secret of the Rosary St Montfort says that whoever says his Rosary every day (Pope Francis prays three decades every day as is well known) will never become a formal heretic.


    I would suppose this obviously presupposes that the person praying it has a TRUE devotion and is of good will and devout, something which no conciliar pope has been.

    How many people are there today, who pray the Rosary daily, and yet have seared consciences, are completely mundane and of the world, and live lives of unrepentant mortal sin? I know MANY such people, even novus ordo priests.

    If you purposely choose to live a life of sin and deliberately put obstacles in the way of grace, it won't matter how many Rosaries you pray.

    But I don't believe the conciliar popes are(were) devout anyway or that Bergoglio really prays the Rosary daily. They are modernist infiltrators who know what they're doing.

    Bergoglio is even on record ridiculing devotion and traditional practices, specifically the Rosary itself!


    Offline Desmond

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 623
    • Reputation: +13/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Response to Nishants latest post
    « Reply #1 on: March 14, 2016, 01:43:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Good post.