What is wrong with the hyperlinks?

The “Team Bergoglio” Scandal
https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/25/team-bergoglio-scandal/

Rome — Dec. 25, 2014: Since the scandal regarding Team Bergoglio broke, the From Rome blog has assiduously followed the news and studied what the consequences have been.  On that account more than 25,000 visitors from more than 120 countries have visited this blog to find the news that was not being summarized or published elsewhere.

“Team Bergoglio” is the name given by Dr. Austen Ivereigh, former spokesman to His Eminence, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, ex-Archbishop of Westminster, England, to the group of Cardinals who campaigned for Cardinal Bergoglio in the 2013 Conclave.

The Scandalous consequences of the revelations of Dr. Ivereigh’s book, can be summed up thus: Dr. Ivereigh has written a book alleging as many as 30 cardinals did that which is apparently a violation of the papal law on conclaves, on which account they would be ipso facto excommunicated, Cardinal Bergoglio included, and the election of the latter by 2013 Conclave be null and void and of no effect. — As of this date, no substantial denial has been made by anyone of the accused, and Dr. Ivereigh has not substantially withdrawn, changed, or altered what he wrote.

To continue to assist Catholics and journalists world-wide who wish to know more about this scandal, we present here a summary and links through which readers can grasp the basic and detailed facts of the case which has arisen.

First, our article, The Chronology of Reports on “Team Bergoglio” https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/the-chronology-of-reports-on-team-bergoglio/ , contains the master-list of all the news reports of note and blog posts, videos, audios, tweets, etc. which regard crucial information or analysis of the story: this list is in Chronological order according to the date the information was published or presented.

But since the Chronology has already grown to 8 pages in length, for those wishing to grasp the facts, we suggest the following articles:

• The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making of Radical Pope https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/09/the-great-reformer-francis-and-the-making-of-a-radical-pope/ , which explains just what Dr. Austen Ivereigh has written in his new book, of the same title, about who did what before and during the Conclave of 2013.

• The Improbity of the denials by “Team Bergoglio” https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/the-improbity-of-team-bergoglios-recent-denials/ , which explains just what some of the Cardinals, alleged by Ivereigh to have engaged in vote-canvassing, have and have not denied. An analysis which shows the probability that Cardinal Bergoglio consented to and/or organized the effort.

• The Monstrosity of Allegations against “Team Bergoglio” = Cardinal Bergoglio is not the pope https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/the-monstrosity-of-the-allegations-against-team-bergoglio-cardinal-bergoglio-is-not-the-pope/ , which explains the canonical consequences of the violation of the Papal law on conclaves, which Ivereigh’s text apparently convicts Cardinal Bergoglio of.

• 4 Ways the “Team Bergoglio” revelations undo Francis’ Papacy https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/4-ways-the-team-bergoglio-revelations-undo-francis-papacy/ , which is an editorial explaining the grave implications for the Church stemming from the scandal, be it true or not.

• No, your Eminence, the Church is not a tyranny! https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/no-your-eminence-the-church-is-not-a-tyranny/ , which rebuts the gross indifference of 1 Cardinal of the Roman Church to the scandal and pointedly indicates the grave Crisis into which the Catholic Church has been placed by the undenied allegations.
The other articles which reports facts of lesser interest, though important of themselves, can be found in the Chronology article link above.

Quote from: Mark 79

The Scandalous consequences of the revelations of Dr. Ivereigh’s book, can be summed up thus: Dr. Ivereigh has written a book alleging as many as 30 cardinals did that which is apparently a violation of the papal law on conclaves, on which account they would be ipso facto excommunicated, Cardinal Bergoglio included, and the election of the latter by 2013 Conclave be null and void and of no effect. — As of this date, no substantial denial has been made by anyone of the accused, and Dr. Ivereigh has not substantially withdrawn, changed, or altered what he wrote.

I remember Bishop Faure say in one of his conferences that Pope Pius XII made a reform to Canon Law that said something along the lines of "Any bishop who is excommunicated may assume the Papacy".  Does anyone here know where or if this reform can be found on the net?

If Pope Pius XII made such a reform, does this not blow to smithereens the ideals people have of Bergoglio not being pope? Also, from what I understand, most Sedevacantists consider Pius XII the last true pope. If the pope made such a reform, does this not mean that every pope after him must be recognized?

Opinions?

“For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by His revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or Deposit of Faith transmitted by the Apostles.” — Pastor Aeternus

Such a weaponized "reform" would hardly guard the Faith. Such a deformation would heap heresy upon heresy. I am skeptical that Pope Pius XII would do such a thing, but am willing to consider any solid evidence.

Quote from: Pope Pius XII, Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis, 1945).

“None of the Cardinals may, by pretext or reason of any excommunication, suspension, or interdict whatsoever, or of any other ecclesiastical impediment, be excluded from the active and passive election of the Supreme Pontiff”

w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/la/apost_constitutions/docuмents/hf_p-xii_apc_19451208_vacantis-apostolicae-sedis.html

This isn't relevant.  What we'd need to know is what conclave rules were in effect before 2013.  If the rules stipulate that such collusion would render the results null and void, then the election would have been null and void.

Consider this, in order to be excommunicated one must be a Catholic in the first place.  A member of the Church.  It doesn't make sense that the Church can excommunicate a non-member of the Catholic Church.

 I am sure someone will explain to me why my thinking is flawed.