.
True religious liberty in our time properly understood means
one thing only:
.
Catholics have the right to worship God in public, in the open, officially, for all to see, using the Traditional Latin Mass and all associated rituals.
.
Of course, there are Catholic rites besides the Roman Latin rite, and these others (Greek, Armenian, Aramaic, Russian, etc.) are likewise okay.
.
At the same time, neither Catholics or non-Catholics have the right to pretend to PUBLICLY worship God (or anything else) in other ways.
.
That means that Lutheran, Mormon, Seventh-Day Adventist, Buddhist, Hindu, Jєωιѕн, Mohammedan, Zoroastrian or any other sects have no such right.
.
They would be worshiping God (or whatever) in ways that are not Catholic, and they are not at liberty to publicly do so, under true religious liberty.
.
Only the one true faith has the liberty to be practiced in public, and since the Catholic Church is the one true faith, it must be public.
.
But you won't find a word of that in
Dignitatis Humanae, and as such it is an abominable desecration of the Church's authority in the world.
.
Consequently we can logically take this one step further, to say that inasmuch as the Novus Ordo you-name-it complies and agrees with Vat.II --
everything Novus Ordo is tantamount to
DH from the viewpoint of traditional Catholicism, and must be opposed with our heart, mind and will.
.
This means that the Novus Ordo ceremonies you see published coming out of the Vatican on Christmas, etc., are all fake, non-Catholic and abominable.
.
If you think this is too "harsh" what do you have to say about the laws for religious public practice in Moslem countries, such as Saudi Arabia?
.
.
Go back now, and read
trad123's post regarding the words of Pope Leo XIII, keeping ^ this ^ in mind, and see what difference it makes.
.