With the addition of the rejoinder at the bottom of every page of Cathinfo that basically turns everyone here  into a h0Ɩ0cαųst denier, my positon is as follows.
I do not agree that the h0Ɩ0cαųst is a myth but as a first amendment issue it needs to be 'tolerated'. Although Voltaire was a moron, he didn't have everything wrong and his wisdom about disagreeing with what one says but leaving him the right to say it is basically mine.

Even the infamous Alex VI let Savanarola pronounce the worst calumnies against the Pope.

Here is America it is permitted to blaspheme the Holy Catholic Church. If that is so then h0Ɩ0cαųst discussion must be allowed.

At any rate, Williamson will eventually recant and leave me with the same doubts I have always had about SSPX

Two of the main sources in  Mrs Martinez Undermining Of The Cath Church are Lefevbre and Williamson. One wonders where the accusations re: the Pacelli family come from-- I was mistakenly  convinced of the nefarious nature of Pius XII for quite some time. A perusal of  Felisini's Le Finanze Pontifice E I Rothschild, yields no mention of the Pacelli name.  The same is true of Pollard's(J) Money And The Modern Papacy-- there is no mention of a Pacelli working in the Rothschild Bank in this work as well( although Ernesto Pacelli is the go between for a couple of loans that Pius IX is forced to take). It seems to me now that Mrs Martinez attack on Pius XII is unjust-- not to mention the calumnies against the great Card Rampolla which is nothing less than an assault on the characters of Leo XIII, Pius X and Merry Del Val.

Accusations that Lefevbre was a mason are being made by a poster( Rita--Cherished Heart) at reasonradionetwork. Also no answer has been forthcoming to my request to know who the other bishop was( besides the mason Lienart) at the consecration of Lefevbre.

Fact is that SSPX recognises the v2 'popes'

Correction and clarification on Pollard's book-- there is mention of Rothschild of course but what is not there is the accusation Marcantonio Pacelli actually worked in the Rothschild bank( Ernesto is not born yet). Pollard also makes no mention that Pacelli was even involved in the 1832 loan Greg XVI is forced to take from Rothschild much less actually working in the bank.

Mrs Martinez is not specific as to her source when writing these things.