http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/sanborn-conference-audios.htm

Refreshing Catholic Truth...

Recent Conferences by Bishop Sanborn:
bp-donald-sanborn.jpg


The Great Apostasy, Vatican II, the Novus Ordo Church, and Sedevacantism


In these first few months of 2016, sedevacantist Bishop Donald Sanborn has done some traveling and given conferences on true Catholicism, the changes introduced by the Second Vatican Council, and the current state of “Catholicism” in the Novus Ordo Church. The audio recordings of these highly informative talks have now been made available by His Excellency to the general public and can be downloaded or streamed free of charge below.

Bp. Sanborn is rector of Most Holy Trinity Seminary in Brooksville, Florida. He is a frequent guest on various radio programs produced by True Restoration. In 2004, His Excellency engaged in a public debate with Dr. Robert Fastiggi, a representative of the Novus Ordo religion, regarding Vatican II’s ecclesiology. The passionate debate and a follow-up conference can be watched here.

Below, find the audios of Bp. Sanborn’s most recent conferences:


Vatican II: A Substantial Change of the Catholic Religion
(by Bp. Donald J. Sanborn; delivered in Budapest, Hungary, 2016)
Direct download: Budapest_Conference_Sanborn_2016.mp3



The Novus Ordo Church, Vatican II, and Sedevacantism
— A Complete Overview of the Great Apostasy
(by Bp. Donald J. Sanborn; delivered in Fresno, California, 2016)
Direct download: FresnoTalkSanborn2016.mp3



Questions & Answers
(by Bp. Donald J. Sanborn; delivered in Fresno, California, 2016)
Direct download: Q_26_A_Fresno_Sanborn_2016.mp3



For more free audios published by Most Holy Trinity Seminary, including weekly sermons by various truly Catholic clerics, access the seminary’s sermon & podcast page here.

Unrelated to Bp. Sanborn’s conferences, but still related to the topic of Catholic Traditionalism, we have produced a brief video clip entitled: “Just how traditional are today’s mainstream Traditionalists?” Have a look and see how the people who are at the forefront of what is taken for Traditional Catholicsm somehow always manage to ignore the traditional Catholic doctrine on the Papacy and the Magisterium — for the simple reason that it contradicts their position:


Yes, today’s mainstream “Traditionalists” are very untraditional when it comes to adhering to the traditional teaching on the Papacy and the Magisterium. Or when was the last time you heard the SSPX, John Vennari, John Salza, Chris Ferrara, or any other of these self-appointed “resisters” quote this:

Nor can we pass over in silence the audacity of those who, not enduring sound doctrine, contend that “without sin and without any sacrifice of the Catholic profession assent and obedience may be refused to those judgments and decrees of the Apostolic See, whose object is declared to concern the Church's general good and her rights and discipline, so only it does not touch the dogmata of faith and morals.” But no one can be found not clearly and distinctly to see and understand how grievously this is opposed to the Catholic dogma of the full power given from God by Christ our Lord Himself to the Roman Pontiff of feeding, ruling and guiding the Universal Church.

(Pope Pius IX, Encyclical Quanta Cura, n. 5; underlining added.)


The truth is that because of their stubborn refusal to accept the fact that Francis and his five predecessors have been anti-Catholic usurpers rather than true Catholic Popes, they must ignore, minimize, reject, or distort the traditional Catholic teaching on submission to the Pope. But it is impossible, nay insane, to attempt to save Catholic Tradition by rejecting Catholic Tradition. It is like trying to borrow one’s way out of debt — an obvious contradiction.

This error, among others, is the reason why they are spinning their wheels trying to “resist” a false church until it magically turns into the Catholic Church. Such a senseless attempt is doomed to failure, being built not on the rock of Catholic principle but on the sand of wishful thinking promoted by skilled rhetoricians and gifted journalists (cf. Mt 7:24-27).

Related Links:

    Sedevacantism: Bp. Sanborn destroys Bp. Williamson
    More Catholic than the Pope? The Remnant, Francis, and Sedevacantism
    The Impossibility of Judging or Deposing a True Pope
    False Resistance Theology: The Pope Speaks, YOU Decide
    Have the Gates of Hell Prevailed against the Catholic Church?
    Sedevacantism and Private Judgment: Are Sedevacantists just “Protestants”?
    Proving Sedevacantism: An Easy-to-Follow Syllogistic Argument
    Do Catholics only need to believe what was taught “always, everywhere, by all”?
    The Truth about Pope Liberius
    Is Francis a valid Pope? Why the Question Matters
    You Can't Have It “Your Way”: Response to Fr. Francois Chazal on Sedevacantism
    Resistance and Indefectibility: Where is the Church?
    The Apostasy of John Paul II: A Catholic Response
    Pope Leo XIII condemns Recognize-and-Resist Position
    Traditional Catholics and Devotion to the Pope: Can we “Recognize and Resist”? (Audio)
    The Errors of the Society of Saint Pius X (Audio)
    The Ordinary Magisterium and Devotion to the Pope (Audio)
    Michael Davies: An Evaluation (The Neo-Trads’ celebrated champion and pioneer thoroughly refuted)
    SSPX/Resistance vs. Sedevacantism: Collection of Links to Resources

i have listened to Bishop sanborn. i agree with his assessment on novus ordo and the resistance crowd. However, have any of these priests such as sanborn and dolan ever been subject to papal discipline? they have no pope to tell them they cannot use the roman missal from before the 1955 holy week changes from Pius XII.CMRI uses the marian missal that incorporates the changes but was issued before john xxIII made his changes. I have no problem with using a missal prior to the bugnini revisions such as th st andrews 1945 or something.
on the issue of resisting a valid pope I have no idea. that would require some research on the conditions under which it is permissible, if there are any.

I am for the pre bugnini changes but if Pius XII or some other valid Pope were alive today and enforcing the liturgy of 1958 there would be no legitimate reason to go against that as that would be clear disobedience to legitimate authority.  

That is a difference between SVs and the R & Rs.  The R and Rs make the big jump of disobeying the head of the universal Church while the SVs (in the official theological stance) disobey no living legitimate authority and simply continue to be Catholic.