Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Red Alert! Are the Sedevacantists the Only True Followers of Abp. Lefebvre?  (Read 23709 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Please explain how this causes more division ... apart from making the dogmatic sedeplenists uncomfortable.  But the latter will deny it anyway, as the Bishop himself suggested.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Just stop for a moment and think about this, Texana.
Here we are, over 30 years since the Archbishop died, and we are learning from one of the 'defectors' from the Archbishop's Society/Resistance, one who never knew the Archbishop; we are learning from him what no one until now ever knew???
The entire Society of the Archbishop, the bishops in whom he confided, the superior general, all the priests and the faithful - we have all been deceived???
Now I ask you, how likely is that?
I don't say that Rev Roy or Fr Epiney are deliberately distorting the truth, but certainly somewhere along the line there is a misunderstanding to say the very least.
Here we see, once again, a great testimony to the great churchman that was Archbishop Lefebvre: he attracts all, even those who hold different opinions from his - they want to see their beliefs justified by him, such a universally recognised good shepherd and saviour of the Church that he was.

This.

I don't think Fr. Roy, who was ordained in what, 2012? has "discovered" such a thing that wasn't already common knowledge.'

Nice clickbait title, BTW.

What's next? Talking about "one weird trick"? or "10 Things Trads don't know. Number 7 will blow your mind!"


Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
The una cuм debate is a made up line-in-the-sand position and causes senseless division.  There is no such thing as an una-cuм Trad.  Or a non-una-cuм Trad.  It’s a theological fairytale.  And it’s pathetic. 

Dear CathInfo Friends,

Please don't shoot the messenger!  I posted this video without any personal comments or opinions for your information only!  Are we to be penalized for submitting new, possibly important information now?

Why would we not want more true, valid priests and bishops to bring the real Sacraments to us?

What Bishop Roy stated about "non una cuм" does correspond with a certain pattern in Archbishop Lefebvre's manifest understanding of the Crisis.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
The una cuм debate is a made up line-in-the-sand position and causes senseless division.  There is no such thing as an una-cuм Trad.  Or a non-una-cuм Trad.  It’s a theological fairytale.  And it’s pathetic.

"una cuм" isn't the point of this ... other than as an indication of how +Lefebvre may have warmed up to sedevacantism in his last days.  Not all "non-una-cuм" types are dogmatic "non-una-cuм".  I feel that this is a mistake that's being made regularly the past few days here.