Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27

Author Topic: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line  (Read 3290 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line
« Reply #90 on: May 14, 2026, 02:29:33 PM »
Quote from: Everlast22 on May 14, 2026, 02:03:20 PM
You are one pompous little autist. lol
Projection
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line
« Reply #91 on: May 14, 2026, 02:30:06 PM »
Quote from: Lazarus on May 14, 2026, 02:03:50 PM
Had Bp Lefebvre seen the "pontificate" of Bergoglio, I think he would have become a sedevacantist.
Certainly never a Thucist though
Logged

Offline Everlast22

  • Supporter
Re: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line
« Reply #92 on: May 14, 2026, 02:30:12 PM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on May 14, 2026, 02:29:33 PM
Projection
Straight truth, not projection. You need your ass severely whipped by your dad.
Logged

Offline DecemRationis

  • Supporter
Re: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line
« Reply #93 on: May 14, 2026, 02:32:47 PM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on May 14, 2026, 12:48:37 PM
In that case it is the resistance Masses that count.

Should I dare clarify? Yeah, what the hell.

My comment was as to your logical fallacy of equating "no Mass = left as orphans." I guess, more accurately, your analogy was "no valid bishops or priests = left as orphans."

Well, the priest-less and Mass-less Japanese Catholics were never left by Christ as "orphans," or do you think so? That simple fact of history gives your equation an F in Math.

So far I've seen two anti-Thuc line members misread comments to my posts in one day, one intellectually, one emotionally . . . and I don't post much.

What was that you said to me in another of your "spot on" comments? "Not a good look," I think.

That's not a good look for the anti-Thuc line.
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: Reason No. 3452 to not trust the Thuc line
« Reply #94 on: May 14, 2026, 02:34:40 PM »
Quote from: DecemRationis on May 14, 2026, 02:32:47 PM
Should I dare clarify? Yeah, what the hell.

My comment was as to your logical fallacy of equating "no Mass = left as orphans." I guess, more accurately, your analogy was "no valid bishops or priests = left as orphans."

Well, the priest-less and Mass-less Japanese Catholics were never left by Christ as "orphans," or do you think so? That simple fact of history gives your equation an F in Math.

So far I've seen two anti-Thuc line members misread comments to my posts in one day, one intellectually, one emotionally . . . and I don't post much.

What was that you said to me in another of your "spot on" comments? "Not a good look, I think."

That's not a good look for the anti-Thuc line.
Thuc most likely simulated a Sacrament, which casts doubt over everything he did. Particularly because he was not stable
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27
« previous next »