Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Re-evaluating La Sallette  (Read 4169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trinity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3233
  • Reputation: +189/-0
  • Gender: Female
Re-evaluating La Sallette
« on: September 20, 2010, 06:45:15 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "Rome Will Lose The Faith and Become the Seat of Anti-Christ"
    This is the controversial belief of those who have not studied the history of LaSallette.

    ( -the above statement was originally made by the heretic Martin Luther in 1540 AD)

    (Article copied from:http://members.lycos.co.uk/jloughnan/salquote.htm)

    Compiled by: F. John Loughnan
    CLARIFICATION: To circuмvent any misunderstanding - let me make it clear that I concur with the Bishop of Grenoble's decision regarding the original apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary at La Salette in 1846, that the apparition is "worthy of belief." The intent of these articles is to demonstrate that a) the true message" and/or b) "the secret" of La Salette does NOT form an integral part of that Bishop's (or the Church's) approval. The false message or secret suggests that the BVM prophecies  that "Rome will lose the Faith...etc.".  This rumor is an 1879 corruption of the original and legitimate message recorded in 1851. This corrupted 1879 "message" and/or "secret" has been absolutely condemned by the Church. The official condemnation culminated with the false message of LaSalette being placed on the Index of Forbidden Books,  the questionable Imprimatur of 1879 supposedly granted by the Bishop of Lecce notwithstanding. - F. John Loughnan
    On January 27, 2002 I received a "yelling" e-mail from an anonymous person 1 in New Zealand claiming to be "Catholic Action" at <catholicaction@actrix.co.nz> Some of this report is an answer to his objection, and to many like it.

    Questionable Premise:

    "ROME WILL LOSE THE FAITH AND BECOME THE SEAT OF ANTICHRIST"
    -- Martin Luther: 1540 AD. / Condemned LaSallette Message: 1879

    Unfortunately, we see here an actual example of the "blind" leading the "blind".

    Let us consider the following:

    The above statement is slavishly accepted and promoted, by many deluded people - almost as if it is "a matter of Faith" that the Blessed Virgin Mary spoke those words to Melanie Mathieu/Calvat and Maximin Giraud at La Salette.

    Were these words spoken by the Virgin Mary all those years ago? Or were they, they repetitions by an innocent Melanie of the apocalyptic ravings of convincing but deluded fanatics who succeeded in confusing her? (E.G. Martin Luther developed the penchant for calling the pope the anti-Christ.) It is important to understand that Melanie NEVER mentioned this phrase when she first communicated the message in 1851. This phrase only  began to be attributed to her after 1878 - long after the actual event happened, and the official message had been recorded.

    Stephen Hand, Editor of TCR News ran an article on the subject by Brother Thomas Mary Sennot, who is a Benedictine at the St. Benedict Abbey, in Still River. Here is an extract:

    "Brother Michael Dimond ... like a man in the grip of a dream"
    by Brother Thomas Mary Sennot

    "...I had just finished rereading for the third time Chesterton's St. Thomas Aquinas, and I realized that I had at hand the perfect rebuttal. But let me dispose of two points first. Our Lady at La Salette did not say, "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of Antichrist." The message of La Salette was against working on Sundays and the profanation of the Holy Name of Jesus. Our Lady at this time gave a secret to each of the two seers, Maximin Giraud and Melanie Mathieu, which they were forbidden to reveal. They later wrote them out to be read only by Pope Pius IX. Despite this prohibition, Melanie, much later, decided to publish what purported to be her "secret" on her own, which was so sensational that it brought great discredit to the apparition itself. On December 21, 1915 the Holy Office forbade further publication or discussion of Melanie's revelations (for more on this see article at http://freespace.virgin.net/crc.english/salette.htm) The caption on this tract, "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of Antichrist," is actually by Martin Luther, and was developed at great length by one of his first disciples, Flacius Illyricus, in his "Centuries of Magdeburg." This preposterous theory was ably refuted by St. Peter Canisius, Baronius, and others.

    The second point I would like to make is that the author of this tract, Bro. Michael Dimond, O.S.B., is not a Benedictine, nor is his Holy Family Monastery in Fillimore, New York, a Benedictine monastery. You will not find this monastery in any Benedictine Ordo, or in any Catholic Directory. You don't become a Benedictine by simply saying you're one, like some Anglicans have tried to do."

    Refer 1: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/3251/genarticle5.html
     
     

    Refer 2:
    From: the Abbe de Nantes site: http://freespace.virgin.net/crc.english/salette.htm

    "THE TRUTH ABOUT THE SECRET OF LA SALETTE
    "..., the true Secret of La Salette has never been made public. Many Catholics sadly continue to be misled by the false and unapproved 'secret' drawn up by an embittered Melanie Calvat in 1879, a gross distortion of the original version she wrote in 1851. Others, despite their good will, have simply felt unable to give it their credence - providentially it would seem.

    This article, taken from the July-August 1996 edition of the CRC, will inspire all those who love Our Lady by helping them to glimpse something of Her real Secret beneath Melanie Calvat's distortions."

    Here is a portion from MELANIE'S WRITINGS (same source):
    http://freespace.virgin.net/crc.english/salette4.htm#apocalypse

    "It is mad

    For the cinema grows from year to year until the sensational publication of 1879, when this Secret will be manipulated by all sorts of people, who will find in it an opportunity to make a case against Rome, to doom the cardinals and bishops to hell, often in order to settle personal scores. Following the example of Melanie, moreover.

    In fact, Melanie yields to prophetic delirium, taken from the Old Testament then from Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort. She furiously spits out her personal hatreds, which she nurtures; she is fierce against those many priests and bishops who rebuffed her - the bad priests because they were bad, the good ones because they found the Secret revolting! Whence 'the priests are a cesspool of iniquity'.

    Likewise, her political ideas are dictated by her passions: Mgr Ginoulhiac was favorable to Napoleon III, he chased her out of Corenc, therefore she is opposed to Napoleon III! who was 'a two-faced being!' But she did not reveal that before Napoleon III was known! Had she been very intelligent, or very inspired, she could have said that from 2 December 1851!

    She lies and pre-dates the oracles with which she fills out her Secret. Beware! All her dates are thought to be prophetic, but they are post eventum prophecies, for the phrase which authorizes publication 'in 1858' is added after the event! in 1870 or 1878, after Lourdes, in order to draw attention to herself. There is no doubt that such post eventum prophecies were customary among the Jєωιѕн prophets: for example, Daniel begins by recounting a past history, in a prophetic mode, in order to capture his reader's attention, but when he comes to the actual event, he continues his prophecies by announcing the future.

    She too continues, but by announcing and piling up catastrophes, one lot more disastrous than the next. It is neither Catholic nor worthy of the Blessed Virgin, as all good souls have understood: the saints, Saint Pius X, Cardinal de Cabrihres who remained absolutely calm throughout this brawl and practiced the discernment of spirits. Here are the last pages of the masterly letter by this cardinal whose testimony in favor of the Apparition of La Salette we have already quoted (cf. supra, p. 6) dated 1 July 1915:

    THE COUNTERFEIT VERSION OF OUR LADY'S SECRET
    It is this secret, already several times printed, distributed, commented on and recommended by various authors, both ecclesiastical and lay, that M. Mariavi has thought fit to give to the public, presenting it as 'The Gospel of the Virgin Mary', to accompany and complement the Gospel of Jesus Christ!
    "In order to answer your question Monseigneur, I have just read the two pamphlets concerning which you desire to know my opinion. It is absolutely unfavorable. The authors of previous publications, to do with this secret, were condemned, if not because of the secret itself, at least because of the scope and the consequences they gave it. A similar fate awaits this present publication.

    " I. - It seems, in fact, that we do not have here the secret handed by the Bishop of Grenoble's envoys to HH Pope Pius IX in 1851. In its present form, it was written by Melanie Calvat, but on various occasions and in successive fragments, and seems rather to be the result of a personal composition than an exact repetition of the original text given to Pius IX, and which is said to be no longer in the Vatican.

    " II. - As it stands, this secret has no value other than as Melanie Calvat's personal statement, supported by the signature of two bishops from around Naples. Melanie seems to have been sincerely pious, but she may have been deluded, and it seems that her 'mission', instead of extending to our period, ended with the Church's recognition of the reality of the Apparition.

    " III. - What is certain, according to a well informed author, is that the first versions of the secret were less developed than the last; it is probable, therefore, that under the influence of the setting in which her life ended, Melanie amplified the first form of the writing she had had sent to the Pope; for certain, we do not have here an official copy of the secret handed to Pius IX. Only the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office could, with the Pope's consent, seek out the original and so determine, against the original contents, its true authority.

    " IV. - The nature of this secret, as we read it today, is so strange, arranged in such a confused manner, containing particular allusions to politics, it seems to favor, in such a very precise way, the errors of the ancient millenarists - in that it announces a renovation to be accomplished in time and on earth, unlike the teaching of the true religion about the general resurrection at the end of the world, and about the eternal happiness of the elect - that one necessarily hesitates to ascribe it a heavenly origin. Finally, and more especially, the commentator has taken such liberty in evaluating and judging the Catholic hierarchy, in all its degrees, that one wonders what basis there is for the severity of his words, which would not be out of place in the pages of a newspaper most hostile to the Christian faith. One also wonders how he allies the true piety he professes with the harshness he displays towards persons worthy of every respect.

    "What aggravates the rashness of these judgments is that they are, on several occasions, given in a form that is both mocking and insulting, which is belied by the character and dignity of the persons the author sees fit to denounce.

    "The holy pope Pius IX, venerable cardinals such as Mgr Perraud, Mgr Lugon and Mgr Sevin, bishops like Mgr Maurin of Grenoble, and all his predecessors down to Mgr Ginoulhiac, of such learned memory: all are included in the hurtful reproaches, which the commentator dares to attribute in the first place to the Most Blessed Virgin Herself!

    "And all this is written and published, offered and distributed for those who would like to find in these pages food for their curiosity. Would they learn charity and love by learning to despise the legitimate authority of the priesthood? For, the remarkable thing is that this Christian, this Catholic, seems to savour a sort of enjoyment in scourging the leaders of holy Church, those whom he mocks in calling them 'our princes'

    "You will not, therefore be surprised, Monseigneur, if I condemn these two pamphlets by Dr Mariavi, if I rebuke their spirit and their character, and if I advise the faithful not to read them.

    "With my affectionate respect,

    A., cardinal de Cabrihres

    Bishop of Montpellier.

    (Le Hidec, Les secrets de La Salette, p. 164-167)

    This definitive judgement was corroborated a few months later by Rome through the publication of a decree which forbade Catholics to deal with the question.""


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    What does the Catholic Encyclopedia say on the matter?

    The Catholic Encyclopedia, of course, is excellent as far as it goes. And, in this case, it goes as far as 1910; see the copyright on the bottom?

    In any event, it is helpful to actually read the data to get the full picture together with additional information. Consider this section:
    (From here on, my comments will be within ****** and ****** )
     
     

    "...These two secrets, which neither Melanie or Maximin ever made known to each other, were sent by them in 1851 to Pius IX on the advice of Mgr. de Bruillard. It is unknown what impressions these mysterious revelations made on the pope, for on this point there were two versions diametrically opposed to each other. Maximin's secret is not known, for it was never published. Melanie's was inserted in its entirety in brochure which she herself had printed in 1879 at Lecce, Italy, with the approval of the bishop of that town. A lively controversy followed as to whether the secret published in 1879 was identical with that communicated to Pius IX in 1851, or in its second form it was not merely a work of the imagination. The latter was the opinion of wise and prudent persons, who were persuaded that a distinction must be made between the two Melanie's, between the innocent and simple voyante of 1846 and the visionary of 1879, whose mind had been disturbed by reading apocalyptic books and the lives of illuminati....

    The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume IX
    Copyright (c) 1910"

    ****** Thus, Melanie produced "two versions diametrically opposed to each other..." The first, around 1851, from the "simple voyant"; the second 1879, from the "visionary...whose mind had been disturbed..."

    Let's go a bit further: ******

    ...As early as November 1847, her directress feared "that the celebrity that had been thrust upon her might make her conceited." Surrounded with concern and consideration on the part of visitors when she became a postulant, then a novice in the same Congregation, she held fast to her own opinions. For this reason, the new Bishop of Grenoble, while recognizing her piety and devotion, would refuse to admit her to vows "in order to train her... in the practice of Christian humility and simplicity". Unfortunately, Melanie then took to lending a willing ear to "troubled and sick individuals," to people whose minds were obsessed with popular prophecies, pseudo-apocalyptic and pseudo-mystical theories. This would affect her for the rest of her life. To give credence to her pronouncements she linked them to the secret she had received from the Beautiful Lady. Even a cursory review points to immutable differences between what Melanie says and writes, and the words and signs Mary gave at La Salette. Melanie's problems and phantasms became the epicenter of her discourse. Through her prophecies she reaps revenge on those who oppose her projects. She thus expresses her rejection of a society and a hostile environment. She recreates an imaginary past where the frustrations of her childhood are effectively exorcised. As early as 1854, Bishop Ginoulhiac wrote: "the predictions attributed to Melanie... have no basis in fact: they have no importance with regard to La Salette... they have come after La Salette and have nothing to do with it". The bishop added: "The children were given the broadest freedom to amend or deny any statement they may have made, but they have never altered anything on the veracity of the event of La Salette". With this in mind, Bishop Ginoulhiac, on September 19, 1855, proclaimed the following from the Holy Mountain itself: "The mission of the shepherds is herewith ended, that of the Church begins." Unfortunately, Melanie pursued her prophetic meanderings. Later, these were orchestrated by the blazing talent of a Leon Bloy and would become a "Melanist" movement allegedly stemming from La Salette, but lacking any foundation except the unverifiable pronouncements of Melanie. All this is far distant from the historical foundations of the Apparition. The content of these so-called prophecies, despite their religious veneer, have nothing to do with religious truth as taught by the Church, and recalled by Mary at La Salette. The subject matter is no longer faith but the unstable, questionable and sterile domain of personal assumptions. This type of writing alienates faith instead of strengthening it. In 1854, a English priest brought Melanie to England. She entered the Carmelite convent of Darlington the following year: she took temporary vows there in 1856, but left the convent in 1860. She tried religious life again with the Sisters of Compassion of Marseille. After a stay in their convent of Cephalonia (Greece), and a short sojourn at the Carmelite convent of Marseille, she returned to the Compassion for a brief time. Following a short stay at Corps and La Salette, she went to live at Castellamare di Stabia, near Naples in Italy. She resided there seventeen years, writing her "secrets" as well as a rule for a future foundation. The Vatican urged the local bishop to forbid her this type of publication, but she persisted in her search for approbation and an imprimatur, even extracting a hearing from a papal official, Bishop Lepidi. This, however, never constituted even a veiled approval. The authority invoked by Mélanie is incompetent in the matter. After a stay at Cannes in the south of France, Mélanie travelled to Chalon-sur-Saône, seeking to found a community with the sponsorship of the Canon de Brandt of Amiens. Eventually she entered into litigation with Bishop Perraud, the ordinary of Autum. The Holy See, brought into the matter, decided in favor of the bishop. In 1892, Mélanie returned to a place near Lecce, Italy, then journeyed to Messina in Sicily on the invitation of Canon Annibale di Francia. Following a few months in the Piedmont region, she was invited by the abbé Combe, pastor of Diou, a priest much taken up with politico-religious prophecies, to settle in the Allier region. She finished a contrived autobiography, wherein she created an extraordinary childhood enriched with pseudo-mystical wanderings, her own imaginings and the chimera provided by her correspondents. The message Mélanie attempts to link to La Salette during this period has nothing whatever in common with the testimony she gave about the Apparition in the early years.

    Our Lady of La Salette - Story
    http://www.nsrasalette.org.br/ingles.htm

    ****** I have pointed out previously that the so-called secret of La Salette (the 1879 version) contains the allegation that Our Lady stated that "Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of anti-Christ."

    I have produced evidence that this claim is, simply, a canard. Benedictine Bro. Thomas Marie Sennot's critique of the pseuso Benedictine Bro. Michael Dimond on Steve Hand's TCR News (http://www.tcrnews.com/ ) shows "Bro. Dimond" agenda as typical of schismatic and dissident Catholics, who jump on the "Rome will lose the Faith..." slogan in order to help justify their disobedience to the Pope and the Magisterium.

    Also from the CRC:******

    ACCOUNT OF THE APPARITION OF OUR LADY OF LA SALETTE
    "...All sensational publications, therefore, produced to feed public curiosity with the supposed Secrets of La Salette and their fanciful interpretations, must be regarded as suspect. This rash diffusion of literature was condemned by the Holy Office in 1880. All pamphlets or reviews, books or memoirs, emanating from these obstinate visionaries, were successively banned by the competent authorities..."
    http://www.crc-internet.org/salette2.htm

    ****** This rash diffusion of literature was condemned by the Holy Office in 1880. ******
     
     
    ****** Here is a small portion from a Blue Army source: ******
     

    Message from the Mountain, by John Hauf
    ...Melanie Calvat made many attempts at the religious life, but had become opinionated by her celebrity status and associated with people obsessed with popular prophecies, pseudo-apocalyptic and pseudo-mystical phenomena. She issued prophecies and linked them to the secret given to her by Our Lady. This became such a problem that in 1854, Bishop Ginoulhiac of Grenoble wrote, "the predictions attributed to Melanie . . . have no basis in fact; they have no importance with regard to La Salette . . . they have come after La Salette and have nothing to do with it." On September l9, 1855, on the mountain at La Salette, the bishop proclaimed, "The mission of the shepherds is here- with ended, that of the Church begins.'

    Melanie died on December 14, 1904, at Altamura, near Bari, Italy. She is buried beneath a marble column with a bas-relief depiction of Our Lady welcoming her into heaven. In spite of her unapproved writings, Melanie was always faithful to her original account of the apparition and message of La Salette. She demonstrated this at the Shrine of La Salette during her last visit there September 8-19,1902.

    The following article was excerpted from materials composed by Fr. Roger Castel, M.S. and provided by the Missionaries of La Salette...
    "... obsessed ... pseudo-apocalyptic and pseudo-mystical phenomena ... ... issued prophecies ... such a problem ... Bishop ... wrote, "the predictions attributed to Melanie . . . have no basis in fact; they have no importance with regard to La Salette . . . they have come after La Salette and have nothing to do with it."
    Did anything happen AFTER the 1910 Catholic Encyclopedia entry on La Salette?
    Here we see from
    http://mypage.bluewin.ch/cafarus/falseapparitions.html

    "...- 1846 La Salette, France, recognized in 1851 but condemned by the Holy Office Decr. 9 1923 and included in the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (Pius XI)..."
    The Catholic Encyclopedia article predates the above condemnation - not of the apparition of Our Lady, but of the false messages promoted by the bitter Melanie and by dissident and disobedient persons with their own agenda.
    Anyway, "Bluewin" source provided the link to the Librorum Prohibitorum (Pius XI) at
    http://www.univ.com.br/acmm/Diversos/Informacoes/filosofia/espiritismo_e_religiao/
    Index_Librorum_Prohibitorum/A_Z/sss.htm

    Where we see:

    "Salette (La). L'apparition de la Très Sainte Vierge. Decr. 9 maii 1923."
    It is interesting, is it not, that an alleged "seer"/"visionary", or the obsessed should repeat Melanie Calvat's fabrication? It only goes to show that while there CAN be a genuine event, there is no guarantee that the "visionary" or the obsessed will always be "kosher" on the matter.
    Apparitions, locutions, miraculous healings, strange photos, visions, we hear of these alleged phenomena happening all over the world. The Catholic Church considers very few of such claims as "worthy of belief."

    That is why the diocesan bishop possesses the charism of discernment for his diocese on such matters. Can a bishop make a mistake? Yes. But if you obey him, you are not sinning. But if you disobey him, you are - even though he makes a mistake. Remember the 4th Commandment? It still applies to our Spiritual Fathers!

    John Loughnan
    Sean Ó Lachtnáin's Home Page
    http://members.tripod.co.uk/jloughnan/index.htm
    January 27, 2002
     
     



    IS Solange HERTZ THE "FRENCH AUTHOR"?
    I have received correspondence, from a person who I will refer to as "xx.xxxxxx", Dialogue With An Academic Ecclesiastic On The Alleged Statement by The Virgin Mary that "Rome Will Lose The Faith And Become The Seat Of Antichrist" which needs to be addressed:
     

    xx.xxxxxx enquired whether I was aware of an Integrist publication of a refutation of my position on the alleged words of Our Lady that "Rome Will Lose The Faith...". The article was said to be by an unnamed "french author".
    He believes the "Rome will lose the Faith..." allegation.
    But he does not believe that Our Lady "would use the vulgar metaphor for the Vatican".
    He does not believe that the expression means that "Rome as the seat of the Antichrist is the Catholic Church.
    He says that "Rome being the seat of Antichrist, is already the teaching of St John in the Apocalyse." When challenged to substantiate that claim, he became quite hostile, even arrogant, but would not provide substantiation.
    He recommended that I refer my position to my "confessor". This I did, providing him with all the correspondence and files on the subject. To-day, Feb. 13th, Ash Wednesday, my Parish Priest (and "confessor"), Father Roger Ryan, gave me the spiritual advice to "continue what you are doing."
    His response to my request of him to forward the "french author"'s article on Melanie went unanswered.
    He asked me: are you "being uncharitable, or have you set out on a self-imposed witch-hunt for 'Integrists', and caught me in your sights unjustly?" Well, I have not identified him except as xx.xxxxxx!
    His response to my request for assistance in the translation of the Acts of The Apostolic See Decretums and Declaration on "La Salette" was ingnored. Read the Latin Texts and English translations here.
    But here is the most interesting part:
    Subsequent to xx.xxxxxx's claims about a "french author", I introduced into the dialogue a certain Solange Hertz:

    "There are many who cast doubt on the lawfulness of docuмents signed by "only" a Notary. Such doubt was actualized by Solange Hertz in the Appendix to her book - the appendix only being on the internet at http://homepages.msn.com/ReportersAlley/romcath2/melanie.html"
    I sought to establish just who was the "french author" to whom xx.xxxxxx referred.
    Instead of doing so, xx.xxxxxx defended Mrs Hertz with:

    "Mrs. Hertz's thesis seems to me more probable, since she cites a source with an imprimatur not included in any of the decrees you sent. And she certainly does not discount the authority of the curia, only that the decrees refer to the original authentic text."
    Well, some or all of that may be, but not all of it is verifiable in the ONLY material that I have been able to discover on the net - and, xx.xxxxxx was not forthcoming with any URLs to back-up his statement. In any event, the opinion that I have received from a Canon Lawyer regarding the legality of the 1923 docuмent is:
    "It seems pretty obvious the prohibition would apply, since the context is clear."
    Not only that but xx.xxxxxx tries to bolstered his case for the reliability of Solange Hertz' opinions, with:
    "As to the facts, she quotes a book on the question by a member of the Congregation of the Index; I'd read that book before publishing docuмents on the Web that would call her or Melanie a liar, if I had a conscience.
    "Yes, tomorrow is Ash Wednesday; and this letter of mine is a rebuke in the Lord."

    Which words of exhortation were prefaced by:
    "Here's the core of the problem:  when judging the argument of an author it is normal practice, in both academic and eccelsiastical circles to presume the truthfulness of the writer and to critique his reasoning out of the facts he presents as to the value of his conclusion(s); if you discount the facts presented by an author, a priori, simply because you presmue the author is not trustworthy, while having no evidence to adduce this, then you are not pursuing truth, but rather disagreement. And I see no reason to share such a quest, which is contrary to evangelical charity."
    Here are some further Solange Hertzisms"
    "At this juncture, when so much of what our Lady prophesied in the Secret is beginning to materialize, the enemy of mankind can be expected to utilize every means of discrediting a prophecy intended to lay open his machinations before the eyes of the faithful. Whereas the arguments which proved so effective in casting doubt on the Secret's authenticity when it was first divulged are being refurbished with a vengeance, the hard facts which demolished them then have only been reinforced by subsequent events. Most of them can be found as good as new in a 40-page brochure in defense of the Secret which was published in French in 1922, bearing the Imprimatur, dated June 6 of that year, of no less an authority than the Dominican Fr. Albert Lepidi, then Master of the Sacred Palace and Permanent Consultor to the Congregation of the Index.
    Disseminated by the St. Augustine Society under the title "The Apparition of the Most Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette," it bears a facsimile of the Imprimatur with Fr. Lepidi's signature, plus the following words in his own hand: "These pages have been written solely in the interests of truth." The first half of the brochure contains Melanie's own account of the apparition, together with the full text of the Secret, which she set in writing in Castellamare, Italy on the feast of our Lady's Presentation, November 21, 1878 and which received an Imprimatur the following year from the local Ordinary, Bishop Zola. The second half is devoted to contemporary testimonials in defense of the Secret, the whole closing with an ecclesiastically approved Prayer to the Most Blessed Trinity for the canonization of Melanie Calvat.

    Seven letters from Bishop Zola to various dignitaries figure among the contents. Privileged to authorize the first publication of the Secret in its entirety with his Imprimatur, he never wavered in his convictions concerning La Salette, nor in his veneration for its messenger. Not only have his letters lost nothing of their force with passing time, but hindsight considerably sharpens their focus. A sampling of the longest and most informative one are offered here in translation. The Bishop wrote it May 24, 1880 in reply to questions addressed to him by Fr. Isidore Roubaud, one of the few French priests who dared undertake Melanie's defense in the face of the dogged opposition mounted by Masonically influenced bishops like Mgr. Ginoulhiac of Grenoble, successor to the saintly Mgr. Bruillard, in whose diocese the apparition had taken place and had been originally approved.
    About La Salette, by Solange Strong Hertz

    Wow!!! Without producing any evidence for her claim (at least in this section of her "thesis"), the nasty Bishop who displeases the Melanieites is branded "Masonically influenced"! Of course, there may be evidence, but at this distance, and without ready access to that evidence, I find this to be an extraordinary claim. xx.xxxxxx does not find any problem, but does not endeavour to help my scepticism.
    In fact, he urges me to read the "book on the question by a member of the Congregation of the Index..." I am urged, nay, almost commanded to "read that book before publishing docuмents on the Web that would call her or Melanie a liar, if I had a conscience."So, what of that book?

    Just remember that it is described by Solange Hertz as a

    "40-page brochure in defense of the Secret which was published in French in 1922, bearing the Imprimatur, dated June 6 of that year, of no less an authority than the Dominican Fr. Albert Lepidi, then Master of the Sacred Palace and Permanent Consultor to the Congregation of the Index.
    Disseminated by the St. Augustine Society under the title 'The Apparition of the Most Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette' "

    It so happens that the last "Index Librorum Prohibitorum" was published in 1948. A copy is on-line here A search of the 1948 Index produces five La Salette related entries:
      INDEX LIBRORVM PROHIBITORVM -- 1948  Apparition (L') de la Très Sainte Vierge de la Salette. 1923  
    Combe, Gilbert-Joseph-Emile Le grand coup avec sa date probable, c'est-à-dire le grand châtiment du monde et le triomphe universel de l'Eglise; étude sur le secret de la Salette, augmentée de la brochure de Mélanie et autres pièces justificatives. 1901  
    Combe, Gilbert-Joseph-Emile Le secret de Mélanie, bergère de la Salette, et la crise actuelle. 1907  
    Mariavé, Henri La leçon de l'hôpital Notre-Dame, d'Ypres; exégèse du secret de la Salette. 1916  
    Salette (La) L'apparition de la Très Sainte Vierge. 1923  

    The first thing to note is that the first and fifth condemned items refer SPECIFICALLY and respectively to "The Apparition of the Holy Virgin at La Sallette", and "The Apparition of the Holy Virgin"! It would appear, then, that it is the "Apparition" itself which, at this time, was condemned. However, I have not yet been able to find substantiating evidence to establish this as conclusive, and will have to simply state that "it appears from the entries in the Index that the Apparition was condemned."

    However, although no author is stipulated, I am prepared to concede that, rather than the "Apparition" itself, the prohibition refers to the "Opusculum" (the "little work") shown below in the extract from the Decretal of 10 May 1923. Please refer to the actual Decree.

    It is appropriate to point out here that the above Gilbert Joseph Emile Combe, whose works on La Salette were placed on the Index of Forbidden Books in 1901 and 1907, is none other that the person mentioned in the major multilingual Brazilian website on La Salette, Apparition de la Trés Sainte Vierge sur la ainte Montagne de la Salette. This French site does not dignify the 1879 Melanie fabrication of "Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of antichrist. For those not proficient in French, the Diocese of San Bernadino, California also has the translation on the Melanie section here.. Here is the section relevant to abbé Combe - and Fr. Lepidi, O.P.:

    "Following a short stay at Corps and La Salette, she went to live at Castellamare di Stabia, near Naples in Italy. She resided there seventeen years, writing her "secrets" as well as a rule for a future foundation. The Vatican urged the local bishop to forbid her this type of publication, but she persisted in their search for approbation and an imprimatur, even extracting a hearing from a papal official, Bishop Lepidi. This, however, never constituted even a veiled approval. The authority invoked by Mélanie is incompetent in the matter. After a stay at Cannes in the south of France, Mélanie traveled to Chalon-sur-Saône, seeking to found a community with the sponsorship of the Canon de Brandt of Amiens. Eventually she entered into litigation with Bishop Perraud, the ordinary of Autum. The Holy See, brought into the matter, decided in favor of the bishop. In 1892, Mélanie returned to a place near Lecce, Italy, then journeyed to Messina in Sicily on the invitation of Canon Annibale di Francia. Following a few months in the Piedmont region, she was invited by the abbé Combe, pastor of Diou, a priest much taken up with politico-religious prophecies, to settle in the Allier region. She finished a contrived autobiography, wherein she created an extraordinary childhood enriched with pseudo-mystical wanderings, her own imaginings and the chimera provided by her correspondents. The message Mélanie attempts to link to La Salette during this period has nothing whatever in common with the testimony she gave about the Apparition in the early years.
    Now, let us return to one of the entries in the ACTS OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE, - the last one Dated at Rome, May, 10, 1923:
      DECRETAL  DAMNATUR OPUSCULUM: "L'APPARITION DE LA TRÉS SAINTE VIERGE DE LA SALETTE" "L'apparition de la trés Sainte Vierge sur la montague de la Salette le samedi septembre 1846. - Simple réimpression du texte intégral publié par Mélanie, etc. Societé Saint - Augustin, Paris-Rome-Bruges, 1922" 10 May 1923  

    Now! If that is not the very same "The Apparition of the Most Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette" which is claimed to have been given an Imprimatur by "the Dominican Fr. Albert Lepidi, then Master of the Sacred Palace and Permanent Consultor to the Congregation of the Index", and "Disseminated by the St. Augustine Society under the title 'The Apparition of the Most Blessed Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette' " - then I will "go 'he" for hidey"!!!

    In other words, it appears very strongly, that xx.xxxxxx is urging me to read and accept a book, which may or may not have been given the said Imprimatur by Fr. (later, Bishop) Lepidi in 1922 - which book was placed on the Index of Forbidden Books about one year later. And, this is the publication which supposedly disposes of all of the qualms of those who have doubts as to the believability of Melanié Calvat's 1878 version of the 1846 apparitions! Unbelievable!!!

    Solange Hertz then proceeded to cast doubts on the "regularity" of the 1915 Decree:

    "After Melanie's death in 1904 the enemies of La Salette hoped to deal the final blow to the Secret. Putting the capstone on the falsehoods and misrepresentations already in circulation, a decree was promulgated on December 21, 1915 which ordered "the faithful of all countries to abstain from treating or discussing this said question under whatsoever pretext or form, either in books, pamphlets or articles signed or anonymous, or in any other way." Although the action is duly recorded in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis for December 31 of that year, certain irregularities were soon noted in its regard.
    To begin with, it carries signatures of no Cardinals or members of the Sacred Congregation, but only that of its notary, Luigi Castellano. There is moreover no mention of the date on which the Holy Office presumably met to vote this piece of legislation, nor any reference to its ever having been submitted to Pope Benedict XV for final approval. Although the decree forbids all discussion of the Secret and specifies penalties to be imposed on transgressors, no censure whatever is attached to the work itself, as would be expected in the circuмstances.There is not even a prohibition against possessing, reading or distributing it!

    In other words the alleged 'decree' which has been brandished like a club over the heads of the faithful for over eighty years to prevent their hearing a message addressed 'to all our Lady's people,' has apparently never enjoyed the force of law.

    Not only that, but she believes that there is a case for believing the May 10, 1923 decree is invalid:
    Reaction on the part of the Holy Office was swift. On May 10, 1923 a decree was issued "proscribing and condemning" the entire brochure, designated by the title "The Apparition of the Most Holy Virgin on the Mountain of La Salette on Saturday, September 19, 1845." That the apparition took place in 1846 and not in 1845 would alone serve to invalidate the decree, besides the fact that for over 43 years Melanie's account of the happening had incurred no condemnation whatsoever from any authorized quarter. To make matters worse, the Holy Office took its fateful action in a session held on the previous day, when Fr. Lepidi was ill and unable to make an appearance, either to defend the Imprimatur he had accorded the original publication or to repudiate the unauthorized letter which had been attached to it.
    So saith the true "Integrist"!
    First of all, the pages of the Acts of The Apostolic See are FULL of Decrees signed solely by a Notary. (See following examples.)
    Decree prohibiting the work of M. Mir and I de Recalde; 4 May 1923. Aloisius Castellano, Notary.
    Decree excommunicating the priest Michael Collin, alias Gregory XVII; 30 May, 1951. Marinus Marani, Notary.

    Decree excommunicating Fr. Leonard Feeney; 13 Feb. 1953. Marius Crovini, Notary.

    Warning prohibiting publication of "promises" attributed to the 15 Prayers of St Briget; 28 Jan. 1954. Marius Crovini, Notary.
     

    Secondly, (at least in the docuмent on line), she names the Notary who signed the 1915 Decree as "Luigi Castellano." The fact is that the correct name of that Notary (as is frequently demonstrated in the AAS pages) is Aloisius Castellano.!
    Thus my question to xx.xxxxxx:
    "If it is the reference to which you referred, I would ask you what degree of trust do you place in Solange Hertz' accuracy in detail? Is she to be trusted in all that she reports and writes about?
    Sadly, xx.xxxxxx took offence, and replied:
    "...when judging the argument of an author it is normal practice, in both academic and eccelsiastical circles to presume the truthfulness of the writer and to critique his reasoning out of the facts he presents as to the value of his conclusion(s); if you discount the facts presented by an author, a priori, simply because you presmue the author is not trustworthy, while having no evidence to adduce this, then you are not pursuing truth, but rather disagreement. And I see no reason to share such a quest, which is contrary to evangelical charity.
    Finally, Fr. William Most wrote:
    "The Secret of Melanie of La Salette has harsh accusations on clergy and religious in the period 1840 to 1865 - historically untrue."

    And in relation to Solange Hertz' exhortation to the Catholic world to "go on, the Index was abolished in 1966, now you can read anything that was on the Index:

    Regarding the circulation of texts of alleged private revelations, the Congregation states:
     

    The Interpretation given by some individuals to a Decision approved by Paul VI on 14 October 1966 and promulgated on 15 November of that year, in virtue of which writings and messages resulting from alleged revelations could be freely circulated in the Church, is absolutely groundless. This decision actually referred to the "abolition of the Index of Forbidden Books" and determined that --- after the relevant censures were lifted --- the moral obligation still remained of not circulating or reading those writings which endanger faith and morals.
    In should be recalled however that with regard to the circulation of texts of alleged private revelations, Canon 623 #1 of the current Code remains in force: "the Pastors of the Church have the … right to demand that writings to be published by the Christian faithful which touch upon faith or morals be submitted to their judgement".

    Alleged supernatural revelations and writings concerning them are submitted in first instance to the judgement of the diocesan Bishop, and, in particular cases, to the judgement of the Episcopal Conference and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
     

    Despite this, my "academic ecclesiastic" correspondent urged me to read this "opusculum" ("little work") which was officially placed on the Index of Forbidden Books.
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.


    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #1 on: September 21, 2010, 05:16:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  •  Pope Pius IX approved La Sallette. (and 2 other apparitions)

    "Rome has spoken, the case is closed."  St. Augustine.

    Isn't that the way CINOCS think ?

    ========================================

      What foolishness to worry about  A N Y apparition when the worship of false gods at the 1986 Assisi Paganfest has yet to be repudiated by the popes of Rome.

    Ephesians 1:10 says to "re-establish all things in Christ".

    =======================================
    Quote

    "Questionable Premise:

    "ROME WILL LOSE THE FAITH AND BECOME THE SEAT OF ANTICHRIST"
    -- Martin Luther: 1540 AD. / Condemned LaSallette Message: 1879"

        This is reactionary thinking. Just because Luther says something, the opposite has to be true. Christ said there will be many antiChrists and he even said to Peter "Get behind me Satan". I personally think Pius IX acted like an antiChrist. Of course nobody around here would ever admit that when Peter was called Satan, Peter thought he was doing a noble and charitable deed. Sound like Pius IX?

      The road to hell is paved with the best of intentions. I think we should end the confusion and toss out every apparition, and focus on the words of Christ.


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #2 on: September 21, 2010, 07:24:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Classicom, you are not really liked too much here and your attacks on the Mother of God are really grating...you have a hard on against Pius IX and find anyway, whatsover to trash him and the Church, a part of which you are not....

    Do me a favor, and wander off, for your attacks are not welcomed on Mary.....you are, sir a  :heretic:
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +189/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #3 on: September 21, 2010, 11:41:10 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline Emerentiana

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1420
    • Reputation: +1194/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #4 on: September 21, 2010, 11:59:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is an article on La Salette. " Rome will loose the faith and become the seat of  Antichrist" phrase in the Secret was approved by the popes.

    La Salette: 19 September 1846 - 2004
     

     
     

    But when the Secret was suppressed by John XXIII, the disappointment of the faithful was enormous.  Soon thereafter, suspicions that something had gone awry in the Vatican first began to be expressed in Catholic circles, and religious editorials.

    The Secret of La Salette

    In its day, the Secret of La Salette had also captured the attention of the faithful, as well as Church leaders.  This included two popes, who recognized in the words conveyed by the Virgin to two French peasant children, Melanie Calvat and Maximim Giraud, an authentic harbinger of the end times.  But this earlier Secret also was effectively stifled.

    There has always been a definite link between the suppression of the Secret of La Salette by the French hierarchy (followed by, the Holy Office), and the quashing of the Third Secret of Fatima by John XXIII in 1960.  For, their respective messages, which had the same source, were undoubtedly similar, and thus were met with stiff resistance from the same quarters.

    Approved by Popes Pius IX and Leo XIII, yet virtually concealed for 70 years, the Secret of La Salette read in part:

    “ . . . The Vicar of my Son will have much to suffer, as, for a time the Church will be the victim of great persecutions: this will be the hour of darkness.  The Church will suffer a terrible crisis . . .

    “The Holy Father will suffer greatly.  I will be by his side to the end in order to receive his sacrifice.  The wicked will make several attempts on his life but they cannot harm him.  But neither he nor his successor [here, Melanie inserted in parentheses the words, ‘who will not reign long’] will live to see the triumph of the Church of God . . . Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist . . .The Church will be in eclipse, the world will be in dismay.”  

    The La Salette devotion and particularly, the Secret of La Salette, stirred up so much hostility against the seers, Melanie and Maximim, that, to this day, the reputations of those devout souls are still called into question.  Fierce hostility to the Secret soon developed within a certain coterie of the clergy, possibly where Masonic infiltration had been most effective.  Melanie and Maximim became the targets of vicious attacks, particularly among members of the French hierarchy.  Ironically, the French bishops, who had most violently opposed the young seers and the La Salette devotion, were stopped “dead” in their tracks, according to the following account of that time:

     “In 1846, in a municipality of the Isère (La Salette), the Virgin appeared to two little children: Maximim Giraud and Melanie Calvat-Mathieu.

    “Four French Bishops devoted themselves to the work of suffocating the belief [in La Salette] among the population.  But they all died in tragic and mysterious circuмstances.  Bishop Ginovuhac of Grenoble, who had confined the young Melanie in an English convent in order to silence her, died shortly afterwards in a madhouse.  His successor, Bishop Fava, who also did everything possible in order to halt the dissemination of the [La Salette] devotion, was found dead, stretched out on the floor, stripped, with disfigured eyes, and clenched fists.  Bishop Gilbert of Amieins (and later, Bourdeaux), who had said: ‘The secret of La Salette is nothing more than a tissue of profaneness, lies, and exaggeration,’ shortly after 16 August 1889, was found dead in his room, also having fallen to the floor.  And, during his funeral, his coffin crashed from the catafalque.  Archbishop Darboy of Paris, who personally interrogated Maximim, causing him great psychological disturbance in order to learn the secret of the Virgin, and being perturbed by not obtaining it, had said to the boy: ‘The words of your beautiful Lady contain stupidity, as stupid as will be your secret.’  This brought the response from the boy: ‘It is as true, that I have seen the beautiful Lady, as I am certain that before three years are out, you will have been shot.”  The time for the revolutionary movement of the Communes had not yet come, nor had it been foreseen by the complacent and careless France of the Second Empire.  But, on 24 May 1871, this prediction also came true: the Archbishop was shot by the Communards of Paris.”  

    Many years later, Melanie would have the Secret of La Salette printed (at her own expense) in its entirety, but had to venture to the heel of the Italian peninsula to find a bishop who would approve of her project.  Monsignore Salvator Grafen Zola, the Bishop of Lece, Italy, granted Melanie an imprimatur for the first publication of the entire contents of the Secret.  But most of the copies that Melanie would distribute throughout France, were later confiscated by confessors who, under orders of the French Church, demanded the surrender of the booklets from their penitents, as a condition for absolution.   Eventually, the French hierarchy threatened Rome with the cut off of “Peter’s Pence” (material support for the urgent needs of the Pope) unless the Vatican would agree to curtail the circulation of the Secret, officially, even though its dissemination had been favored by Popes Pius IX and Leo XIII.

    From 1879 to 1900, several books foretelling the reign of Antichrist, perhaps inspired by the Secret of La Salette, had been published by highly respected clergy and laymen in the Church.  This included Bishop Salvator Grafen Zola, Henry Edward Cardinal Manning (the eminent English Cardinal who drafted the decree on papal infallibility for Pope Pius IX at the First Vatican Council), and Frederick William Helle.  By 1910, the references to a long-suffering Pope, Rome becoming the seat of Antichrist, the true Church being eclipsed and other clues concerning the end-times attack against the papacy, formed a common thread between the classical interpretations of scripture prophecy and the most recent warnings from Heaven.  These kinds of details, found in the genuine, modern-day, Marian prophecies, would always generate the greatest opposition from the Church’s enemies who had infiltrated her structures.  For they threatened to expose the satanic plot and long-time goal of the Masonic Lodge’s agents in the Vatican, to usurp and control the papal chair.

    The antagonism of the Masonic-dominated French clergy by which the French seers had been buffeted, and even shunned by some officials in Rome, was obviously generated by the Secret itself.  For the Secret came very close to divulging the Lodge’s occult plan to overthrow the papacy, to suppress the Mass, and to destroy the Church (“Tolle Pappam; Tolle Misam; Tolle Ecclesiam .”).

    The Secret warned that “the Church will be in eclipse.”  “Eclipse” means hidden; covered up; seeming to disappear.  The Holy Scriptures say: “Where there is Peter, there is the Church.”  That the obscuration of the Pope was the prerequisite step for taking away the Mass and the Church seems to have been foretold by Melanie.  She understood that Peter would be hidden along with the Church, and that his “eclipse” would be a prelude to the disappearance of the Mass.  For, in commenting on this part of the secret, Melanie said to the French Abbot Paul Combe:

    “The Church will be eclipsed.  At first, we will not know which is the true pope.  Then secondly, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass will cease to be offered in churches and houses; it will be such that, for a time, there will not be public services any more.  But I see that the Holy Sacrifice has not really ceased: it will be offered in barns, in alcoves, in caves, and underground.”  

    It should be remembered that despite the strong measures taken against Masonry by Pope Leo XIII, Cardinal Rampolla, a secret, 33rd degree Freemason, had risen through ranks of the hierarchy and eventually became Pope Leo’s Secretary of State, having thus attained the second highest office in the Church.  From key posts, which they had already occupied 100 years before the conclave that produced the Masonic antipope, John XXIII, Luciferian agents, employed as high Vatican officials were in position to smother these heavenly warnings, by discouraging several true popes from acting upon them.  

    On December 21, 1915, the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, issued a ban against further publication of “commentaries” on the Secret of La Salette, by the following decree:

    “It has come to the knowledge of this Supreme Congregation that there are still persons, even ecclesiastics, who, in spite of the answers and decisions of the Sacred Congregation itself, continue, by books, pamphlets, and articles published in periodicals, whether signed or anonymous, to discuss the question of the Secrets of La Salette, its various texts, its adaptations to our present times or to the future - and these, not only without the approbation of their Bishops, but even in spite of their express prohibition. In order that these abuses, which are hurtful to true piety, and seriously attack ecclesiastical authority, may be repressed, the same Sacred Congregation orders the faithful of all countries to abstain from treating and discussing this said question, under whatsoever pretext or form, either in books, pamphlets, or articles signed or and anonymous, or in any other way . . .

    “ . . . This Decree is not, however, contrary to the devotion to the Blessed Virgin invoked and known under the title of Reconciler of La Salette.

    “Given at Rome, at the palace of the Holy Office, December 21, l915.”  Signed - Louis Castellano, Notary.  

    Although the Secret itself was not censured in 1915, but only private interpretations of it, the same effect was nevertheless achieved by the enemies of La Salette, as Catholic publishers were thereafter very reluctant to reproduce the Secret, even without commentaries.  Hence, its contents (along with numerous, related essays on the coming of Antichrist) remained hidden for decades.

    The Message of Fatima

    Just as the Secret of La Salette had been consigned to oblivion, another warning from Heaven was being quashed by unseen forces inside the Vatican.    From 1917 to 1945, one of the most important events in modern history was largely concealed from the faithful—the appearance of Our Lady of Fatima.

    Supernatural manifestations at Fatima began in 1916, the year after the Vatican monitum had stifled all discussion on the Secret of La Salette.  In that year, St. Michael the Archangel had begun to appear to the three Fatima children, Jacinta Marto, Francisco Marto, and Lucia dos Santos.  Then, on 13 May 1917, the first vision of the Virgin Mary occurred to the young shepherds.  On 13 October 1917, the last vision of Our Lady of Fatima, to appear to all three Portuguese seers, occurred while the spectacular “Miracle of the Sun” was simultaneously seen by 70-80,000 dumfounded eyewitnesses.  But it was earlier, on 13 July 1917, when the young visionaries were shown the terrifying image of Hell, that the Great Fatima Secret was delivered to them by the Mother of God.  The “Fatima Secret” stated in part:

    “You have seen Hell where the souls of poor sinners go.  To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to My Immaculate Heart.  If what I ask of you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace.  The war is going to end, but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the reign of Pius XI.  When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that He is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father.

    “To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to My Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of Reparation on the First Saturdays.  If My requests are heeded, Russia will be converted and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.  The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated.

    “In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph.  The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to Me, and she will be converted, and a certain period of peace will be granted to the world . . .”  

    - From: The Plot Against The Pope; Coup dé’tat at the Conclave - 1958, by Gary Giuffré -


    Our Lady of La Salette – Pray for us!


    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +189/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #5 on: September 21, 2010, 03:03:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think the best that can be said about Gary Giuffre is that he is an arch kook.  Here's his website.

    http://theplotagainstthepope.blogspot.com/
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline Emerentiana

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1420
    • Reputation: +1194/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #6 on: September 21, 2010, 04:24:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Here is the Apprition of Our Lady from another source:




    The Message of Our lady of La Salette
    "Our Lady's Apocalypse"
    Delivered by Our Lady to
    MELANIE CALVAT and MAXIMIN GIRAUD
    The message was approved by the Catholic Church and was published in its entirety at Lecce. France, on November 15, 1979 with the imprimatur of Bishop Zola.
    Published by the Shepherdess of La Salette with Imprimatur by Mgr. Bishop of Lecce.
    "Well my children you will pass this on to all of my people."
    Simple reproduction without commentary or controversy of the original edition of Lecce in 1879.
    APPARITION of the BLESSED VIRGIN on the Mountain of
    LA SALETTE the 19th of September, 1846
    The following Secret was given by Our Lady to two children, Mélanie Calvat and Maximin Giraud, on September 19, 1846, while they were tending cattle on the mountain of La Salette, France.
    "On the 18th of September (1846), the eve of the Holy Apparition of the Holy Virgin, I was alone, as usual, watching over my Master’s cows. Around eleven o’clock in the morning, I saw a small boy walking towards me. I was frightened at this, for it seemed to me that everyone ought to know that I avoided all kinds of company. This boy came up to me and said:
    "Little girl, I’m coming with you, I’m from Corps too". At these words, the natural evil in me soon showed itself, and taking a few steps back, I told him: "I don’t want anybody around. I want to be alone." But the boy followed me, saying: "Go on, let me stay with you. My Master told me to come and watch over my cows together with yours. I’m from Corps."
    I walked away from him, gesturing to him that I didn’t want anybody around, and when I was some distance away, I sat down on the grass. There, I used to talk with the little flowers of the Good Lord.
    A moment later, I looked behind me, and there I found Maximin sitting close to me. Straightway he says to me: "Keep me with you. I’ll be very good."
    But the natural evil in me will not hear reason. I jump to my feet, and run a little farther off without saying a word and again I start playing with the little flowers of the Good Lord. In an instant, Maximin was there again, telling me he would be very good, that he wouldn’t talk, that he would get bored all by himself, and that his Master had sent him to be with me, etc. This time, I took pity, I gestured to him to sit down, and I kept on playing with the little flowers of the Good Lord.
    It wasn’t long before Maximin broke the silence by bursting into laughter (I think he was making fun of me). I look at him and he says to me: "Let’s have some fun, let’s make up a game". I said nothing in reply, for I was so ignorant I didn’t understand what games with other people were, always having been alone. I played with the flowers, on my own, and Maximin came right up close to me, doing nothing but laughing, telling me the flowers didn’t have ears to listen to me and that we should play together instead. But I had no liking for the game he told me to play. I started talking to him, however, and he told me that the ten days he was to spend with his Master would soon be over and then he would go home to his father in Corps etc...
    While he was talking, I heard the bell of La Salette, it was the Angelus. I gestured to Maximin to lift his soul up to God. He took off his hat and was silent for a moment. Then I said: "Do you want to have dinner?" "Yes, he replied, let’s eat." We sat down and I brought out of my bag the provisions my Master had given me. As was my habit, before breaking into my little round loaf, I made a cross with the point of my knife in the bread, and a little hole in the middle, saying: "If the devil’s in there, may he leave, and if the Good Lord is in there, may he stay!" and I rapidly covered up the little hole. Maximin burst into laughter and kicked the loaf out of my hands. It rolled down the mountainside and was lost from site. I had another piece of bread which we shared. Afterwards, we played a game. Then, realizing that Maximin must still be hungry, I pointed out a place on the mountainside covered with all kinds of berries. I urged him to go and eat some and he went straight away. He ate a few berries and brought back his hat full of them. In the evening we walked back down the mountain together and promised to come back the next day and watch over our cows together.
    The next day, the 19th of September, I met Maximin on the way up. We climbed up the mountain side together. I discovered that Maximin was a very good, simple boy, and would willingly talk about what I wanted to talk about. He was also very flexible and had no fixed opinions. He was just a little curious, for, when I walked away from him, as soon as he saw I had stopped, he would run over to me to see what I was doing and hear what I was saying to the flowers of the Good Lord. And if he arrived too late, he would ask me what I had said.
    Maximin told me to teach him a game. It was already late morning. I told him to gather some flowers for the "Paradise". We set to work together. Soon we had a number of flowers of various colours. I could hear the village Angelus ringing, for the weather was fine and there wasn’t a cloud in the sky. Having told the Good Lord what we had learned, I said to Maximin that we ought to drive our cows on to a small plateau near the gully, where there would be stones to build the "Paradise". We drove our cows to the selected spot and then had a small meal. Then we started collecting stones to build our little house, which comprised of a so-called ground floor which was where we were to live, and then a story above which was to be, as we called it, "Paradise."
    This story was decorated all over with different-coloured flowers, with garlands hanging from flower stalks. This "Paradise" was covered by a single large stone which we had strewn with flowers. We had also hung garlands all the way round. When we had finished, we sat and looked at the "Paradise". We began to feel sleepy and having moved a couple of feet away, we went to sleep on the grass.
    II
    When I woke up I couldn’t see the cows, so I called Maximin and climbed up the little mound. From there I could see our cows grazing peacefully and I was on my way down, with Maximin on his way up, when all at once I saw a beautiful light shining more brightly than the sun.
    "Maximin, do you see what is over there? Oh! my God!" At the same moment, I dropped the stick I was holding. Something inconceivably fantastic passed through me in that moment, and I felt myself being drawn. I felt a great respect, full of love, and my heart beat faster.
    I kept my eyes firmly fixed on this light, which was static, and as if it had opened up, I caught sight of another, much more brilliant light which was moving, and in this light I saw a most beautiful lady sitting on top of our Paradise, with her head in her hands.
    This beautiful Lady stood up, she coolly crossed her arms while watching us, and said to us:
    "Come, my children, fear not, I am here to PROCLAIM GREAT NEWS TO YOU."
    These soft and sweet words made me fly to her, and my heart desired to attach itself to her forever.
    When I was up close to the Beautiful Lady, in front of her to her right, she began to speak and from her beautiful eyes tears also started to flow.
    "If my people do not wish to submit themselves, I am forced to let go off the hand of my Son. It is so heavy and weighs me down so much I can no longer keep hold of it.
    I have suffered all of the time for the rest of you! If I do not wish my Son to abandon you, I must take it upon myself to pray for this continually. And the rest of you think little of this. In vain you will pray, in vain you will act, you will never be able to make up for the troubles I have taken over for the rest of you.
    I gave you six days to work, I kept the seventh for myself, and no one wishes to grant it to me. This is what weighs down the arm of my Son so much.
    Those who drive carts cannot speak without putting the name of my Son in the middle.
    These are the two things which weigh down the arm of my Son so much. If the harvest is spoiled, it is only because of the rest of you. I made you see this last year with the potatoes, you took little account of this. It was quite the opposite when you found bad potatoes, you swore oaths, and you included the name of my Son. They will continue to go bad, at Christmas there will be none left."
    At this point, I was trying to interpret the word "potatoes" (pommes de terre): I thought I understood it to be "apples" (pommes). The Beautiful and Good Lady, reading my thoughts, repeated thus:
    "You do not understand, my children. I will tell it to you another way.
    "If the harvest is spoiled, it does not seem to affect you. I made you see this last year with the potatoes. You took little account of this. It was quite the opposite when you found bad potatoes, you swore oaths, and you included the name of my Son. They will continue to go bad and at Christmas, there will be none left.
    If you have corn, you must not sow it. The beasts will eat all that you sow. And all that grows will fall to dust when you thresh it. A great famine will come. Before the famine comes, children under the age of seven will begin to tremble and will die in the arms of those who hold them. The others will do penance through hunger. The nuts will go bad, the grapes will become rotten."
    At this point, the Beautiful Lady, who was entrancing me, for a moment did not make herself heard. I could see, however, that she was continuing, as if speaking, to move graciously her kindly lips. At this moment, Maximin was receiving his secret. Then, turning to me, the Most Holy Virgin spoke to me and gave me a secret in French. Here is this secret in its entirety as she gave it to me:
    "Mélanie, what I am going to tell you now will not always be a secret; you can publish it in 1858.
    "Priests, my Son's ministers, priests, by their evil life, by their irreverences and their impiety in celebrating the holy mysteries, love of money, love of honor and pleasures, priests have become sewers of impurity. Yes, priests call forth vengeance, and vengeance is suspended over their heads. Woe to priests, and to persons consecrated to God, who by their infidelities and their evil life are crucifying my son anew! The sins of persons consecrated to God cry to heaven and call for vengeance, and now here is vengeance at their very doors, for no longer is anyone found to beg mercy and pardon for the people; there are no more generous souls, there is now no one worthy of offering the spotless Victim to the Eternal on the worlds behalf.
    "God will strike in an unparalleled manner. Woe to the inhabitants of the earth! God will exhaust His anger, and no one will be able to escape so many evils at once. The heads, the leaders of the people of God, have neglected prayer and penance, and the devil has darkened their minds; they have become those wandering stars which the ancient devil will drag with his tail to destruction. God will permit the ancient serpent to sow divisions among rulers, in all societies and in all families; both physical and moral punishments will be suffered. God will abandon men to themselves and will send chastisements one after the other for over 35 years.
    "Society is on the very eve of most terrible scourges and greatest events; one must expect to be governed by a rod of iron and to drink the chalice of God's wrath.
    "Let not my Son's Vicar, the Sovereign Pontiff Pius IX leave Rome after the year 1859; but let him be steadfast and generous, let him do battle with the weapons of faith and love; I shall be with him.
    "Let him beware of Napoleon; his heart is double, and when he will want to be both Pope and emperor at the same time, God will soon withdraw from him; he is that eagle who, desiring always to rise, will fall on the sword he wanted to use to force the peoples to exalt him.
    "Italy will be punished for its ambition in wanting to shake of the yoke of the Lord of lords; thus she will be handed over to war; blood will flow on all sides; Churches will be closed or desecrated; priests, religious will be driven out; they will be put to death, and to a cruel death. Many will abandon the faith, and the number of priests and religious who will separate themselves from the true religion will be great; even Bishops will be found among these persons.
    "Let the Pope beware of miracle workers, for the time has come for the most astonishing wonders to take place on the earth and in the air.
    "In the year 1864 Lucifer, together with a great number of devils, will be loosed from hell; little by little they will abolish the faith, and that even in persons consecrated to God; they will so blind them, that without a special grace, these persons will take on the spirit of these evil angels; a number of religious houses will lose the faith entirely and cause many souls to be damned.
    "Bad books will abound over the earth, and the spirits of darkness will everywhere spread universal relaxation in everything concerning God's service: they will have very great power over nature; there will be churches to serve these spirits. People will be transported form one place to another by these evil spirits, and even priests, because they will not have lived by the good spirit of the gospel, which is a spirit of humility, charity and zeal for the glory of God. The dead and the just will be made to rise."
    [Mélanie interpolated here: "That is to say, these dead will assume the prospect of righteous souls who once lived on earth, in order to seduce men more easily; these so-called resurrected dead, who will be nothing other than the devil under these faces, will preach another Gospel contrary to that of the true Christ Jesus, denying the existence of heaven, if these be not in fact the souls of the damned. All these souls will appear joined to their bodies."]
    "There will be extraordinary wonders every place because the true faith has been extinguished and false light illumines the world. Woe to the princes of the church who will be occupied only with piling up riches upon riches, with guarding their authority and lording with pride!
    "My Son's Vicar will have much to suffer, because for a time the Church will be handed over to great persecutions: it will be the time of darkness; the Church will undergo a frightful crisis.
    "With God's holy faith forgotten, each individual will want to direct himself and rise above his peers. Civil and ecclesiastical authority will be abolished , all order and justice will be trampled underfoot. Only murders, hatred, jealousy, lying and discord will be seen, with no love of country or family.
    "The Holy Father will suffer greatly. I shall be with him till the end to receive his sacrifice.
    "The wicked will make a number of attempts on his life without being able to harm him; but neither he nor his successor will see the triumph of God's Church.
    "Civil governments will all have the same objective, which will be to abolish and make every religious principle disappear, to make way for materialism, atheism, spiritism and vices of all kinds.
    "In the year 1865, the abomination will be seen in the holy places; in the convents the flowers of the Church will putrefy, and the devil will establish himself as king of all hearts. Let those who are at the head of religious communities be on their guard concerning the persons they are to receive, because the devil will use all his malice to introduce into religious orders persons given to sin, for disorders and love of carnal pleasures will be widespread over the whole earth.
    "France, Italy, Spain and England will be at war, blood will flow in the streets; Frenchmen will fight Frenchmen, Italian with Italian; then there will be a general war which will be appalling. For some time God will no longer remember France or Italy, because the Gospel of Jesus Christ is no longer known. The wicked will unleash all their malice; even in homes there will be killing and mutual massacres.
    "With the first lightning blow of His sword, the mountains and all nature will tremble with dread, because the disorders and crimes of men are piercing the vault of the heavens. Paris will be burned and Marseilles swallowed up; a number of large cities will be shattered and swallowed by earthquakes; all will seem lost; only murders will be seen, the clash of arms and blasphemies heard. The righteous will suffer greatly; their prayers, their penances and their tears will rise to heaven and all God's people will ask pardon and mercy and will ask my help and intercession. Then Jesus Christ, by an act of His justice and His great mercy toward the righteous, will command His angels to put all His enemies to death. At one blow the persecutors of the Church of Jesus Christ and all men given to sin will perish, and the earth will become like a desert.
    "Then there will be peace, the reconciliation of God with men; Jesus Christ will be served, adored and glorified; charity will flourish everywhere. The new kings will be the right arm of Holy Church, which will be strong, humble, pious, poor, zealous and imitative of the virtues of Jesus Christ. The Gospel will be preached everywhere, and men will make great strides in the faith, because there will be unity among Jesus Christ's workers and men will live in the fear of God.
    "This peace among men will not last long: 25 years of abundant harvests will make them forget that the sins of men are the cause of all the woes which happen on earth.
    "A precursor of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; e will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god.
    "The earth will be struck with plagues of all kinds;" [Mélanie added here: "Besides pestilence and famine, which will be widespread"] "there will be wars up to the last war, which will then be waged by the ten kings of the Antichrist, kings who will all have a common design and will be the sole rulers of the world. Before this happens, there will be a sort of false peace in the world; people will think only of amusing themselves; the wicked will indulge in all kinds of sin; but the children of Holy Church, children of the true faith, my true imitators, will grow in the love of God and in the virtues dearest to me. Happy the humble souls lead by the Holy Ghost! I shall battle along with them until they reach the fullness of maturity.
    "Nature begs vengeance on account of men, and she shudders with dread, awaiting what must happen to the crime-stained earth.
    "Tremble, earth, and you who profess to serve Jesus Christ, while interiorly you adore yourselves, tremble; for God will hand you over to His enemy, because the holy places are in a state of corruption; many convents are no longer houses of God, but pastures for Asmodeus and his own.
    "It will be at this time that the Antichrist will be born of a Hebrew nun, a false virgin who will be in communication with the ancient serpent, master of impurity; his father will be a bishop (Ev.). [We spell out the word "bishop" here. In the French text appear only the first two letters of évèque, the French word for bishop, but there is little doubt that this is the word they stand for, because in Mélanie's first draft of the message the whole word is spelled out.]
    "At birth he will vomit blasphemies, he will have teeth; in a word, this will be the devil incarnate; he will utter terrifying cries, he will work wonders, he will live only on impurities. He will have brothers who, although not incarnate devils like himself, will be children of evil; at the age of twelve, they will be noted for the valiant victories they will win; soon they will each be at the head of armies, assisted by legions from hell.
    "The seasons will be changed, the earth will produce only bad fruits, the heavenly bodies will lose the regularity of their movements, the moon will reflect only a feeble reddish light; water and fire will lend convulsive motions to the earth's sphere, causing mountains , cities, etc., to be swallowed up.
    "Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of the Antichrist.
    "The demons of the air, together with the Antichrist, will work great wonders on the earth and in the air, and men will become ever more perverted. God will take care of His faithful servants and mend of good will; the Gospel will be preached everywhere, all peoples and all nations will have knowledge of the Truth.
    "I address a pressing appeal to the earth: I call upon the true disciples of the God living and reigning in the heavens; I call upon the true imitators of Christ made man, the one true Savior of men; I call upon my children, my true devotees, those who have given themselves o me so that I may lead them to my Divine Son, those whom I bear as it were in my arms, those who have lived in my spirit; finally, I call upon the Apostles of the Latter Times, the faithful disciples of Jesus Christ who have lived in contempt of the world and of themselves, in poverty and humility, in contempt and silence, in prayer and mortification, in chastity and in union with God, in suffering, and unknown to the world. It is time for them to emerge and come enlighten the earth. Go, show yourselves to be my dear children; I am with you and in you, provided your faith is the light enlightening you in these evil times. May your zeal make your famished for the glory and honor of Jesus Christ. Do battle, children of light, you, the few who see thereby; fir the time of times, the end of ends, is at hand.
    "The Church will be eclipsed, the world will be in consternation. But there are Enoch and Elias, they will preach with the power of God, and men of good will will believe in God, and many souls will be comforted; they will make great progress by virtue of the Holy Ghost and will condemn the diabolical errors of the Antichrist.
    "Woe to the inhabitants of the earth. There will be bloody wars, and famines; plagues and contagious diseases; there will be frightful showers of animals; thunders which will demolish cities; earthquakes which will engulf countries; voices will be heard in the air; men will beat their heads against the walls; they will call on death, yet death will constitute their torment; blood will flow on all sides. Who could overcome, if God doesn't shorten the time of trial? At the blood, tears and prayers of the righteous, God will relent; Enoch and Elias will be put to death; pagan Rome will disappear; the fire of Heaven will fall and consume three cities; the whole universe will be struck with terror, and many will allow themselves to be seduced because they didn't adore the true Christ living in their midst. It is time; the sun is darkening; Faith alone will survive.
    "The time is at hand; the abyss is opening. Here is the king of the kings of darkness. Here is the beast with its subjects, calling itself the savior of the world. In pride he will rise skyward to go up to Heaven; he will be stifled by the breath of St. Michael the Archangel. He will fall and the earth -which for three days will be in constant change- will open its fiery bosom; he will be plunged forever with all his followers into hell's eternal chasms. Then water and fire will purify the earth and consume all the works of men's pride, and everything [/b][/color]
    will be renewed; God will be served and glorified."

    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +189/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #7 on: September 21, 2010, 05:11:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That was the message I always found confusing and awkward.  I know it is all over the net.  If you are worried that this is an attack on Our Lady, don't be.  It is more in defense of her.  Nor is it an attack on Melanie.  The human memory is not set in cement and Melanie wrote this 30 some years after the apparition.

    People do what they want to do and believe what they want to believe.  And it often has more to do with appetite than truth.  That may be why there are so few Catholics, lol.  In the end, each person will believe what they want.  After all, it's their business.
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.


    Offline Classiccom

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 768
    • Reputation: +0/-2
    • Gender: Male
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #8 on: September 21, 2010, 11:27:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Trinity
    That was the message I always found confusing and awkward.  I know it is all over the net.  If you are worried that this is an attack on Our Lady, don't be.  It is more in defense of her.  Nor is it an attack on Melanie.  The human memory is not set in cement and Melanie wrote this 30 some years after the apparition.

    People do what they want to do and believe what they want to believe.  And it often has more to do with appetite than truth.  That may be why there are so few Catholics, lol.  In the end, each person will believe what they want.  After all, it's their business.


    ====================


    1 Peter 2 >>
    Douay-Rheims Bible   
     
    1 Wherefore laying away all malice, and all guile, and dissimulations, and envies, and all detractions, 2 As newborn babes, desire the rational milk without guile, that thereby you may grow unto salvation: 3 If so be you have tasted that the Lord is sweet.

    4 Unto whom coming, as to a living stone, rejected indeed by men, but chosen and made honourable by God: 5 Be you also as living stones built up, a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

    6 Wherefore it is said in the scripture: Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious. And he that shall believe in him, shall not be confounded.

    ========================

      I think toxic Chinese drywall is being substituted for the approved building material. Faith is always described as being build on Rock - solid as opposed to loose ends of the signs and wonders world.

    Offline Trinity

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3233
    • Reputation: +189/-0
    • Gender: Female
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #9 on: September 22, 2010, 06:16:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Classicom, your intelligence is showing.  Or lack thereof.  I was referring (obviously) to Melanie's (or anyone's) ability to remember exactly what was said thirty some years after the fact.  Your self confidence does not benefit you.
    +RIP
    Please pray for the repose of her soul.

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8017
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #10 on: September 22, 2010, 04:42:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Maximin: "We were but a channel, like parrots that repeat what they have heard. We were stupid before the apparition, we were stupid after the apparition and we shall be stupid all our lives."
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline Lighthouse

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 872
    • Reputation: +580/-27
    • Gender: Male
    Re-evaluating La Sallette
    « Reply #11 on: September 22, 2010, 11:54:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Trinity  


    "I think the best that can be said about Gary Giuffre is that he is an arch kook".


    I'd put these three in the same category:

    Stephen Hand.
    Sean what's his name.
    Brother Feenyite.