I never knew about this before. In Vatican II, it has become "acceptable" to allow Eastern churches to drop the Filioque cause, which of course was one of the reasons for the Orthodox schism, their rejection of this clause.
Therefore, this practice hints at acceptance of the Orthodox, just like Ratzinger suggested acceptance of the Anglicans recently ( hinting that we are all one big happy family ). The problem is that Rome is not really Catholic so it can't really bridge any gap with the Orthodox or anyone else.
Here is Ratzinger saying the Nicene Creed sans Filioque along with the Orthodox patriarch.
The woman who posted this, Anna Paitian, is formerly Orthodox. I barely pay attention to what is going on in that world, but maybe I should. When I saw this I nearly leapt out of my seat.
Here is proof that that is indeed what is happening in the video, "Father Z's" blog where he praises this act of apostasy.
http://wdtprs.com/blog/2008/06/benedict-xvi-and-bartholomew-i-together-the-creed-in-greek/By the way, I already know what you will say, Caminus. You will say that if he is a true Pope, he can remove the Filioque if he wants. But even if he were, which he's not, he can't.