Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis  (Read 949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Reputation: +2439/-557
  • Gender: Male
Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
« on: November 26, 2019, 05:31:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • A serious question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм thesis to be true. Can you give me a good answer why holding it doesn’t contradict this proposition from the Vatican Council?:


    The First Vatican Council, Sess. 4, Chap. 3, July 18, 1870: “1. That Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff hold primacy over the whole world… full power to feed, rule, and guide the universal Church… 9. If anyone thus speaks, that the Roman Pontiff has only the office of inspection or direction but not the full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the universal Church, not only in things which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to discipline and government… let him be anathema.”
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #1 on: November 26, 2019, 06:34:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bump. Any help here would be appreciated.
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10060
    • Reputation: +5256/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #2 on: November 27, 2019, 11:41:20 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • It would be interesting to hear from someone who holds this position (Ladislaus?).  I do not, but I *think* the idea is that these men are not popes, but I may (still) be confused about that.  Also, I'm not sure that the portion of the Council that you highlighted applies.  Perhaps DesLauriers' (or Bishop Sanborn's) writings on the CT address it?
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10060
    • Reputation: +5256/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #3 on: December 02, 2019, 07:07:15 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am bumping this again, because I am interested in hearing from Ladislaus +/or some other person that agrees with the Cassiciacuм Thesis as well.  Perhaps they were busy over Thanksgiving holiday....
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #4 on: December 02, 2019, 08:22:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This quote has nothing to do with CT.

    Why don't you start by explaining why you think that it contradicts CT.

    This is a dogmatic teaching regarding the nature of papal authority vs. the errors of the Orthodox and other schismatics.  If anything it goes against R&R.

    CT merely states that the person has been duly elected (received the designation of the Church) but has an impediment to exercising the authority formally.  


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31196
    • Reputation: +27113/-494
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #5 on: December 02, 2019, 09:28:30 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is a CRISIS IN THE CHURCH thread if I ever saw one.

    Please observe the proper sub-forums!
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #6 on: December 02, 2019, 11:38:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This quote has nothing to do with CT.

    Why don't you start by explaining why you think that it contradicts CT.

    This is a dogmatic teaching regarding the nature of papal authority vs. the errors of the Orthodox and other schismatics.  If anything it goes against R&R.

    CT merely states that the person has been duly elected (received the designation of the Church) but has an impediment to exercising the authority formally.  
    This quote has nothing to do with CT.

    Why don't you start by explaining why you think that it contradicts CT.“

    I think it's self explanatory if one is to believe he (Bergoglio) is a true pope.

    “ This is a dogmatic teaching regarding the nature of papal authority vs. the errors of the Orthodox and other schismatics.  If anything it goes against R&R.”

    I absolutely agree with you.

    “ CT merely states that the person has been duly elected (received the designation of the Church) but has an impediment to exercising the authority formally. “

    Fair enough, that’s an adequate answer to my question. So basically, you and others who hold the thesis suggest that he is in no way a true or real pope, just a place holder?  
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #7 on: December 02, 2019, 11:43:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am bumping this again, because I am interested in hearing from Ladislaus +/or some other person that agrees with the Cassiciacuм Thesis as well.  Perhaps they were busy over Thanksgiving holiday....
    Why would someone downvote you for this post?
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10060
    • Reputation: +5256/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #8 on: December 02, 2019, 11:47:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why would someone downvote you for this post?
    Because I suspect a particular member who comes back over and over again goes out of his way to downvote my posts.  I've gotten used to it.
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10060
    • Reputation: +5256/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #9 on: December 02, 2019, 12:52:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I didn't think there was anything wrong with your question, QVD.  Lad's response came off quite defensive.  
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #10 on: December 02, 2019, 02:52:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I think it's self explanatory if one is to believe he (Bergoglio) is a true pope.

    Well, here's the cause of your confusion, the equivocal use of the expression "true pope".

    According to CT, Bergoglio is not a true pope, but more in the state of a pope-elect who never took on the office due to an impediment.  Bergoglio cannot exercise papal authority.  Bergoglio is not a pope in re, in actuality or in reality, but merely a pope in potentia ... in potency.

    It's very similar to the state of a newly-elected U.S. President in the month of December right after a November election.  Is he a "true" President?  Well, he's been elected, but he has no authority.  Same thing applies to Bergoglio.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #11 on: December 02, 2019, 02:54:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps DesLauriers' (or Bishop Sanborn's) writings on the CT address it?

    Yes, Bishop Sanborn specifically answers the question, "is [can't remember when he wrote it] a true pope?"  He answers in the negative.  But I can't find the link right now.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41899
    • Reputation: +23942/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #12 on: December 02, 2019, 02:56:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I didn't think there was anything wrong with your question, QVD.  Lad's response came off quite defensive.  

    No, I wasn't being defensive.  I just don't see how CT contradicts the quotation ... so, rather than speculate, I was asking that Quo first articulate what he perceives to be the point of contradiction.

    [PS -- I did not downthumb anything.]

    I've been rather busy lately, so my responses are much shorter than usual.

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #13 on: December 02, 2019, 03:18:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I didn't think there was anything wrong with your question, QVD.  Lad's response came off quite defensive.  
    Thanks Vermont, but I didn’t take Lad’s post in a bad way after reading the whole thing.
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4198
    • Reputation: +2439/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Question for those who hold the Cassiciacuм Thesis
    « Reply #14 on: December 02, 2019, 03:26:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, here's the cause of your confusion, the equivocal use of the expression "true pope".

    According to CT, Bergoglio is not a true pope, but more in the state of a pope-elect who never took on the office due to an impediment.  Bergoglio cannot exercise papal authority.  Bergoglio is not a pope in re, in actuality or in reality, but merely a pope in potentia ... in potency.

    It's very similar to the state of a newly-elected U.S. President in the month of December right after a November election.  Is he a "true" President?  Well, he's been elected, but he has no authority.  Same thing applies to Bergoglio.
    I appreciate all of your answers and I don’t reject the thesis outright. It seems to me that the only issue it resolves is the ability for the Church to obtain a true pope. I don’t see it as an answer to the issue of a visible magisterium. Can you tell me what other problems, if any, it resolves?
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?