See Myrna, they spend hours defending things like this, denial of dogma. Anyone who recognizes Ratzinger as Pontiff does this. Now watch the snideful remarks about us sedes start again.
That is alright with me. I am so happy with my priest and Chruch and faith. I have more friends than I ever did now that I am sedevacantist. Not exactly the sad sacks they like to paint us as are we Myrna?
Why? Why was this comment necessary? I've read enough snide remarks (the quoted being one of them) going BOTH ways in here that no side has a leg to stand on in accusing the other side of snide remarks.
I think what Dawn meant was, why are SSPX stuck on things like conditional baptism when she posted this ever so grave report on
"Cardinal" Ratzinger Denies Catholic Dogma on Original Sin: If I were SSPX, I certainly would be asking my superior about this before I was concerned about conditional Baptism.
Having said this however, and since this information was just posted today, I feel that many here will check it out. Myself included. I had no idea he was that bold.
Topic: Question for Myrna (Read 7187 times)