Author Topic: Question for Gladius and or Cletus (Read 4822 times)

Cletus · « **Reply #5 on:** September 05, 2008, 07:23:42 PM »

Pope Leo XIII declared that the orders imposed by Anglican bishops were invalid.

How much more would he have said the same about those imposed by the so-called bishops in Appalachian snake handler territory. (Were there any who tried to fake priesthood at all.)

So who on earth is Guimares talking about when he talks about the Church's recognizing the validity of Protestant orders?

Maybe Guimares has Orthodoxy in mind. But he wrote about Protestantism. He is throwing idiotic fantasy into the faces of sedevacantists and just hoping that for all that something will stick to make them look bad.

That's despicable.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #6 on:** September 05, 2008, 08:11:49 PM »

FWIW - This "letter" is in response to an email that I sent in to TIA. Since it is addressed to E.S., which are my initials, I suspected this was the case. Going to TIA, I saw that they had posted my email, as well as the response thereto.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #7 on:** September 05, 2008, 08:17:01 PM »

Quote from: Cletus

I think that with Guimares the misrepresenation of what sedevacantists hold about Novus Ordo sacraments is more than an oversight. He's laboring overtime to make them look as bad as possible, truth be damned.

When one is trying to put one over on sheople who have neither the time nor desire to look into the matter, anything goes.

BTW - I never actually received this response myself. The first time I saw it was when it was posted on this board. Odd, no?

sedetrad · « **Reply #8 on:** September 05, 2008, 09:27:37 PM »

I found his response to your letter to be asinine. Thank you both for your well thought out responses. I agree with both of you.

Andy

Dawn · « **Reply #9 on:** September 06, 2008, 07:14:13 AM »

I read this yesterday and thought to myself, hmm ES. Bet that is my old friend Gladius.

As far as anti-Pope. If you become a heretic while in the Papacy you are a anti-Pope right? But, if you are a heretic before you are named Pope, like JPII and B16 the whole thing was a sham from the start, you never could have been the Pontiff. So then, is there another term to describe these men?
Not trying to argue, but it seems there should be another term. anti-christ with a small A perhaps?