Caminus said:You speak of 'anti-pope' as if it has it's own ontological existence.
"Ontological existence"? "Ontological" MEANS "pertaining to existence." Wikipedia: Ontology "is the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence or reality in general."
I don't usually pick on people for mistakes like this. The problem is that you often try to sound like an expert theologian, bully people with use of impressive-sounding words, and so on. Those already predisposed to the SSPX position would simply read through your verbal pottage and nod, thinking "Yep, he's got it down all right" without being able to understand what you're talking about, but assuming you are an expert due to your tone of confidence, which as you and I both know is a bluff.
A certain non-Pope currently pretending to reign in Rome uses a similar technique. He simply exhausts people with double-minded speech so that they don't bother to read what he's saying, which often is heretical. They just think "'Hermeneutic of continuity', huh? Sounds like a Pope!"