Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Proof of the current sede vacante  (Read 5717 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Proof of the current sede vacante
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2009, 01:28:35 PM »
Quote from: tadeas
All who as christians have become freemasons are automatically excomunicated.


even if-I mean a big IF-these events happened, does not mean those men joined Masons.....

Proof of the current sede vacante
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2009, 01:30:12 PM »
Quote from: tadeas
Quote from: kamalayka
I don't think John Paul II or Benedict XVI have ever supported these groups!

"Wherefore We command most strictly and in virtue of holy obedience, all the faithful of whatever state...that none, under any pretext or for any reason, shall dare or presume... to receive them in their houses or  dwellings... be present with them... to give them in any way advice, encouragement."

JP2 and B16 did these things.

Quote from: kamalayka
And if they did, it still would not justify breaking away from the Church.

"under pain of excommunication for all the above mentioned people, which is incurred by the very deed without any declaration being required"


again, accusations out of thin air....PROOF??


Proof of the current sede vacante
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2009, 01:32:10 PM »
I talked to a few Masons i worked with, shared acoffee with them........EEKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, now I suddenly am one??????? read your own Papal quote, talking to one, visiting with one does not automatically make you one......

Proof of the current sede vacante
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2009, 02:26:16 PM »
There are a couple of us here who do not see the chair of Peter as vacant even though we reject the v2 anti-popes since 1958. We of course believe that Gregory XVII was True Pope( for better or for worse) until 1989.

Over a 30 yr period he would have appointed a Curia in petto and they would have elected a new Pope although I do not know who it is.

Proof of the current sede vacante
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2009, 09:50:24 AM »