Author Topic: Proof of the current sede vacante (Read 2524 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #1 on:** October 08, 2009, 09:46:08 AM »

It is one of the strongest arguments against the post-conciliar popes that their change in attitude towards the enemies of the Church is incompatible with their office.

It is also one of the hardest to advance, because so few Catholics understand the role of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #2 on:** October 18, 2009, 08:49:32 AM »

Truth to the Power.

Classiccom · « **Reply #3 on:** October 18, 2009, 09:25:57 AM »

Tadeos Quote

"All who as christians have become freemasons are automatically excomunicated. This is said by several papal bulls. But not only this. In the bull In Eminenti of Clement XII, 1738, is declared that masonic and similar societes are condemned, and that is excomunicated who favours them, receives them in his home, apartment or elsewhere, and provides them, directly or indirectly, publicly or secretively, an advice or help.
"

========================================

This explains why I only had luck with the daughters of 33rd degree Masons. ! I guess I was targeted.

CM · « **Reply #4 on:** October 19, 2009, 05:29:56 AM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

It is also one of the hardest to advance, because so few Catholics understand the role of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

Now for some interesting irony:

Learn all about the Freemasons, in a video put together by Muslims, of all people.

Note that the video takes a turn towards falsehood around the 45 minute mark, but what they say about the "dajal" should be applied to Antichrist.

Also remember that the Freemasons are the puppets, that's right the puppets of the Jєωιѕн Mafia, the apostate State of Israel, who is pulling ALL the strings.

kamalayka · « **Reply #5 on:** October 19, 2009, 12:37:08 PM »

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** October 19, 2009, 01:04:13 PM »

Could you give us the name of a pope besides Urban Vi who has murdered or raped anyone-- and he will be declared anti-pope someday as will Boniface.

Any other Pope who may hav e done that has been declared anti-pope.

The people falsely claiming to have the God-given right to establish their own church are the v2 anti-popes.

tadeas · « **Reply #7 on:** October 19, 2009, 02:32:03 PM »

Quote from: kamalayka

I don't think John Paul II or Benedict XVI have ever supported these groups!

"Wherefore We command most strictly and in virtue of holy obedience, all the faithful of whatever state...that none, under any pretext or for any reason, shall dare or presume... to receive them in their houses or dwellings... be present with them... to give them in any way advice, encouragement."

JP2 and B16 did these things.

Quote from: kamalayka

And if they did, it still would not justify breaking away from the Church.

"under pain of excommunication for all the above mentioned people, which is incurred by the very deed without any declaration being required"

CM · « **Reply #8 on:** October 22, 2009, 09:09:21 PM »

Quote from: tadeas

Quote from: kamalayka
And if they did, it still would not justify breaking away from the Church.

"under pain of excommunication for all the above mentioned people, which is incurred by the very deed without any declaration being required"

Hence THEY broke away from the Church, not those who rightly reject them as excommunicated antipopes.

Belloc · « **Reply #9 on:** October 29, 2009, 01:27:13 PM »

Belloc · « **Reply #10 on:** October 29, 2009, 01:28:35 PM »

Quote from: tadeas

All who as christians have become freemasons are automatically excomunicated.

even if-I mean a big IF-these events happened, does not mean those men joined Masons.....

Belloc · « **Reply #11 on:** October 29, 2009, 01:30:12 PM »

Quote from: tadeas

Quote from: kamalayka
I don't think John Paul II or Benedict XVI have ever supported these groups!

"Wherefore We command most strictly and in virtue of holy obedience, all the faithful of whatever state...that none, under any pretext or for any reason, shall dare or presume... to receive them in their houses or dwellings... be present with them... to give them in any way advice, encouragement."

JP2 and B16 did these things.

Quote from: kamalayka
And if they did, it still would not justify breaking away from the Church.

"under pain of excommunication for all the above mentioned people, which is incurred by the very deed without any declaration being required"

again, accusations out of thin air....PROOF??

Belloc · « **Reply #12 on:** October 29, 2009, 01:32:10 PM »

I talked to a few Masons i worked with, shared acoffee with them........EEKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, now I suddenly am one??????? read your own Papal quote, talking to one, visiting with one does not automatically make you one......

roscoe · « **Reply #13 on:** October 29, 2009, 02:26:16 PM »

There are a couple of us here who do not see the chair of Peter as vacant even though we reject the v2 anti-popes since 1958. We of course believe that Gregory XVII was True Pope( for better or for worse) until 1989.

Over a 30 yr period he would have appointed a Curia in petto and they would have elected a new Pope although I do not know who it is.

tadeas · « **Reply #14 on:** October 30, 2009, 09:50:24 AM »