Thank you for the post.Father Wathen had the grace to discern the newChurch papal hijacking when most traditionalist were willing to give the modernist popes ever benefit of the doubt.
This simple, but highly intelligent Diocese priest led the traditionalist movement with his 1971 book, The Great Sacrilege. He put everything on the line, even taking-on the homo jew-pope, Paul VI.Father was onto the ʝʊdɛօ-masonic infiltration of the Church and made the jews were nervous they'd lose control of the traditionalist movement. Only then was +ABL's SSPX infiltrated, financed and given the media attention allowing them to be on the forefront of the Trad- world. And now we can see, those hireling-chickens have come home to roost, in the form of the Menzingen brothehood.Sedeprivationism is a term coined by William J. Morgan an English layman and a traditional Catholic apologist.
The word
Sedeprivationism is an amalgamation of two words, “
sede” and “deprivation” into a single descriptive term. Morgan developed the term in order distinguish it from
Sedevacantism, a position which he held himself.
[1]He applied the term to one of the Catholic theological explanations for the Vatican II crisis. It holds that the
Novus Ordo Popes have been defective Popes. This analysis follows the principles of the late French theologian, Bishop Michel Louis Guerard des Lauriers, O.P.. Bishop Guerard des Lauriers presented his thesis in a publication with the title “
Cahiers de Cassiciacuм” and therefore called commonly the
"Cassiciacuм Thesis."Accordingly,
Sedeprivationism might be defined as an ecclesiastical Catholic position that the papacy, the See of Peter, is not obtained and held in conformity with one of two prescribed requirements of a legitimate papal election by the Novus Ordo popes. The two mandatory requirements are:
1. That the pope is elected legitimately by valid designated electors. This aspect designates the papal candidate as “
materially”
[2] elected and designated candidate to the office of pope.
2. That the newly chosen pope-elect expresses his acceptance and that on giving his assent he receive from Christ the “
form” of the Papacy i.e. the indefectible power or authority promised to St. Peter and his successors by which the elected candidate “
formally” becomes Pope and actually takes hold of the Office of the Papacy.
Both of these aspects are required and should any candidate fail in either one, then he does not hold the office of Pope. The Catholics of the
Sedeprivationist school hold that all claimants of the papal office from at least Paul VI through Francis (the
Novus Ordo Popes) are invalid and that they do not hold the papal office except by right of designation due to a failure to receive the “
form” of the Papacy (i.e. the Authority) because his
acceptance is impeded by a defective intention
[3] arising from their manifest disposition of apostasy ; further, that a valid papal election has indeed transpired.
Source
Topic: Privationism in Fr. Wathen's book (Read 10563 times)