So to clarify is it known that Father Ramolla was an editor of, or was directly involved with SSGINFO; but not certain that he is involved, at least not directly, with the current VoV site?
I understand that when SGGINFO was deemed have served its purposes and had become the subject of considerable criticism it was closed down. Were any reasons for the closure ever given by the people who ran the site? Or are we only able to wonder about their reasons for the change?
Clearly the files were given to the operators of VoV (or retained by the same individuals who now run Vov). That course of action may have been a calculated and cunning move, possibly for plausible deniability of any involvement by certain parties whose involvement in SGGINFO had become known.
I don't know who runs VoV, or who gives support to it financially. That is why I asked about some of these things. I would like to know if it has been established with certainty who runs the site, or if the obfuscation of that fact has been successful.
Under the circuмstances, and considering the content on Vov, if a priest is involved formally or otherwise, it is clear that he does not want to put his name to the site, or have his name associated with it. No priests have even been prepared to come out in the open and say they support it, have they?
Coud it be that Fr Hall gave the files to another party or parties who now run all of the sites that are using he same webmaster styles, arrangements, fonts, etc?