I was listening to Brother Bugnolo and he spilled some good info regarding Prevost, and so I dug into this story and found out to be true

Prevost's grandather was actuallly one Salvatore Giovanni Riggitano, a Sicilian immigrant.  So why did this Rigatoni change his name?  Simple.  He was in fact having an adulterous affair, and his wife brought legal charges against him, which led to his arrest.  So Rigatoni here fled and tried to evade justice by changing his name, to John (from Giovanni) Prevost.  Prevost was actually the maiden name of the mother of the woman with who he was committing adultery and whom he later "married", this Suzanne Fontaine (Fontaine was her name, that of her father, whiel her mother's maiden name was Prevost).

Consequently, the very name Prevost was conceived in adultery, and then the subsequent Prevost line derives from adultery.

How interesting it is that one of Bergoglio's first "Magisterial" heresies was in fact Amoris Laetitia, the justification of adultery.

Brother Bugnolo also explained that Prevosts were tied to Chicago mafia, including Marcinkus.  Prevost also has publicly praised Bernardin even while actual Catholics avoid mention of his name due to his sordid predations on young seminarians (in Satanic contexts) ... and then went into Prevost's extensive record of having covered up sɛҳuąƖ predation throughout his career.

Bugnolo predicted an American, likely Prevost, before the Nonclave ... because it's actually American Catholics who are trying to keep the Vatican afloat financially (their finances are evidently a total disaster) ... so the hope was that they get some money from America if they put Prevost out there.

Bugnolo also says that Prevost was chosen right after Alex Soros visited Bergoglio ... suggesting that Soros told him who the next pope would be.

While not all of it can be verified, it does sound rather plausible, and the whole Riggitano -> Prevost (adultery) angle can be and has been verified.

https://rumble.com/v6u3rs7-shocking-pope-leo-xiv-elected-illegally.html

This entire affair is, for my brain, dizzying. 
BTW., the root word for Prévost means "in Charge".
Salvatore was educated in view of the priesthood  but he then never wanted to take vows.
Salvatore "married" Daisy H. in a United Church...or am I in error?

Pope Leo XIV is innocent, we wouldn't want to smear, unjustly, someone's name.
Anyway, okay, they show Louis Marius's Birth Certificate, but is his baptismal Certificate forthcoming? 

*****https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2025/05/21/triangle-amoureux-fuite-hors-du-pays-scandale-de-moeurs--les-genealogistes-ont-resolu-le-mystere-de-la-lignee-prevost-du-pape-leon-xvi
""...
The birth certificate of Louis Lanti Marius Prevost, born on July 28, 1920, in Chicago, lists his parents as Jean Lanti Prevost, born in France and a traveling salesman, and Susanne Louise Marie Fabre, born in France and a housewife.

Almost everything is false, except for the mother's country of birth, which was indeed French.

The mother of Louis Marius Prevost, the new pontiff's grandmother, is Suzanne Fontaine, not Susanne Fabre as written on the birth certificate. She was born in Le Havre on February 2, 1894, the daughter of Ernest Auguste Fontaine, a Norman pastry chef, and Parisian Jeanne Eugénie Prévost—a curious coincidence that immediately caught the attention of genealogists..."

***In the good old days, weren't baptisms refused when parents were public sinners? Pope Francis had a problem with that...probably changed the rule book.
Pray for the True Church +

They excommunicate Archbishop Vigano while taking very little if any action against rapists and thieves

Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey 6/1/2025, 11:19:22 AM

The Novus Ordo is far gone. Most parishioners are divorced - remarried with large mixed families.

Many of them are leading choirs, handing out communion and running ministries within Novus Ordo. Most are for abortion and sodomy.

Rome was sacked almost 500 years ago in 1527. The Muslims around there too.

The nuclear threat. The megavolcanoes in the U.S. and Italy. A massive solar flare. World War III.

These are all possibilities. Something has got to give. Something will have to bring mankind down to his knees if before the consummation of the world.

What is the purpose of this thread? I think we all agree Leo XIV is Francis II in Benedict XVI’d clothes. Dredging up dirt on someone’s ancestors is unnecessary. Leo XIV’s words and actions speak for themselves.

People need to exercise some reading comprehension, and stop gaslighting with fake / pretended sanctimonious sentiments of "charity".  I'm so tired of the pseudo-piety here while at the same time ironically casting slanderous uncharitable aspersions at the one posting the information.  I'm so fed up with the fake / pretended posturing for charity and what Bishop Williamson would call "nitheness" and "chawity" ... and that's even IF this thread had violated any principles of charity despite your gaslighting.

Read it again.  We could perhaps see the work of Divine Providence in the fact that THE first obvious heresy taught by Bergoglio was related to adultery, and here we have the hand-picked successor of Bergoglio, famous in the world as "Robert Prevost" ... a name that was CONCEIVED IN ADULTERY.  It's a FAKE NAME that was invented precisely so that his ancestor could run cover for and escape the consequences of his adulter.  That's EXACTLY what Amoris Laetitia did ... provide an OUT for people who are living in adultery and give them cover for their sin.

If you can't see the ironic work of Divine Providence here, then you are rather dense ... and instead you gaslight me for lacking charity by simply pointing out this stunning coincidence.

Pointing this out is similar to how the Dimond Brothers pointed out the striking correlation between the false High Priests during the time of the Maccabees and various characteristics of the Conciliar popes.

https://www.geni.com/people/Salvatore-Giovanni-Gaetano-Riggitano-John-R-Prevost/6000000218366187822
Excerpt:

"...Salvatore Giovanni Riggitano married Daisy Hughes (1875-1939) on 14 April 1914 at the Immanuel Baptist Church in Chicago. They were in the same household in the 1920 census with no children listed.

*******
Slowly more info is available. Anyone here on CathInfo that has some Church law background to conclude that the "marriage" in 1914 was NULL? Can we presume Salvatore was a Catholic? Probably...Then a Catholic marrying outside the Catholic Church makes the marriage Invalid, Null, illegitimate...you name it.
Is this the case?  Continuing the logic, Salvatore and Daisy H. , in the eyes of the Church, were NOT married. Going further, then there would be  no adultery, just public sin.
You can't trust the secular Media...they have no clue about Church law.

St Leo the Great, pray for us +