Author Topic: Pressure mounts on Vatican and Bishop Williamson (Read 841 times)

Matthew · « **on:** February 04, 2009, 10:18:31 AM »

February 03, 2009

Criticism of Pope Benedict's decision to lift the excommunications of four bishops associated with the Society of St. Pius X-- particularly Bishop Richard Williamson, who denied the extent of the h0Ɩ0cαųst-- has continued. Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, said, "I observe the debate with great concern. There were misunderstandings and management errors in the Curia."

Cardinal Christoph Schonborn of Vienna said, "He who denies the h0Ɩ0cαųst cannot be rehabilitated within the Church." Two German bishops criticized the decision-- one citing a "loss of confidence" in the Pope, the other speaking of "uncertainty, incomprehension, and deception.

Source(s): these links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

* Call for pope to step down over h0Ɩ0cαųst denier (AFP) [Why should he?]
* Anti-Semitic bishop shows we must stay on guard (Kansas City Star) [Who is 'we' and against what should 'we' be on guard?]
* German Jєωs break with pope (International Herald Tribune) [Nobody seems to notice that, eing Jєωs, they were never with the Pope in the first place.]
* Pope's decision is "disastrous", says Dutch bishop (Radio Netherlands) [Why is it disastrous?]
* h0Ɩ0cαųst bishop row has 'undermined trust' in Vatican (Daily Telegraph) [Why?]
* Rochester Diocese Condemns British Bishop for h0Ɩ0cαųst Remarks (WROC-TV) [Well, at least they didnt say 'schismatic' bishop!]
* Vatican/SSPX-- the fallout continues (Reuters)
* The Vatican mishandles a case of historical heresy-- editorial (Cleveland Plain Dealer) [Someone used the 'h' word.]
* Editorial: A h0Ɩ0cαųst denier (Las Vegas Sun) [Whatever that is supposed to mean...]
* Damian Thomspon: After the PR disaster, what does the future hold for Pope Benedict? (Daily Telegraph)

Matthew · « **Reply #1 on:** February 04, 2009, 10:20:04 AM »

The only way I can paste in the links is to use a Word docuмent.

Matthew

Matthew · « **Reply #2 on:** February 04, 2009, 11:36:26 AM »

The h0Ɩ0cαųst DOES matter. It is central to everything in the modern world.

If it didn't matter, the enemies of God wouldn't be so upset about what +W said.
This cuts them to the quick!

Because of the h0Ɩ0cαųst, we have Israel (a country the size of New Jersey) with the 2nd most advanced army in the world (!)
They, in turn, with their powerful Mossad have perpetrated 9/11, which has transformed the USA into a police state.

Because of the "War on terror", the US Dollar has been destroyed, and now families everywhere are struggling to get by.

The truth about the h0Ɩ0cαųst (and 9/11) have VERY PRACTICAL ramifications for everyday people.

It all connects together.

Matthew

Dawn · « **Reply #3 on:** February 04, 2009, 02:34:16 PM »

Since satan apes Christ, the Jєωs have used the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" to replace the only real h0Ɩ0cαųst-Christ on the Cross. Things are bubbling so quickly I think that it is just a matter of time that blood is let. At this time I am re-reading the events leading up to the French Revolution and how in just a matter of days it was out of control.

roscoe · « **Reply #4 on:** February 04, 2009, 08:46:30 PM »

What are you reading?

trad123 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 04, 2009, 09:43:42 PM »

http://www.christorchaos.com/ThoseWhoDenyTheHolocasut.html

Quote

Consider the fact that very word used to describe the crimes of the Third Reich--h0Ɩ0cαųst--is to be used to refer only to the one and only h0Ɩ0cαųst, that which our sins subjected the God-Man, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross. It is an act of blasphemy to use the word "h0Ɩ0cαųst" to anything other than the propitiatory offering that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ made of Himself to the Father in Spirit and in Truth to redeem us by shedding every single drop of His Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross. However, the тαℓмυdic propaganda machine has been quite successful in appropriating the word "h0Ɩ0cαųst" and applying it to the events that transpired under the Third Reich to make of the Jєωs perpetual victims and to give the "Gentiles" a perpetual sense of guilt for what happened during World War II, thereby indemnifying various demands made by тαℓмυdic organizations, whose greatest triumphs were realized during the "Second" Vatican Council.

Elizabeth · « **Reply #6 on:** February 05, 2009, 11:08:29 AM »

Oh my.

Mr. Friedman seems a bit reckless in his rhetoric. The mask is slipping.

What will happen next?

Alex · « **Reply #7 on:** February 06, 2009, 02:39:52 AM »

Quote from: Hristoroquen

After days of silence the Pope and the Vatican issued a statement "firmly rejecting" the views of Williamson and ordering him to publicly recant them in order to stay in the Church.

What does a person's views concerning world history have anything to do with their being a Catholic? One can be excommunicated or denied the right to enter the Church if they reject Church teachings - I have never heard of this happening because a person holds views and opinions on historical events. The pope's authority does not include his right to dictate a person beliefs in this matter.