StevusMagnus, saying what you do, you're a better advertisement for sedevacantism than I could ever be.
Even Spiritus, who has heretofore imbibed your doctrine as sheepishly as possible, sounds like he's fed up.
Have you forgotten, or do you just conveniently leave it out to bolster what passes for your argument, that JPII is quoted as saying "The Old Covenant has never been revoked"? Have you forgotten that he visited ѕуηαgσgυєs and the Wailing Wall? Have you forgotten that he APOLOGIZED for the Church's treatment of Jєωs in the past? ( When in reality, the Church always defended Jєωs against genocide, so what was he apologizing for? Could it be for the dogma that there is no salvation outside the Church? ) Surely you are aware that this man bent over backwards to please the Jєωs, as well as other religions? Not to mention that the VII Magisterium, that shares his Modernist mindset, heretically said that false religions contain the "seeds of the Word."
Now look at Assisis Uno y Dos in this context. Your pettifogging is not going to work here. Everyone can see the way you keep narrowly focusing on Assisi, totally divorced from the rest of JPII's "papacy." They are trying to point out the big picture, which you consistently ignore.
What trad do you know of that defends Assisi? SSPX doesn't defend Assisi. You're out on your own here. I can see that as a lawyer, if I wanted to get my client off, I would take attention off the gory details of his life and I would focus on the evidence proving he didn't do the crime in question. If he was accused of murder, I wouldn't want people focusing on the fact that he has a history of getting into lots of fights in bars, or that he once pulled a knife on his girlfriend. I'd carefully try to arrange things so that these topics got as little airtime as possible.
That's what you're trying to do with Assisi, take attention off JPII's life as a whole and exonerate him based on some kind of technicality for Assisi in particular. I guess you could conceivably do this, at least for Assisi One -- the question is WHY would you want to? Another question is, why does anyone want to rehash this tired shtick.