Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Possible Roman scheme against the SSPX  (Read 17147 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Possible Roman scheme against the SSPX
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2011, 10:50:30 AM »
Quote from: s2srea
My dear Matt- Clearly you have an understanding of theology, which many on this forum lack. But it feels to me as if, sometimes, you might be all too ready to go on a personal attack too, which frustrates the reader who might not even be the one being criticized, who might otherwise be more accepting of your conclusions; add a little tact to your recipe- I'm sure the rest of us simple folk would appreciate it. If we're wrong, please explain why, not insult us 'word abusing, non-understanding carnal minded' friends of yours. Just an observation from a friend.  :smirk:


I'm meant "carnal-minded" in the sense that St. Paul used the term to describe the contentious men of the Church at Corinth.  In many instances, when there is virtually no substance to a statement, when an actual argument is not presented, the problem usually lies with the man himself.  Sure, there are logical fallacies to be addressed, assumptions to be analyzed, but ad hominem is a perfectly legitimate procedure when there is something wrong with the man himself as evinced by his words.  If we fix the spirit of the man first, all else would eventually fade away.        

Possible Roman scheme against the SSPX
« Reply #41 on: September 15, 2011, 11:04:09 AM »
And I do not understand the concern over the subjective intentions of the Pope.  Worrying about whether he is a clever deceiver, in good faith or somewhere in between is immaterial.  The notion that legal recognition amounts to "absorption" into conciliarism is simply a gratuitious statement without foundation.  If you hold that these priests maintain their integrity, resisting errors from within the Church, juridical recognition will not in anyway alter this character of the Society.  We have to look at objective reality and avoid hand-wringing about subjective dispositions.  This only applies to those Catholics who recognize that there is any jurdicial authority left in the Catholic Church.  For those who do not recognize this dogmatic fact, I invite you to analyze the grave implications of such an opinion.  

Our Lord's Body was mutilated, bruised, beaten and in consequence His Most Precious Blood flowed copiously from his wounds, yet not a bone was broken.  The Blood signifies the grace and charity extinguished from the Body of the Church through error and moral corruption, but the integrity of His bones signifies the foundation of legal jurisidiciton, i.e. authority within the mutilated Church, the Mystical Body of Christ.  The moment that His Sacred Heart stopped beating upon His death, signifies the diabolical disorientation of Rome and its infestation with heretics and errant and immoral prelates, at the very heart of the Church.

Look for the resurrection of the Church which will come about from within the Body of the Church, the very thing the sedevacantist denies because their imaginary body lacks a constitutive principle and thus an entirely foreign body must be reconstituted that lacks continuity with the previous Body.        


Possible Roman scheme against the SSPX
« Reply #42 on: September 15, 2011, 12:21:50 PM »
I agree there are many considerations that must take place in analyzing the preamble and setting up a structure whereby the Society can have autonomy. I am certainly not advocating that the Society cave. I think if they can sign the preamble with no doctrinal concessions and ensure a structure where they will have autonomy they should take it.

Otherwise it is important to heed ABL's words from his biography...

Quote
“Ecclesia Dei” Catholics in general think they work more effectively “from inside the Church” than Archbishop Lefebvre who, they say, has placed himself “on the outside”. The Archbishop replied energetically to this objection:

What Church are we talking about? If it is the Conciliar Church it would supposedly have been necessary for us (who fought against her for twenty years and who want the Catholic Church) to re-enter the Conciliar Church to make it, as it were, Catholic. This is a complete illusion. Subjects do not make the superiors; it is the superiors who make the subjects. With all the Roman Curia and in the midst of all the bishops of the world who are progressives, my voice would have been completely drowned out. I would have been incapable of doing anything to protect the faithful and the seminarians. They would have said to us: “Well, we are going to give you this bishop to do the ordinations; your seminarians will have to accept these professors from such and such a diocese.” It is impossible! In the Society of St. Peter they have professors from the diocese of Augsburg. Who are these professors? What do they teach?



Possible Roman scheme against the SSPX
« Reply #44 on: September 15, 2011, 12:42:21 PM »
Quote from: Matthew
I should point out that there ARE different legitimate opinions in this Crisis, even within the SSPX.

Some are more inclined to make a deal with Rome at all costs, thinking that the dropping of the "pariah" status might make for more converts.

Others, perhaps more "big picture" oriented, who see the modern world as a whole and see how the whole package takes men away from true integral Catholicism, believe that we're not going to convert any significant number until there's a chastisement.

Let's put it this way -- right now, ANYONE is welcome to run the gauntlet and join a Traditional Catholic chapel, for purposes of this discussion let's say an SSPX chapel.
They realize they're different, that many don't agree, and that the Powers That Be are very much against them.

Isn't that the attitude that we should all have with the World anyhow -- a prerequisite for properly opposing it? We all have to be willing to stand out, be scorned, be misunderstood, etc. if we want to live an integrally Catholic life in this modern world.

So if the SSPX became approved, you'd remove the prerequisite of "willing to be different" from going to Mass, but NOT from being a good Catholic in the world today. The prerequisite would still hold on the World side of things.

There are only so many people who are that strong.

Maybe this is why Indult Catholics are often very worldly and seldom "integral" in their practice of Catholicism? "Willingness to stand up against opposition" is not required for membership there, so statistically you'll only have a couple members at the Church who HAPPEN to be willing to thus stand out.

But at an SSPX chapel, they ALL have to be willing to stand out, be criticized unjustly, etc.

Now even if Rome "converted" tomorrow and every local Catholic Church became as authentically Catholic as an SSPX chapel -- would we have any more serious Catholics? Sure, we'd have some -- whoever in the Novus Ordo is opposing the world and living a Catholic life to rival any traditional Catholic today. But how many of those are there, REALLY?

We'd all STILL have to oppose the world, and let's not forget that the SSPX (whose position is true Catholicism) preaches a very HARD religion -- one that most men reject due to malice and/or weakness.

Perhaps the World would know the jig is up and start persecuting Catholics if the Catholic Church turned into a super-sized SSPX. That's why I say a chastisement is ultimately necessary. The world is just TOO far gone at this point.


Wow!  Matthew!  That was a great post.  :applause:
 I totally agree that Catholics will not unite or move forward until after the chastisement.  Those  faithful Catholics, small in number, who have endured so many hardships for the faith, will be priviledged to witness the anting when our tests come.   Please note the boxed quote I found in her message.  LaSalette gives us Catholics everything we need to know about today and the future.  
Let us take every opportunity that God gives us to suffer.  Contradictions are a very acute form of suffering.  We have the faith amoung billions in the world without it.  The thin line  of  true priests priests and bishops  in the world bring us the sacraments.  Lets pray for their perserverence

Here are a couple of quotes pertinent to this discussion  from the LaSalette Secret b]


Quote
The true faith to the Lord having been forgotten, each individual will want to be on his own and be superior to people of same identity, they will abolish civil rights as well as ecclesiastical, all order and all justice would be trampled underfoot and only homicides, hate, jealousy, lies and dissension would be seen without love for country or family.
[/b][/color]


Quote
I make an urgent appeal to the earth. I call on the true disciples of the living God who reigns in Heaven; I call on the true followers of Christ made man, the only true Saviour of men; I call on my children, the true faithful, those who have given themselves to me so that I may lead them to my divine Son, those whom I carry in my arms, so to speak, those who have lived on my spirit. Finally, I call on the Apostles of the Last Days, the faithful disciples of Jesus Christ who have lived in scorn for the world and for them selves, in poverty and in humility, in scorn and in silence, in prayer and in mortification, in chastity and in union with God, in suffering and unknown to the world. It is time they came out and filled the world with light. Go and reveal yourselves to be my cherished children. I am at your side and within you, provided that your faith is the light which shines upon you in these unhappy days. May your zeal make you famished for the glory and the honour of Jesus Christ. Fight, children of light, you, the few who can see. For now is the time of all times, the end of all ends.
[/b][/color]