Anyone else wondering why this great pope is not a saint?

I remember reading a story that padre pio was celebrating mass one day and saw him in heaven - how beautiful

Please join me in a novena for him to be recognised by the church as a saint

O Venerable Pope Pius XII, who had on earth great courage to preach the word of God, vigor to repel the enemies of the Church, and zeal for the Holy Name, pray for us poor sinners. May we, O Pius, have a double portion of thy righteous qualities in defense of our holy Church. May we never abandon our duty to defend the faith, with fortitude, wherever we are and in whatever state God hath put us. Venerable Pius, may we, like thee, show the radiant glory of our Holy Lord in everything we do and say. And this, through the graciousness of the Divine Majesty, to Whom we humbly ask thee to pray for our benefit and protection. 
Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Anyone else wondering why this great pope is not a saint?

Are you kidding?

He appointed the vast majority of the modernist bishops who later brought us Vatican II.  He opened the door for evolution.  He opened the door for Catholic birth control.  He allowed the attack on the EENS dogma.  He launched the illustrious career of one Annibale Bugnini and empowered him to mess around with the liturgy.  If there's any Pope who was THE watershed into Vatican II, it was Pius XII.  Pius XII was one of the weakest popes in the history of popes.

Why is Leo XIII not a saint?

Are you forgetting about St. John Paul II the Great?

John Paul II, John XXIII and soon to be Paul VI are all saints of the counterfeit church of Vatican II

John Paul II, John XXIII and soon to be Paul VI are all saints of the counterfeit church of Vatican II

I was just yanking your chain, which is why I mentioned the Ungreat.

If Pope Pius XII were to be canonized today, I would doubt the authenticity of such canonization.

As a matter of fact, I have arrived to the conclusion that every single canonization coming from the saint-factory following Vatican II, is doubtful, at best, including the suspicious declarations of female "Doctors" of the Church.

I would agree with you. Everything they do is tainted by fulfilling modern agendas.

I've noticed on sedeplenist Traditional Catholic channels that the imminent canonisation of Paul VI is starting to cause doubts about Francis' Papacy. Canonisations are infallible after all, and it's hard to fathom how Paul VI could be a Saint.

No they aren't ( especially when the standards have been wittled  down to almost nothin )

No they aren't ( especially when the standards have been wittled  down to almost nothin )

Yes they are. You can't pick and choose your Saints. If the Church makes someone a Saint then they're a Saint and we know for certain they're in Heaven.

The 1967 New Catholic Encyclopedia: "The dogma that saints are to be venerated and invoked as set forth in the profession of faith of Trent (cf. Denz. 1867) has as its correlative the power to canonize. ... "

St. Thomas Aquinas:, 'Honor we show the saints is a certain profession of faith by which we believe in their glory, and it is to be piously believed that even in this the judgment of the Church is not able to err' (Quodl. 9:8:16).