It seems to me that it is an unsettled issue. Thus a priest or bishop in good conscience can fall on either side.
As for lay people, we can rely on the advice of our confessor. If he is wrong, we will not be held guilty for the sin.
On the other hand, if the clergy is wrong, they may end up being judged for their error. Thus, I would argue, we should strengthen our Bishops and Priests, since the carry a far heavier burden than we do.
There, respectfully, I must disagree. There is nothing unsettled about the licitness of marital continence, though there is admittedly little concerning which reasons are grave enough to employ its use. All that I have seen regarding the practice establishes that it is, when used with grave reason, morally neutral, insofar as it retards the fecundity of marriage which, despite the claptrap of the conciliar establishment, is its primary motivation, albeit using the woman's natural cyclical infertility.
Of course, and this is my own interpretation nor I do not put it forth as definitive, it seems to me that, morally, the gravity must be such that not using it would result in a greater harm. Perhaps in those cases where a woman, though fertile, lacks the reproductive health by which she could reasonably be assured that she could nuture and carry a child to term. In such a case, where presumably numerous souls would be, with no baptism, consigned to eternity deprived of Beatific Vision, such a thing would acceptable, though not a moral good. It could further be argued that, for the purposes of temperance and in search of a greater good, those couples which cannot successfully utilize the fecundity of their marriage might hope for the grace to live and share a chaste union.
And I agree that we must strengthen the teachers of the Church, but we must also, and always in a calm, reasonable manner, correct them in those situations where they might deviate from the faith, as St. Paul did to the Prince of the Apostles. It is incuмbent on those teachers, who operate without mandate or jurisdiction, nor means of correction from their superiors, to bear criticism of their flocks with a just and humble heart, knowing that their training is limited and their assurances of correction are few.