Scalfari’s fifth meeting with Pope Francis, it is not the first time he has misrepresented the Pope’s words following a private audience.
In November 2013, following intense controversy over quotes the journalist had attributed to Francis, Scalfari admitted that at least some of the words he had published a month prior “were not shared by the Pope himself.”

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/vatican-dont-trust-report-that-pope-francis-denied-reality-of-hell-53450

If this journalist admits that what he said was not what Pope Francis actually said tehn why believe anything else that he says? This would not be the first time that a journalist lied about what somebody else said. something untrue about what somebody said. You only believe the worse because you have bad will against Pope Francis.  

Uhm, this particular quote does not come from Scalfari ... but from Juan Carlos Cruz, a sex abuse victim.  There's no reason to doubt his credibility.

Nice try, poche.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/21/europe/pope-francis-gαy-comments-intl/index.html

Ontologically, the hermaphrodite still has either an exclusive masculine (male) or feminine (female) soul, despite the physical birth defect. The soul created by God has no ambiguity in its nature & identity. Hermaphroditism is no different than being born with no limbs or any other grotesque disfiguration, but it's no reflection of the soul of the person.

The parents & priest of the hermaphrodite must pray, fast and give alms for the child in his formative years so the child, parents & priest may finally discern the actual sex of the person according to his soul, and proceed to corrective physical surgery. This is not the same as the mortal sin of the grotesque perversion of "transitioning".

And don't tell me souls have no masculine (male) or feminine (female) nature. St. Michael the Archangel is named "Michael" because of his masculine (male) soul, despite not having a physical body.

It is very evil, in fact blasphemy, to tell someone that God loves their evil behavior and/or created that person for the purpose of doing the evil that they are doing.

Sodomy is one of The Four Sins.

And it could be argued the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ must do the same.

Yes, prayer, fasting and giving alms are definitely to be recommended

Perhaps ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity could be cured if the liberal agenda didn't shut down any attempts at it.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is "cured" irrespective of any liberal agenda, when ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ persons devote their lives to Christ, through the practice of the sacraments and other aids offered by the Church, just as for any other sin, though ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ feelings do take great effort, determination and persistence to overcome.

Based on the facts that we see ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity in animals and the fact ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs have been found to exhibit certain brain functions more akin to the opposite sex, I'd reckon it's a mental disorder rather than purely a spiritual one (although it may have such causes in humans - yet surely not animals, and of course dire spiritual consequences should they act on the urges).

Repeating the same actions over and over causes the "wiring" in the brain to change. It's what we laymen call habits. Habits can be good and bad. We want to keep our good habits (virtues), but as we all know, bad habits (sins) are rooted deeply in us. 

An insanely disproportionate number of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs suffered sɛҳuąƖ abuse as children, suggesting it's some sort of post-traumatic disorder. So it should be treated like a mental disorder rather than just accepted as an orientation(what nonsense!). And while it may not have such a simple cure as surgery, I'm sure through therapy and prayer it could be cured if only the research of cures weren't actively prevented in modern society.

ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity was classified as a mental disorder until 1973 when the American Psychiatric Association voted to remove it from their conditions for treatment.

For the spiritual approach see https://couragerc.org/ 

For the therapeutic approach see The National Association for Research & Therapy of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity (NARTH), which by my brief attempt to find their website brought up many attacks against them, which could be a good reason to investigate what they have to offer. The founder was Joseph Nicolosi:  https://www.josephnicolosi.com/

It means that even though this person has certain type of temptations against the virtue of chastity God still loves this person with such a special love that He gave His only son that he might join Him in paradise.
  https://www.catholic.org/saints/fun_facts_arch.php?saint=10

It is very evil, in fact blasphemy, to tell someone that God loves their evil behavior and/or created that person for the purpose of doing the evil that they are doing.

Sodomy is one of The Four Sins.