Well, often in the practical order, it does resolve itself this way. Sometimes the more "doctrinaire" one becomes, the less compassionate he becomes. Certainly there's no objective contradiction, and the more one embraces true doctrine the more compassionate he becomes. But it's easy to fall into the trap of bitter zeal. Why do we uphold doctrine? Because our fraternal charity seeks to bring others to the truth. Sometimes however we can have a tendency to promote doctrine in the abstract only ... as if doctrine in the abstract even needs defending. Truth is truth on its own and it needs no defending; defending it does not make it more true, nor does a failure to defend it make it less true in and of itself. When we defend truth, it must be motivated from paternal charity. If for one and not one of those people who think that everything Francis says is wrong or evil. It seems that he could defend the dogma of the Holy Trinity and immediately would get attacked by Traditionalists for it. I for one am tired of constantly attacking. I give him credit where credit is do, and I pray for him. When he says something wrong, then I will indeed criticize that, but again only if it seems that the criticism would serve a purpose in terms of helping steer someone away from his errors.