Author Topic: Pope Francis said  (Read 4122 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline poche

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14893
  • Reputation: +686/-2515
  • Gender: Male
Re: Pope Francis said
« Reply #60 on: August 17, 2019, 01:17:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!4
  • Any political action or legislative initiative aimed at “b re a c h i n g ” the inviolability of the sacramental seal would constitute an unacceptable offense against libertas Ecclesiae, which does not receive its legitimacy from individual States, but from God; it would also constitute a violation of religious freedom, legally fundamental to all other freedoms, including the
    freedom of conscience of individual citizens, both penitents and confessors. Breaking the seal would be tantamount to violating the wretched man within the sinner.



    http://www.osservatoreromano.va/vaticanresources/pdf/ING_2019_033_1608.pdf



    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 14893
    • Reputation: +686/-2515
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #61 on: August 20, 2019, 12:33:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • Pope Francis said Sunday that prayer in adoration of God and service to others spreads the fire of God’s love, changing the world one heart at a time.
    “I invite everyone to discover the beauty of the prayer of adoration and to exercise it often,” Pope Francis said Aug. 18.
    Adoration of God in prayer is necessary to allow the fire of love that Jesus brought to the earth to envelop our entire existence, the pope explained.

    https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-discover-the-beauty-of-prayer-in-adoration-72637


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7442
    • Reputation: +2094/-262
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #62 on: August 21, 2019, 04:57:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That is really weird and modern Church & Crucifix.   Very scary.  


    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)

    Offline Simple

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 6
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #63 on: August 21, 2019, 05:12:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Anytime that affemient front man is named I think about how these creeps will be punished for their evils.   A" high-profile prison homicide was that of former priest John Geoghan, who was strangled and stomped to death by another inmate in a Massachusetts facility in 2003."
    Yes we're watching.

    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 14893
    • Reputation: +686/-2515
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #64 on: August 22, 2019, 12:58:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!4
  • Anytime that affemient front man is named I think about how these creeps will be punished for their evils.   A" high-profile prison homicide was that of former priest John Geoghan, who was strangled and stomped to death by another inmate in a Massachusetts facility in 2003."
    Yes we're watching.
    I understand that his legal case was still on appeal at the time of his murder. Because of that, the murder caused him to die legally an innocent man, technically according to the law. 


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 14893
    • Reputation: +686/-2515
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #65 on: September 14, 2019, 12:04:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Fidelity to tradition ensures a fruitful future, Pope Francis said in a meeting Thursday with a contemplative-missionary community rooted in the spirituality of St. Augustine.
    “To be modern, some believe that it is necessary to break away from the roots. And this is their ruin, because the roots, the tradition, are the guarantee of the future,” Pope Francis said Sept. 12.

    https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope-francis-tradition-is-the-guarantee-of-the-future-11255

    Offline Mark 79

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 992
    • Reputation: +970/-92
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #66 on: September 14, 2019, 07:31:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7442
    • Reputation: +2094/-262
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #67 on: September 14, 2019, 10:25:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Douay-Rheims Bible
    But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema  Galatians 1:8.
    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)


    Offline poche

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 14893
    • Reputation: +686/-2515
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #68 on: September 15, 2019, 03:14:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pope Francis said that Catholic Tradition is the guarantee of the future.   

    Offline Mark 79

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 992
    • Reputation: +970/-92
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #69 on: September 15, 2019, 03:49:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • talmudic scum­

     
    “As regular readers of [Call Me Jorge] know, Francis is into all things Judaic, especially Chasidism.  Their doctrines creep out here and there in Francis’ sermons and documents.  One of the things which Francis does with regularity is to invert the teachings of the Church.  An example of this is the use of the term ‘pharisee’ which he applies to his enemies, who are not open to Talmudic Judaism and Francis’ anti-Catholic machinations.  Another example is his favorite blasphemous painting, White Crucifixion.  Francis shows his hand, when he inverts Catholic doctrine, as a modernist change agent who is simply following the dictates of ‘The Rebbe’ to be, “modern on the outside and Chabad on the inside.” One of the most blatant examples is Francis teaching the Talmudic formula: Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah (“descent for sake of ascent”).  This teaching simply means that one has to descend into sin, which paradoxically has a positive status in Hasidism, in order to ascend to new heights.  This is done because the god of Talmudic Judaism is one of opposites — a hermaphrodite god of good/evil.  In the Hasidic lore, tzaddiks (saints or righteous people) wrestle not with evil but with goodness as they descend into sin in this process in order to ascend into righteousness.  Yeridah Tzorech Aliyah is one of the foundational beliefs of Orthodox Talmudic Judaism along with Tikkun Olam.  In the later belief the rabbis have the chutzpah to state that God made creation imperfect and the Talmudic Jews are to correct his work.
     
    “The Hasidism of Francis’ mind is also shown when he says such things as, “[Jesus] made himself the devil” and “the Holy Trinity [is] arguing behind closed doors but on the outside they give the picture of unity.”  Who else sees Jesus as a devil or God as a bunch of arguing rabbis other than a Talmudist?  Whether he is parroting the ideas of HeschelLevinasBuberWiesela dead rebbe from the Steppes, or having over rabbis as guests who often gift him with books (Gluck & Steinsaltz) there’s an excellent chance it’s comes from the Baal Shem Tov and his cult in one manner or another.
     
    “In the video clip below the late Chabad Lubavitcher rabbi, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, explains why Hasids should descend (into sin) in order to ascend — they are hunters getting ready to kill their prey.  Another late Chasidic rabbi, Abraham Heschel (of Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate), in a 1965 interview with Ma'ariv explained exactly whom the prey were, “There are those who would like to attack [Christians’] bodies. I want to attack their souls.”  The elevation which takes place is one which will incorporate the prey’s soul into the of cult Talmudic Judaism and worship of their demonic hermaphrodite god.   It’s a total inversion of Catholicism, the religion instituted by Jesus the Christ.  So why is Francis teaching it?”
     
    the Rebbe explains the Hasidic stratagem of “descent for sake of ascent”
    https://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rebbe-explains-hasidic-stratagem-of.html

    Offline Mark 79

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 992
    • Reputation: +970/-92
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #70 on: September 15, 2019, 03:51:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bomb
    Socci: "That devil of Jesus", word of Pope Bergoglio
    7 April 2017




    In the Church many have their hands in their hair, because things that have never been seen are happening. There have been popes of all kinds in two thousand years, but a pope had never happened in the church who, in the homily of the Mass, utters phrases that - in the mouth of anyone else - would be considered blasphemy. The otherriers, for example, pope Bergoglio, in Santa Marta, came up with an expression that must have frozen the listeners (even if then nobody has the courage to say anything).

    Commenting - in a totally absurd way - on the biblical passage of the serpent raised by Moses in the desert (Numbers 21, 4-9), he affirmed that Jesus "became sin, made himself a devil, a serpent for us". Textual. But how can we say that Jesus "became a devil"?

    Jesus, for Christian doctrine, took upon himself the sins of all, paying for everyone as a sacrificial lamb without blemish, so that St. Paul writes: "He who had not known sin, God treated him as sin in our favor, because we we could become God's righteousness through him "(2 Cor 5:21).

    But to say that Jesus "became a devil" is something completely different (with a gnostic flavor). The Son of God became man to redeem men, he did not become a devil to redeem the devils, who, I remember, are totally connoted by the inextinguishable hatred of God (it is unimaginable for a Pope to say such a thing about Jesus).

    Lost - There is now a long series of sortie of this kind with which Bergoglio has long bombed the poor flock of increasingly disconcerted and bewildered Christians. To Eugenio Scalfari he declared that "there is no Catholic God". On 16 June 2016, opening the Conference of the Diocese of Rome, in the Basilica of San Giovanni in Laterano, he came out stating that Jesus, in the episode of the adulteress, "is a bit of a fool". Then he added that Jesus - always in the episode in which he saved the woman from stoning - "has failed towards morality" (this text too). Finally, even that Jesus was not "clean" (it is not known that he meant).

    Add to this the "magisterium of gestures", such as the fact that in greeting the faithful he never makes with the hand the sign of the cross, or his obstinate refusal to kneel before the tabernacle and before Jesus the Eucharist (while he kneels in a whole series of other occasions in which there is no Eucharist).

    Various other shots could be added, above all on questions concerning morals, for example always in Scalfari he said that «each of us has his own vision of the Good and also of the Evil. We must incite him to proceed towards what he thinks is Good "(a perfect manifesto of relativism, the end of Catholicism).

    But what is most striking is the progressiveness of the increasingly unheard-of statements about Jesus, culminating in the sentence of the day before yesterday ("he became a devil"). What explanations can be found? The first that comes to mind is theological ignorance. True, Pope Bergoglio is not culturally equipped and is one of the few people who came to the cardinalate and then to the papacy without a doctorate in theology. But above all, if one is so unprepared in theology and so imprudent as to make declarations on the verge of blasphemy, it is good that he does not hold the highest office (even doctrinal) of the Church because it would be like putting a boy, who does not even know how to drive a car , to pilot a Boeing. Or at least it is good that you do not speak in arm.

    Secondly, the lack of theological qualifications does not explain such disconcerting statements, because one can take any parish priest of Christianity who has only done the seminary (without other titles), and certainly will never say such things. Not even one who simply attended the Catechism. The fact is that Bergoglio literally theorized "incomplete thought". And those who continue to have a solid thought are disqualified as doctrinaire, fundamentalist and rigorous. He declared this in an interview with Father Spadaro criticizing the past learned of the Jesuits: "epochs (in which) in the company" he said "a closed, rigid, more instructive-ascetic than mystical thought was lived". Then in Evangelii Gaudium he took it upon "those who dream of a monolithic doctrine defended by all without nuances" (n. 40). And finally he wrote: "Sometimes, listening to a completely orthodox language, what the faithful receive, because of the language they use and understand, is something that does not correspond to the true Gospel of Jesus Christ" (n. 41).

    Today we have the first pope who - instead of being the Custodian of doctrinal orthodoxy - criticizes the "completely orthodox language". According to some, he does it to justify the goodies he says and wants to continue to spread. But this stubborn will, which has been constant for four years now, suggests that there is a systematic decision to deconstruct Catholic doctrine or at least subject it to such delegitimization as to make the idea pass, in the Christian people, that everyone can say, think and believe what he wants. It is the empire of relativism. Indeed a Barnum Circus. But, perhaps, to fully understand what is happening, it is good to remember the "dramatic struggle" in the Church, of which he spoke, a year ago, at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Msgr. Georg Gaenswein, secretary of Benedict XVI, about the 2005 Conclave, which led to the election of card. Ratzinger, to whom the then card was opposed Bergoglio, supported by progressives.

    Clash - Gaenswein evoked precisely the Conclave of April 2005 "from which Joseph Ratzinger, after one of the shortest elections in the history of the Church, came out elected after only four ballots following a dramatic struggle between the so-called" Salt Party of the Earth " (Salt of Earth Party) around cardinals López Trujíllo, Ruini, Herranz, Rouco Varela or Medina and the so-called St. Gall Group around cardinals Danneels, Martini, Silvestrini or Murphy-O 'Connor () The election was certainly the result also of a clash, the key of which had almost provided Ratzinger himself as cardinal dean, in the historic homily of 18 April 2005 in St. Peter's; and precisely there where "a dictatorship of relativism that recognizes nothing as definitive and leaves only its own ego and desires as its last measure" had contrasted another measure: "the Son of God and true man" like "the measure of true humanism "". Gaenswein then added that at present the mentality that Benedict XVI had opposed is prevailing and "the" dictatorship of relativism "has long been expressed in an overwhelming way through the many channels of new media that could barely be imagined in 2005" . Words that make us understand what drama is going on inside the Church today. One of the greatest living Catholic philosophers, Robert Spaemann, a personal friend of Benedict XVI, thundered some time ago on Die Tagespost with an article with an eloquent title: "Even in the Church there is a limit to tolerability".

    Another important Catholic philosopher, Josef Seifert, a collaborator of John Paul II and Benedict XVI, intervened with very harsh criticism, which motivated him thus: «the Pope is not infallible if he does not speak ex cathedra. Various Popes (like Formosus and Honorius I) were condemned for heresy. And it is our holy duty - out of love and mercy towards so many souls - to criticize our bishops and even our dear Pope, if they deviate from the truth and if their mistakes damage the Church and souls ». Such an explosive situation in the Church had never been seen.

      Antonio Socci


    Offline Mark 79

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 992
    • Reputation: +970/-92
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #71 on: September 15, 2019, 03:54:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0




  • dishonorable mention
    Francis and the Shekinah

    another dishonorable mention for the destroyer
    "subsisting in" the Chair of Peter
    Francis favorite 1938 modernist painting, “White Crucifixion” by the Byelorussian Jewish painter Moishe Zakharovich Shagal (“Marc Chagall”), not only depicts Jesus as a Chassidic Jew but also contains the common Jewish insult on the Holy Name of Jesus. The Hebrew use of “Yeshu” (ישו) in Chagall’s blasphemy is a Jewish mockery of Jesus’ actual Hebrew name “Yeschua” (ישוע). Yeshu is a Hebrew acronym for
    “May his name and memory be blotted out.”


    Some “Pope”!


    Detail from the “Pope’s” favorite painting:


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7442
    • Reputation: +2094/-262
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #72 on: September 15, 2019, 08:31:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Jews equal communism.  Pope is a communist. Many in Rome won’t even say the Holy Name Jesus.  

    There should be the same protests at Rome like the ones we did outside our evil dioceses and parishes.  These evil people should be run out of there.  Many of these parishes are just elaborate theatre productions.  

    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)

    Offline Mark 79

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 992
    • Reputation: +970/-92
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #73 on: September 15, 2019, 05:36:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Jews equal communism.  Pope is a communist. Many in Rome won’t even say the Holy Name Jesus.  

    There should be the same protests at Rome like the ones we did outside our evil dioceses and parishes.  These evil people should be run out of there.  Many of these parishes are just elaborate theatre productions.  
    Ashamed of the Cross
     
    Another sad day for Catholics
     
     
    [/font][/size][/color]
     
     
    It is a habit with him.
     
     
    “For he that shall be ashamed of me, and of my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation: the Son of man also will be ashamed of him, when he shall come in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.”
     
    “For he that shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him the Son of man shall be ashamed, when he shall come in his majesty, and that of his Father, and of the holy angels.”
     
     

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7442
    • Reputation: +2094/-262
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Pope Francis said
    « Reply #74 on: September 15, 2019, 08:35:58 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • And yet he won’t make an effort to genuflect when in the presence of our Lord in the tabernacle.  
    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16