Pope Francis just promulgated a decree that rejects gender ideology.
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2019-06/vatican-docuмent-on-gender-yes-to-dialogue-no-to-ideology.html
As usual Francis shows everything he touches comes out heresy:
ROME, June 14, 2019 (
LifeSiteNews) — A Catholic psychologist has denounced the latest Vatican docuмent on gender theory as containing “not one sentence of sound advice for parents who try to educate their children towards the virtues necessary for a Christian life.”
In a searing critique, Dr. Gerard J.M. van den Aardweg, a Dutch psychologist and psychoanalyst specializing in the treatment of persons with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ tendencies, condemned the recent Vatican docuмent on gender theory, saying “the aggressive neo-pagan sɛҳuąƖ ideology of the world has no wisdom we might share. The task of the Church is not dialoguing but teaching and correcting, there is a relentless spiritual war going on in the field of sɛҳuąƖity, marriage, and the family.”
LifeSite: Dr. van den Aardweg, what are your general impressions of the Vatican’s new docuмent on gender theory?Dr. van den Aardweg: Basically, it is an ideological docuмent. It is not specifically Catholic, in spite of some lip service. It essentially makes a plea for a kind of atheist-humanist/socialist sex education, presented as more or less Catholic. It gushes over the boons of a social model of sɛҳuąƖ education monitored by “professional experts” on the basis of naively supposed ever-deepening insights into sɛҳuąƖity in the current human sciences. It represents the kind of illusionary and sentimental talk about education and “affectivity” characteristic of the immature and superficial humanistic psychology of the 1960s, but now proclaimed as ‘higher wisdom’ by a Vatican Congregation whose members run half a century behind the times. It is ‘dialogue’ and ‘listening’ and ‘openness’ all over again. But no listening to the divine teachings of the Catholic Church on sɛҳuąƖity, marriage and the family (for these seem in need of ‘restructuring’). Teaching and preaching them to a pagan world is not, it seems, the way forward. The great dream is an “alliance” with the neo-paganism of the sɛҳuąƖ, marriage, and family ideology of the UN and the anti-Christian EU countries.
“Listening.” Well, listening attentively to the docuмent’s vague and ambiguous formulations and suggestions in order to discern what it drives at, one can discern its lead motive: revolutionary change.