Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9

Author Topic: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary  (Read 3321 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Caminus

Re: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2026, 05:08:09 PM »
Just because you keep bloviating nonsensical and unproven phrases means nothing.
Logged

Online Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2026, 05:10:01 PM »
Quote from: Caminus on February 14, 2026, 05:08:09 PM
Just because you keep bloviating nonsensical and unproven phrases means nothing.

Get lost.  You have no earthly idea what you're talking about.
Logged

Offline Caminus

Re: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2026, 09:42:56 PM »
First, I hope you realize that writing that way towards your neighbor is morally equivalent to speaking that way in person.  I surely hope you are not that rude in person.  Second, merely hand-waving, insulting me and saying I don't know what I'm talking about is equivalent to conceding the argument.  
Logged

Offline Lazarus

Re: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary
« Reply #23 on: February 15, 2026, 11:33:08 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on February 14, 2026, 05:06:15 PM
No, you clearly have no idea what you're talking about, and didn't even read the Tuchonian docuмent.  Both the pre-Vatican-II theologians and Tucho/Prevost say that the term is confusing and can easily be misunderstood, and requires explanation.  Nothing "goes much deeper" or "undermines Catholic doctrine regarding Mary's role in our salvation".

Just because you keep bloviating nonsensical and unproven phrases means nothing.  I've tread the pre-V2 theologians and Tucho's docuмent.  You're just spewing nonsense.

Only difference is that one might rightly suspect their motivations as being other than what they stated, i.e. to avoid confusion, since they've never cared about that before.  But on the surface, what they say is absolutely the same thing pre-V2 theologians hold.

You clearly have no idea what Mary's role in salvation even is but are just virtue signalling and garment rending.
You seem to believe Vatican II happened instantly and that all pre-Vatican II docuмents can be trusted. That is not the case, Vatican II happened when modernists became the majority, by no means did modernists not exist before Vatican II.

Logged

Offline Lazarus

Re: Pope(?) Leo Doubles Down on Rejecting Co-Redemptrix Title for Mary
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2026, 11:34:56 AM »
Quote from: WorldsAway on February 12, 2026, 12:28:02 PM
Hey Freind

Your reading comprehension could use some work

..or maybe you should just run the post that you're replying to through your AI to get a summary intended for someone with an intellect such as yours


:laugh2: :popcorn: :laugh2:
Ok, I hope you confess what you did today to the priest. People like you should't be on social media to be a source of scandal and to damn themselves. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 9
« previous next »