Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: Johannes on January 24, 2025, 09:11:57 AM

Title: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Johannes on January 24, 2025, 09:11:57 AM
Can the N.O. clergy "belong" to a false religion while "adhering" to the Catholic Faith without knowing it :confused:
We need to separate the various questions to gain more clarity (so for this poll put the whole doubtful/invalid Holy Orders debate out of your mind).

Some have pointed out that a "distinction" should be made between the definition "belong" and "adhere" and that these two terms should not be conflated.

Hopefully this will suffice:

Belong = You identify with the Novus Ordo believing that it is the Catholic Church without fully realizing that it is a false church.

Adhere = You identify with the Novus Ordo fully realizing that it is NOT the Catholic Church, and you choose to adhere to it anyway.

 With the above distinctions in mind, let us review what these other polls demonstrate according to voters:

A) The Novus Ordo "church" is NOT the Catholic Church (80% say it is not)

(https://i.imgur.com/shJmls5.jpeg)

B) Those who belong to the Novus Ordo are NOT members of the Catholic Church (90% )

(https://i.imgur.com/gUXlpd8.jpeg)

In summary, these polls ^^^ demonstrate that the majority of voters think that the N.O. is NOT the Catholic Church but a false religion, or sect (80%), and as a Catholic you cannot belong/adhere (depending on how you view that distinction) to any other religion/sect and still be considered a Catholic (90%).

A few considerations:

(https://i.imgur.com/j7oWkCa.jpeg)
(https://i.imgur.com/hg74JkV.jpeg)

Some theologians teach:

In brief (and I am paraphrasing), that mystically the Church has a body and a soul.

1) There are those who belong to both the visible body and the soul by profession of the true faith, partaking of the same sacraments, etc. and who live the life of grace.

2) Then there are those who belong only to the body but not the soul, such as reprobates, hardened sinners, etc. who are part of the visible Church, but invisibly they have cut themselves off from the soul due to their mortal sins.

3) Lastly there are those such as catechumens and excommunicates who may belong to the soul of the Church (through faith and charity) but not the body (visible Church). They profess the true faith, but due to their status cannot participate in the sacraments.

So, for this poll, some important considerations include the following line of logic/questioning:

- The Novus Ordo is a false religion/sect.

- Catholics cannot both be members of the true Church and belong to a false religion/sect.

HOW THEN can the N.O. clergy be considered Catholic?
IS it possible for them to hold offices, while NOT belonging to the body, if somehow some of them have still retained membership with the soul/invisible part of the Church?
AND THEN, how would you even know who these supposedly secret/invisible soul member clergy were?

AND LASTLY - DON"T FORGET that all the N.O. clergy explicitly accept/teach Vatican II,
which according to this poll taught heresies or worse:
(https://i.imgur.com/VMjl7ls.jpeg)

In Conclusion, 
Does God expect us to believe:
that these explicitly affirming/accepting Vatican II heretics, 
who belong to a false religion, 
but may also at the same time adhere to the Catholic Church invisibly (because the N.O. is NOT the Catholic Church therefore they do not belong to the visible Catholic Church) 
can somehow belong to the soul of the Church (even while still retaining their heresies) 
and that they are still retaining their offices 
and exercise legitimate authority over true Catholics?

Related Polls:

Poll: Can one belong to another religion and still be Catholic?

 (https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/poll-can-one-belong-to-another-faithreligion-and-still-be-catholic/)Poll: What did V2 teach?

 (https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/poll-what-did-vatican-ii-teach/)Poll: Are heretics members of the Catholic Church? (https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/poll-are-heretics-members-of-the-catholic-church/)


Poll: What is the N.O. church? (https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/what-is-the-'novus-ordo-church'/)




Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Ladislaus on January 24, 2025, 09:44:09 AM
So, once again I can't vote ...
Quote
Yes, they belong to the N.O. & adhere to the Catholic Church & they do hold office.

I believe that they CAN belong to the NO, adhere to the Catholic Church, and hold office, but most probably do not, since they are manifest heretics.

So, in the case of a non-(pertinacious formal manifest) heretic [agreeing with your definition of those who merely "belong" to it] with valid Holy Orders (at least for some episcopal functions), e.g. as in the Eastern Rites, I believe that can and do hold office, either by the principles of sedeprivationism or else the "color of title" principle that some SVs have cited from theologians, where those in lower office can still receive jurisdiction from even an Antipope due to "color of title".

I believe that few meet these criteria, most notably some Eastern Rite bishops.  There are a few Roman Rite ones who are not pertinacious heretics, but they have dubious orders, and therefore can do little more than make appointments and serve as a conduit for the jurisdiction priests require to confect the Sacraments.
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Ladislaus on January 24, 2025, 09:46:21 AM
Adhere = You identify with the Novus Ordo fully realizing that it is NOT the Catholic Church, and you choose to adhere to it anyway.

I believe you can ADHERE to the Novus Ordo in the sense of pertinaciously embracing the various V2 heresies and errors, even if on don't explicitly think, "Ah, this is not the Catholic Church."  Modernists, for instance, do believe it's the "Catholic Church", but they believe in a Church that can change as it did at Vatican II.  So I think this definition requires a bit more nuance and distinction.
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Ladislaus on January 24, 2025, 09:50:33 AM
You just vote "other" and you have explained yourself.

Yeah, it's just that my opinion is so close to the first, and the suggestion is to change the answer to where NO hierarchs CAN hold office/jurisdiction in the Church, rather than make it an all-or-nothing "do or do not".
(https://therestaurantboss.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Quote-Image-2016-09-06.jpg)
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: WhiteWorkinClassScapegoat on January 24, 2025, 10:01:14 AM
So, once again I can't vote ...
I believe that they CAN belong to the NO, adhere to the Catholic Church, and hold office, but most probably do not, since they are manifest heretics.

So, in the case of a non-(pertinacious formal manifest) heretic [agreeing with your definition of those who merely "belong" to it] with valid Holy Orders (at least for some episcopal functions), e.g. as in the Eastern Rites, I believe that can and do hold office, either by the principles of sedeprivationism or else the "color of title" principle that some SVs have cited from theologians, where those in lower office can still receive jurisdiction from even an Antipope due to "color of title".

I believe that few meet these criteria, most notably some Eastern Rite bishops.  There are a few Roman Rite ones who are not pertinacious heretics, but they have dubious orders, and therefore can do little more than make appointments and serve as a conduit for the jurisdiction priests require to confect the Sacraments.
So, in a nutshell, you're basically saying I can go to the nearest Novus Ordo chapel for confession and be validly absolved of my sins as long as the priest is not a manifest heretic? 
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Ladislaus on January 24, 2025, 10:03:05 AM
How does that make anyone in the N.O. different from a Prot who thinks he is in the true Church?

Catholics who are not pertinacious heretics have the formal motive of faith, where they base their faith on the authority of the teaching Church, the Magisterium.  Protestants do not.  It has nothing to do with subjective sincerity.

Formal Motive refers not to WHAT I believe but WHY I believe it.

If I have the right WHY, i.e. because it's the Church teaching it, I am a Catholic, even if I am mistaken about the WHAT.  I think the Church teaches [this error], and so I believe it FOR THAT REASON.

Prots not only do not believe the right doctrines, but even the ones they DO believe, they believe for the wrong reasons, without the right rule of faith.

That is why the Church teaches that if you deny one dogma, you deny them all.  That's because you deny the authority behind ALL the dogmas, and whatever dogmas you still "believe", you don't believe them with the correct supernatural motive of faith but for your own reasons, making yourself (as St. Thomas points out) your own rule of faith.

In theory, you could have someone who believes every single dogma the Church has ever taught but simply have come to that conclusion due to their own reading of the Bible and their own interpretation.  Despite MATERIALLY believing everything, using the term "believe" loosely, since it's not supernatural faith at that point, they do not have the right FORMAL MOTIVE of faith, and therefore no faith.  No that this every happens in practice, but it's a hypothetical to illustrate the distinction.

It's the lack of such distinctions that causes many SVs to err, not distinguishing between the content of believe and the formal motive of faith, and failing to distinguish between the theological notes.
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Ladislaus on January 24, 2025, 10:05:12 AM
So, in a nutshell, you're basically saying I can go to the nearest Novus Ordo chapel for confession and be validly absolved of my sins as long as the priest is not a manifest heretic?

No.  I believe NO Holy Orders are doubtful, as I stated earlier.  Now, if you can find an older priest in the Roman Rite or an Eastern Rite priest, then, yes, the absolution would be valid.  And it would be valid even IF the priest is a manifest heretic.  I'm sure there were manifest heretic priests all over the place in the 1940s and 1950s Church, but their absolutions would still be valid.
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: cranefritter on January 24, 2025, 10:13:35 AM
Catholics who are not pertinacious heretics have the formal motive of faith, where they base their faith on the authority of the teaching Church, the Magisterium.  Protestants do not.  It has nothing to do with subjective sincerity.

Formal Motive refers not to WHAT I believe but WHY I believe it.

If I have the right WHY, i.e. because it's the Church teaching it, I am a Catholic, even if I am mistaken about the WHAT.  I think the Church teaches [this error], and so I believe it FOR THAT REASON.

Prots not only do not believe the right doctrines, but even the ones they DO believe, they believe for the wrong reasons, without the right rule of faith.

That is why the Church teaches that if you deny one dogma, you deny them all.  That's because you deny the authority behind ALL the dogmas, and whatever dogmas you still "believe", you don't believe them with the correct supernatural motive of faith but for your own reasons, making yourself (as St. Thomas points out) your own rule of faith.

In theory, you could have someone who believes every single dogma the Church has ever taught but simply have come to that conclusion due to their own reading of the Bible and their own interpretation.  Despite MATERIALLY believing everything, using the term "believe" loosely, since it's not supernatural faith at that point, they do not have the right FORMAL MOTIVE of faith, and therefore no faith.  No that this every happens in practice, but it's a hypothetical to illustrate the distinction.

It's the lack of such distinctions that causes many SVs to err, not distinguishing between the content of believe and the formal motive of faith, and failing to distinguish between the theological notes.
To clarify, the content in this case being V2 and the motive still being faith? NO adherents are therefore still Catholic due to their motive even if the content is incorrect?
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Everlast22 on January 24, 2025, 10:41:54 AM
With no legit authority from Rome, I would stick with what we do know before any of the Vatican 2 changes. Probably the best course of action. 

However, objective reality is now getting clearer and clearer that the fruits of Vatican 2 are harmful to ones soul.
The Catholic Church's teaching coming from the magisterium/Pope in Rome CANNOT be harmful to one's soul. (Whether a lay person knows it or not)
The counterfeits in Rome are harming souls every single time they open their mouth. 

Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Everlast22 on January 24, 2025, 11:27:28 AM
But that is the whole point of the poll. This forum is divided about if they have "legit authority" or not, and I am asking how it is possible that they do? The other polls demonstrate there is a MASSIVE disconnect in the brains of individuals who claim the N.O. is NOT The Catholic Church but a false religion, and one cannot belong to a false religion and still be Catholic, no heretics belong to the Church, etc. But then still somehow believe that the hierarchy of the N.O. is legit. They would like to use many distinctions, legalisms, specious arguments, subjective analysis, speculation, etc., to favor a paper-pope who is an "anti-Catholic heretic", but still true pope, and a College of Cardinals and local Ordinaries that are all onboard and always have been with the heresies of Vatican II (at least materially and in many cases formally). How can such a hierarchy be the true hierarchy of the Catholic Church? If you follow them - they will lead you to hell. R&R is trying to save face - the alternative is scary, and they shudder to think of the alternative - so they have to twist/wriggle to maintain the farce of having a more calming view of the situation and continue to perpetuate the false illusion that he N.O. is still somehow the Catholic Church.
maybe that's just it. Not recognizing and resisting IS scary. It's makes you into a pariah. The Latin Mass alone on Sunday doesn't make you a strong Catholic in any way shape or form. Ever notice how a lot of R&R's tend to be worldy for what they supposedly adhere to? 
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Meg on January 24, 2025, 05:50:59 PM
maybe that's just it. Not recognizing and resisting IS scary. It's makes you into a pariah. The Latin Mass alone on Sunday doesn't make you a strong Catholic in any way shape or form. Ever notice how a lot of R&R's tend to be worldy for what they supposedly adhere to?

How is it that being a Sedevacantist makes a Catholic less worldly? 
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Everlast22 on January 24, 2025, 06:34:19 PM
How is it that being a Sedevacantist makes a Catholic less worldly?
that's not what I was saying. 


....Meg
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: Gray2023 on January 27, 2025, 02:14:33 PM
I picked other because "No, they do not adhere to the Catholic Church, but they do hold office. (Thesis-ish)" was not quite what I would say. The problem is that some in the Novus Ordo do try to adhere to the Catholic Church despite the leaders, like the FFSP and ICK, (I know, some of their priests are traditional and some of their priests are modernist).

I think that what we need is a firm leader, who is fierce as a lion for Truth in public, but soft as a lamb when counseling individuals. (I stole that from how someone described +Williamson recently.)  All these ideas are interesting to discuss, but a future Pope will have a lot of work to do in putting the Catholic Church back in order.
Title: Re: Poll: Do the Novus Ordo clergy hold legitimate office in the Catholic Church?
Post by: hgodwinson on January 27, 2025, 06:10:36 PM
maybe that's just it. Not recognizing and resisting IS scary. It's makes you into a pariah. The Latin Mass alone on Sunday doesn't make you a strong Catholic in any way shape or form. Ever notice how a lot of R&R's tend to be worldy for what they supposedly adhere to?
Hey, can I just ask, worldly compared to whom? While I do think that trads need to stick up for their religion in the public forum more (you can count me among this number), I feel confident in saying that the only groups in the western world that are less worldly are the Amish. If we always degrade our fellow Catholics as worldly it may become a self fulfilling prophesy.