CathInfo.com

1. “To whatever extent pope, bishops, priests or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” (July 29, 1976, Reflections on the Suspension a divinis)

The above quote does not prove that +ABL believed as you do; not does it prove that he believed as Ladislaus does. 

1. “To whatever extent pope, bishops, priests or faithful adhere to this new Church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” (July 29, 1976, Reflections on the Suspension a divinis)

Notice that in the above quote, +ABL refers to the pope as the pope. He doesn't say that the chair is empty. And, to say that those who follow the new church separate themselves from the Catholic church, does not mean that +ABL is saying what you are saying. He doesn't accuse them of heresy and condemn them. He did not view the situation in the same way that you and Ladislaus do. 

Here are a few paragraphs from the last book written by +ABL, called, "Open Letter to Confused Catholics," page 175:

quote:

"I have not ceased repeating that if anyone separates himself from the Pope, it will not be I. The question comes down to this: the power of the Pope within the Church is supreme, but not absolute and limitless, because it is subordinate to the Divine authority which is expressed in Tradition, Holy Scripture, and the definitions already promulgated by the Church's magisterium. In fact, the limits of papal power are set by the ends for which it was given to Christ's Vicar on earth, ends which Pius IX clearly defined in the Constitution Pastor Aeternus of the First Vatican Council. So in saying this, I am not expressing a personal theory.

Blind obedience is not Catholic; nobody is exempt from the responsibility for having obeyed man rather than God if he accepts orders from a higher authority, even the Pope, when these are contrary to the Will of God as it is known with certainty from Tradition. It is true that one cannot envisage such an eventuality when the papal authority is engaged; but this happens only in a limited number of cases. It is an error to think that every word uttered by the Pope is infallible."

Yes, and they also made laws and pronouncements that heretics cannot hold any offices - which are based on Divine law and cannot be abrogated. Purely ecclesiastical laws can be abrogated or dispensed from if the means to follow them are not attainable.

I agree, but there are some things priests and lay people cannot do, one of those things is we cannot abrogate  the laws on papal elections. Although you need to disagree in order to maintain a vacant chair, the rest of the Church, thankfully, cannot do that because first, there is no reason to do that and second, because we are forbidden from doing that.

Weeeeeeeeeeeee round and round we go hurrrraayyyyyy!

So, I was wondering how long it would take us to come here... You NEED "hundreds of millions of souls" to be saved. This is your underlying reason for what you are doing.

Well, we keep going around because you keep avoiding and redirecting into circular, absurd arguments the points I am making - the bolded is the latest example of this.

Your opinion-turned-conclusion-turned de fide doctrine effects the whole Church. The whole Church consists of 100s of millions of souls, does it not? If your understanding of the "two are one head" is true, then Christ is just as guilty as the conciliar popes of scandalizing those hundreds of millions of souls who are all NO. 

That's point I was making, you ignored that point and redirected it to the absurd accusation that I "NEED hundreds of millions of souls to be saved."