All of these Plinio-worshipping/occult claims (which for some reason was recently "resurrected" in this thread in recent days) were disproven by Atila 35 years ago, when he published two books refuting them. Moreover, it is interesting that all of a sudden, you are raising up dust from 35 years ago, precisely when Atila put out his articles exposing the recent dishonest activities of SSPX/Fr. Purdy/Vox Catholica. Again, more sand in the eyes to have time to flee - this shows bad faith on your part.
Why all of the diversions? Here is the current issue at hand: Atila showed that Fr. Purdy - the self-proclaimed expert on the best translation of the Spanish devotion to Our Lady of Good Success - does not speak Spanish. Atila also showed that the docuмent put out by the nuns (which curiously has the same flavor of Fr. Purdy's sermons in Quito) made a serious mistake when it declared that the important feast of Feb. 2 is the Presentation (not the Purification). This goes against the tradition of the Church, as he showed through his quotes from Dom Gueranger, considered the best expert on liturgy in recent memory.
As I mentioned before: the more you bring up all these diversions (which are going on in about 7 threads now by the way), the more it seems like you are trying to cover for Fr. Purdy's lack of scholarship. Why not stop with these diversions? Let Fr. Purdy come forward and clarify all of this for his followers by:
1) Proving that he actually speaks Spanish.
2) Proving that his docuмent does not in fact contradict the tradition of the Church.
Until then, the more you bring up personal attacks against Atila/Plinio, the more you prove to the public that Fr. Purdy has nothing to say because he was caught in two frauds.