Author Topic: Pinay A 'Sede'? (Read 993 times)

roscoe · « **on:** December 20, 2008, 01:28:37 AM »

I am almost finished with my 4th reading of Plot Against The Church and have been to the Pinay Blog. It may be possible that the original authors did not comprehend that John 23 et al are heretics.

But I have been to http://www.mauricepinay.blogspot.com and an not quite sure where they stand on the dispute over who some of us see as anti-popes. In other words are they a 'sede' site? That is whether one interprets 'sede' as as constituted by either or both of two factors-- ones election is fraudulent or one is a an actual heretic and has deposed himself. Ciao

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** December 20, 2008, 01:31:05 AM »

Or was deposed as in the case of Boniface and a couple of others.

Dawn · « **Reply #2 on:** December 21, 2008, 11:43:10 AM »

This is a question I asked a few days ago. Up until recently I thought sede. They certainly point out the error of Judaism they are all steeped in.

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** December 21, 2008, 01:12:00 PM »

When you wondered about the site I thought it was a good question and deserved it's own topic. Have you read the book Plot Against The Church? It is overall quite informative but there are several mistakes of note.

I ran into something very interesting last night on pg 476

It says that the La Caballera Marrano family was 'related with Boniface'. It is not clear however if this specifically means Boniface 8.

Dawn · « **Reply #4 on:** December 22, 2008, 10:02:27 AM »

No, but I think it is on line for downloading. Boniface, was he another bad pontiff? Bet it on here somewhere else?

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #5 on:** December 22, 2008, 06:35:28 PM »

The gentleman who produces the blog is a sede. God speed.

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** December 22, 2008, 07:16:35 PM »

Thank you GV

Author Topic: Pinay A &#039;Sede&#039;? (Read 993 times)

Author Topic: Pinay A 'Sede'? (Read 993 times)