"the glory of the olive"
This is the last entry in St Malacy's prophecy and it pertains to the AGE of the Church. In other words, Benedict (of whom Francis is an extension of, being either a usurper of Benedict or simply an anti-pope altogether) is the last pope OF THE CURRENT AGE (i.e. 5th age of the Church).
St Malachy's prophecy started in the 1500s, which (according to Ven Holzhauser) was the beginning of the 5th age (i.e. the end of the high-Catholic Middle Ages, the start of the Renaissance, and the beginning of the rebellion against the Church, most notably with Martin Luther in 1517.)
I've read elsewhere that St Malachy's prophecy notably changes paragraphs/tone as it ends with the "Peter the Roman" line. In other words, "Peter the Roman" is a prophecy of the LAST POPE EVER, which is not related to the main list of popes, which are for a specific time period.
Back to Ven Holzhauser and his ages of the Church...the 5th age is a period of chaos, heresy and rebellion. The 6th age begins with the arrival of the Angelic Pope and Holy Monarch, who will usher in the 'Age of Mary' and Fatima's peace (however short).
Conclusion: St Malachy's prophecy was never meant as a list til the end of time, but only for a period of time, i.e. 5th age. Thus, his reference to "Peter the Roman" is meant as a reference to the very LAST pope (which other prophecies agree with, saying that the last pope vs antichrist will take Peter as his name). But there is no logical progression meant between 'glory of the olive' and 'peter the roman' as indicated by both the way it was written and also the change in paragraph/page of the manuscript, which meant to show a break of thought between ALL THE PRIOR POPES and the final one, i.e. Peter the Roman.
In reading St Malachy's prophecy in coordination with Ven Holzhauser (and many other prophecies), it is clear that Peter the Roman does NOT FOLLOW the 'glory of the olives'.