Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Period of peace (question for angelus)  (Read 14175 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 12531
  • Reputation: +7967/-2459
  • Gender: Male
Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2025, 10:12:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Angelus, you’re over complicating it.  The “period of peace” spoken of so often in prophecies means peace for the Church (ie a temporary freedom from heresy, from persecution, from major doctrinal disputes, from war, etc).  A temporary peace ON EARTH to worship God.  A peace so the Church can re-group, call a council, grow, catechize, etc. 

    Much like the peaceful time of Constantine, which took place after the first 3 centuries of persecutions.  It wasn’t the “garden of Eden”, but it was a peaceful time for the Church to grow, to organize the Biblical canon, to update liturgical rules, etc. 

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2330
    • Reputation: +880/-146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #16 on: March 18, 2025, 06:40:48 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • So is the period of peace eternity?

    Yes. Their is both a now, and not yet, to the kingdom of God. It is now, within us, via grace, and will finally come when the "last enemy," physical death, is conquered with Christ's return:


    Quote
    Luke 18:20-21

    20 And being asked by the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come? he, answering them, said: The kingdom of God cometh not with observation.


    21 Neither shall they say: Behold here, or behold there: for, lo, the kingdom of God is within you.

    Haydock Commentary

    Ver. 20. When the kingdom of God should come? or when is it to come? when will the Messias come? The Pharisees might say this in a mocking and an insulting manner, to signify that he could not be their true Messias. — The kingdom of God cometh not with observation; that it, so as to be observed; not with great marks of temporal power, as you imagine. (Witham) — The Pharisees expected a Messias powerful according to this world, a conqueror, a monarch, a revenger of the injuries of Israel; one who would restore them to liberty, and bless them with temporal goods and prosperity. In Jesus, they saw nothing, which corresponded to these magnificent hopes; and therefore asked him, by way of insult and reproach, when this kingdom of God would come, which he so often talked of and announced to his disciples. He answers them, that the manifestation of the Messias, and the establishment of his kingdom, shall not be effected in a conspicuous, splendid manner. It shall be brought about insensibly, and the accomplishment of the designs of the omnipotence of our Lord shall appear a casualty, and the effect of secondary causes. You shall not see the Messias coming at the head of armies, to spread terror and desolation. His arrival shall not be announced by ambassadors, &c. every thing in the establishment of my kingdom shall be the reverse of temporal power. (Calmet)

    1 Corinthians 15:24-26

    24 Afterwards the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God and the Father, when he shall have abolished all principality, and authority, and power.

    25 For he must reign, *until he hath put all his enemies under his feet.

    26 And the enemy, death, shall be destroyed last: *For he hath put all things under his feet. And whereas he saith,

    Haydock Commentary on I Cor. 24 etc.

    Ver. 24. &c. Afterwards the end; i.e. after the general resurrection of all, will be the end of the world. Then Christ shall deliver up his kingdom, as to this world, over all men, over the devil and his apostate angels, signified by principalities and powers; not but that Christ, both as God and man, shall reign for all eternity, not only over his elect but over all creatures, having triumphed by his resurrection over the enemy of mankind, the devil, over sin, and over death, which is as it were the last enemy of his elect. At the general resurrection, Christ will present these elect to his heavenly Father, as the fruits of his victory over sin and death; and though as man he came to suffer and die, and was also made subject to his eternal Father, yet being God as well as man, he is Lord of all, and will make his faithful servants partakers of his glory in his heavenly kingdom. (Witham)


    Christ reigns now, and has reigned spiritually via grace in His people since His Resurrection (the inner, spiritual peace - see Luke 18 above), and He will subject all of creation, all the politics and strife of this world and its kingdoms, to a material peace only upon His Second Coming.

    The Church has been spreading Our Lord's spiritual peace, dispensing grace, over all the earth since the Apostles set out with the divine commission laid upon them, converting souls (which is what this all about, souls). It has done its work, which I say is rather completed, as all the world has heard the Gospel.

    A Catholic Monarch? All nations Catholic and a temporal, worldly "peace and prosperity"? Nonsense, spreading like wild fire for the last hundred, hundred and fifty years in the Church, especially among Trads, who hold to old liturgical forms and most Catholic dogmas but fall subject to these wild, "Jєωιѕн fables" of an earthly kingdom in a material sense.

    Here's Cardinal Manning, when, after some 250 or so years of the Protestant revolt, things were bad, but he notes they will get worse until Christ's Return in victory, which He will establish personally with that Return:


    Quote
    4. Now, if I am obliged to enter somewhat into the future, I shall confine myself to tracing out a very general outline. The direct tendency of all the events we see at this moment is clearly this, to overthrow Catholic worship throughout the world. Already we see that every Government in Europe is excluding religion from its public acts.



    Manning, Archbishop Henry. The Present Crisis of the Holy See . Desert Will Flower iPress. Kindle Edition.

    When, I ask, was the Church of God ever in a weaker condition, in a feebler state in the eyes of men, and in this natural order, than it is now? And from whence, I ask, is deliverance to come? Is there on earth any power to intervene? Is there any king, prince, or potentate, that has the power to interpose either his will or his sword for the protection of the Church? Not one; and it is foretold it should be so. Neither need we desire it, for the will of God seems to be otherwise. But there is One Power which will destroy all antagonists; there is One Person who will break down and smite small as the dust of the summer threshing-floor all the enemies of the Church, for it is He who will consume His enemies “with the Spirit of His mouth,” and destroy them “with the brightness of His coming.” It seems as if the Son of God were jealous lest anyone should vindicate His authority. He has claimed the battle to Himself; He has taken up the gage which has been cast down against Him; and prophecy is plain and explicit that the last overthrow of evil will be His; that it will be wrought by no man, but by the Son of God; that all the nations of the world may know that He, and He alone, is King, and that He, and He alone, is God.


    Manning, Archbishop Henry. The Present Crisis of the Holy See . Desert Will Flower iPress. Kindle Edition.

    As Our Lord said:


    Quote
    Luke 18:8  I say to you, he will quickly avenge them. But yet, when the Son of man cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?

    Haydock Commentary

    Ver. 8. In the Greek, although he suffer for the present the elect to be oppressed. (Bible de Vence) — Our divine Redeemer adds, this, to shew that faith must necessarily accompany our prayers. For whosoever prays for what he does not believe he shall obtain, will pray in vain; let us, therefore, entreat the Father of mercies to grant us the grace of prayer, and firmness in faith; for faith produces prayer, and prayer produces firmness of faith. (St. Augustine, de verb. Dom. Serm 36.) — But of this there is little left on the earth, and there will be still less at the second coming of the Son of God.

    There's a pattern here, sowed by the "enemy," kin in its DNA to, "thou shalt not die." Only now it's a dream of a material peace on earth, a grand Catholic political/religious kumbaya paradise, a new Eden for "1,000 years."

    I'll oppose it and promote a real Traditional and Biblical sense that once prevailed among traditional Catholics in the Church holding to the faith of the fathers, not the "Jєωιѕн [though now professed by many Catholics] fables" of the last two hundred or so years.

    DR





    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.


    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #17 on: March 18, 2025, 07:57:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes. Their is both a now, and not yet, to the kingdom of God. It is now, within us, via grace, and will finally come when the "last enemy," physical death, is conquered with Christ's return:


    Christ reigns now, and has reigned spiritually via grace in His people since His Resurrection (the inner, spiritual peace - see Luke 18 above), and He will subject all of creation, all the politics and strife of this world and its kingdoms, to a material peace only upon His Second Coming.

    The Church has been spreading Our Lord's spiritual peace, dispensing grace, over all the earth since the Apostles set out with the divine commission laid upon them, converting souls (which is what this all about, souls). It has done its work, which I say is rather completed, as all the world has heard the Gospel.

    A Catholic Monarch? All nations Catholic and a temporal, worldly "peace and prosperity"? Nonsense, spreading like wild fire for the last hundred, hundred and fifty years in the Church, especially among Trads, who hold to old liturgical forms and most Catholic dogmas but fall subject to these wild, "Jєωιѕн fables" of an earthly kingdom in a material sense.

    Here's Cardinal Manning, when, after some 250 or so years of the Protestant revolt, things were bad, but he notes they will get worse until Christ's Return in victory, which He will establish personally with that Return:


    As Our Lord said:


    There's a pattern here, sowed by the "enemy," kin in its DNA to, "thou shalt not die." Only now it's a dream of a material peace on earth, a grand Catholic political/religious kumbaya paradise, a new Eden for "1,000 years."

    I'll oppose it and promote a real Traditional and Biblical sense that once prevailed among traditional Catholics in the Church holding to the faith of the fathers, not the "Jєωιѕн [though now professed by many Catholics] fables" of the last two hundred or so years.

    DR



    Well said. I think we are saying the same thing.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #18 on: March 18, 2025, 08:11:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Only now it's a dream of a material peace on earth, a grand Catholic political/religious kumbaya paradise
    Some of you are creating a major strawman. 

    - a "Material peace on earth" is not what Our Lady of Fatima is talking about, in her "period of peace".
    - a "religious kumbaya paradise" is not what Our Lady of Fatima is talking about, in her "period of peace".
    - a "protestant, "millenial type" reign of Christ is not what Our Lady of Fatima is talking about, in her "period of peace".

    The "period of peace" is nothing more than peace for the Church to worship without duress (V2). 
    -  Unlike the last 60 years, which has been filled with chaos. 
    -  Unlike the last 500 years which has been filled with protestant, anglican, heretical sects, all attacking doctrine and Truth (Martin Luther).
    -  Unlike the last 300 years which has been filled with infiltrations into the Clergy, Modernism and internal cleric bickering (French Revolution/freemasons).

    The Middle Ages was the height of Catholicism, especially the 13th century.  There was relative "peace" in this century.  Society was ordered around God, around prayer, and around achieving sanctity.  It produced some of the greatest saints of history.  Was it perfect?  No.  Did people still sin?  Of course.  But by and large, there was peace.

    Something akin to the Middle Ages, wherein the Church has a short (50-60 years, i.e. 1 generation) respite from Her present troubles and is able to recover from V2 and all that nonsense.  Not only is it prophecized repeatedly, and spoken of by most of the Church Fathers, but it just simply makes sense. 

    God is not a monster.  Persecutions/chaos like V2 is given to the Church for a reason, like the a pruning of the tree.  You don't cut the tree to hurt it; you trim it, so that it may produce more fruit.  The peaceful times which follow persecutions are the time for growth in the Church.  Look at history.

    A peaceful time for worshiping God doesn't mean some "utopian dream".  Most of Church history has been "peaceful".  I think some of you have PTSD and think that this whole V2 war/chaos is normal.  It's not and it will pass.  God is not a sadist who wants His Church to live through chaos, after chaos.  That's not normal.
     

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #19 on: March 18, 2025, 08:20:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Angelus, you’re over complicating it.  The “period of peace” spoken of so often in prophecies means peace for the Church (ie a temporary freedom from heresy, from persecution, from major doctrinal disputes, from war, etc).  A temporary peace ON EARTH to worship God.  A peace so the Church can re-group, call a council, grow, catechize, etc. 

    Much like the peaceful time of Constantine, which took place after the first 3 centuries of persecutions.  It wasn’t the “garden of Eden”, but it was a peaceful time for the Church to grow, to organize the Biblical canon, to update liturgical rules, etc. 

    Okay. You say so. Please provide the quotes from prophecies that speak of the "period of peace" that you are referring to. I want to read the description of that period in those prophecies that you are talking about.

    You say "the peaceful time of Constantine." Do you know what you are talking about? 

    Heard of the Arian Crisis? 
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arian_controversy

    How about the Donatists?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donatism

    All of these problems occurred during this "peaceful time" in and around Constantine. So if that is your definition of the "period of peace," then I don't disagree with you that it can happen in the end times. We are already there. But that is not the description of the "period of peace" in Holzhauser and other apocalyptic prophecies.

    Augustine explains that as long as the Church is on the "earthly pilgrimage" it will be a mixture, containing both the elements of the Earthly City and the City of God within it. Only upon Christ's return will the church ever have true peace. This is lack of peace is why were call the Church on Earth the "Church Militant."


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #20 on: March 18, 2025, 09:17:42 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Okay. You say so. Please provide the quotes from prophecies that speak of the "period of peace" that you are referring to. I want to read the description of that period in those prophecies that you are talking about.
    If such details existed, we wouldn't be having this debate.  :laugh1:  The prophecies outline a framework of what will happen.  Common sense (and Church history's prior examples) fill in the gaps.

    Quote
    You say "the peaceful time of Constantine." Do you know what you are talking about? 

    Heard of the Arian Crisis? 
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arian_controversy

    How about the Donatists?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donatism

    All of these problems occurred during this "peaceful time" in and around Constantine. So if that is your definition of the "period of peace," then I don't disagree with you that it can happen in the end times. We are already there. But that is not the description of the "period of peace" in Holzhauser and other apocalyptic prophecies.
    Compared to 300 years of being hunted down by Roman officials, treated like 4th world citizens, being fed to lions, and killed in various torturous ways, yes...the times of Constantine were quite peaceful.

    Quote
    Augustine explains that as long as the Church is on the "earthly pilgrimage" it will be a mixture, containing both the elements of the Earthly City and the City of God within it. Only upon Christ's return will the church ever have true peace. This is lack of peace is why were call the Church on Earth the "Church Militant."
    I agree.  I don't know where you heard that this "certain period of peace" which Our Lady of Fatima mentions is supposed to be some utopian dreamland where every person is a walking saint, where it never gets cold and puppies don't die. 

    The prophecies say the following, none of which is outlandish, or beyond reality, but is quite consistent with a restoration of the Church hierarchy and normal, human ways of restoring societal and ecclesiastical order.

    1.  When Russia is consecrated by a true pope, then Russia will convert and start defending the Church.
    a.  Many prophecies say this will happen during the midst of a war, which means that Russia will then start attacking the bad guys.
    b.  The war will be won by Christians and, due to the miraculous nature of this victory (similar to the miraculous victory of Constantine), the whole world will know that Our Lady is the cause, as God wills to honor Her and to have non-catholics recognize that She is the reason for the end of the war.

    2.  This dramatic end of the war and the dramatic conversion of Russia will cause countless non-catholics to convert to the Faith.  (Much like the miracle at Guadalupe converted 15 million souls).

    3.  The end of the war, which was fought by the Great Monarch-in-waiting, will coincide with the global disillusionment with the democratic form of govt (which is, on the whole, only a 200 year experiment) and a return to a Monarchical govt, worldwide. 
    a.  The democratic/republican/rule-of-the-people govt will be seen as the vehicle for the war, as it enabled the elites to corrupt the system and take control.
    b.  No form of govt is perfect, but as history shows, when a govt fails, the people often demand the opposite.  So, naturally, and also consistent with Church history, a return to a monarchy will coincide with a return to Church rule.

    4.  What follows during this "period of peace" is nothing more than a total, societal revamp/rebuild.
    a.  A rebuilding of Church order, structure, clergy, schools, churches, etc.
    b.  A Church council is called to denounce the errors of V2, protestantism, socialism, materialism, etc
    c.  The Church grows due to the influx of converts.  There is a renaissance of energy, piety and devotion.
    d.  Religious orders are restored, new ones begin and the religious life is renewed.
    e.  Family life is restored, because society is at peace and ordered, through the Church.

    5.  The global monarchy, as ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor, who works with the Angelic Pope, works to restore order throughout the world.
    a.  Nations which had never been catholic before (i.e. Middle East, Asia) are sent missionaries and churches/schools are built.
    b.  The whole world, generally speaking, is catholic.  (Not every single person).
    c.  There is order, there is peace, there is the worship of the Faith in all countries.

    This lasts for anywhere between 50-100 years.  Much like the "peace" of the 13th century.  There is nothing in the above that is fantastic, other than Our Lady's victory, which will be miraculous.  But the rebuilding of Catholicism and the work that it will take to restore the Church, will be normal, human efforts.  All of which are consistent and predictable according to history, which proves that after a political system (i.e. democracy) fails in utter disaster, that the opposite form of govt (i.e. monarchy) typically takes its place.  This is just human nature.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #21 on: March 18, 2025, 11:47:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • If such details existed, we wouldn't be having this debate.  :laugh1:  The prophecies outline a framework of what will happen.  Common sense (and Church history's prior examples) fill in the gaps.
    Compared to 300 years of being hunted down by Roman officials, treated like 4th world citizens, being fed to lions, and killed in various torturous ways, yes...the times of Constantine were quite peaceful.
    I agree.  I don't know where you heard that this "certain period of peace" which Our Lady of Fatima mentions is supposed to be some utopian dreamland where every person is a walking saint, where it never gets cold and puppies don't die. 

    The prophecies say the following, none of which is outlandish, or beyond reality, but is quite consistent with a restoration of the Church hierarchy and normal, human ways of restoring societal and ecclesiastical order.

    1.  When Russia is consecrated by a true pope, then Russia will convert and start defending the Church.
    a.  Many prophecies say this will happen during the midst of a war, which means that Russia will then start attacking the bad guys.
    b.  The war will be won by Christians and, due to the miraculous nature of this victory (similar to the miraculous victory of Constantine), the whole world will know that Our Lady is the cause, as God wills to honor Her and to have non-catholics recognize that She is the reason for the end of the war.

    2.  This dramatic end of the war and the dramatic conversion of Russia will cause countless non-catholics to convert to the Faith.  (Much like the miracle at Guadalupe converted 15 million souls).

    3.  The end of the war, which was fought by the Great Monarch-in-waiting, will coincide with the global disillusionment with the democratic form of govt (which is, on the whole, only a 200 year experiment) and a return to a Monarchical govt, worldwide. 
    a.  The democratic/republican/rule-of-the-people govt will be seen as the vehicle for the war, as it enabled the elites to corrupt the system and take control.
    b.  No form of govt is perfect, but as history shows, when a govt fails, the people often demand the opposite.  So, naturally, and also consistent with Church history, a return to a monarchy will coincide with a return to Church rule.

    4.  What follows during this "period of peace" is nothing more than a total, societal revamp/rebuild.
    a.  A rebuilding of Church order, structure, clergy, schools, churches, etc.
    b.  A Church council is called to denounce the errors of V2, protestantism, socialism, materialism, etc
    c.  The Church grows due to the influx of converts.  There is a renaissance of energy, piety and devotion.
    d.  Religious orders are restored, new ones begin and the religious life is renewed.
    e.  Family life is restored, because society is at peace and ordered, through the Church.

    5.  The global monarchy, as ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor, who works with the Angelic Pope, works to restore order throughout the world.
    a.  Nations which had never been catholic before (i.e. Middle East, Asia) are sent missionaries and churches/schools are built.
    b.  The whole world, generally speaking, is catholic.  (Not every single person).
    c.  There is order, there is peace, there is the worship of the Faith in all countries.

    This lasts for anywhere between 50-100 years.  Much like the "peace" of the 13th century.  There is nothing in the above that is fantastic, other than Our Lady's victory, which will be miraculous.  But the rebuilding of Catholicism and the work that it will take to restore the Church, will be normal, human efforts.  All of which are consistent and predictable according to history, which proves that after a political system (i.e. democracy) fails in utter disaster, that the opposite form of govt (i.e. monarchy) typically takes its place.  This is just human nature.

    Pax, I'm sorry to tell you, but what you have described as "the period of peace" is a "utopian dream." The 13th century was not such a period. The 13th century was a time of great turmoil in the Church and Europe. For example, St. Dominic founded the Dominican Order to combat the Albigensian heretics which were taking over parts of France. So, again, your narrative does not square with the facts.

    Beyond the historical problem, you are reading those prophecies too literally.

    Yes, there will be a kind of "peace," but not as you described. It will be a short "respite" in the middle of the end times "war." This "respite" will last a few months at most.

    The "respite" will be initiated by a supernatural intervention, the "Illumination" [illustratione] that comes from God [see 2 Thessalonians 2:8.] This will be the moment that the Antichrist is revealed as such to the entire world. The world will be stunned by the revelation. This event is also called "the Warning," because people will understand the depth of their sinfulness. It is described in more detail in Apocalypse 14:6-11. It is the last chance that God gives to the world before the final Wrath/Chastisement. 

    In the days and weeks following the miraculous "illumination," there will be a kind of "peace." There will be a mass conversion. But it will be transitory for most people. Very soon, many of the people who initially converted will begin to fall away again. Then the final stage of the end times will occur. This final period is described in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-11 with the reference to the "operation of error," the veil will be place on those who rejected the Truth after the "illumination."

    So the events and the kind of "peace" discussed by the prophecies will occur, but it will not be as you described, a lasting earthly peace in the geo-political sense that lasts for years. Instead, after the few weeks are finished, it will be the most intense persecution that the Church will have ever experienced. But God will accompany His saints through it until the end.

    To back up what I'm saying, I will give you an example of the "period of peace" described by Holzhauser:

    https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_57.html


    This is Ven. Holzhauser's interpretation of Chapter 10 of the Apocalypse featuring the great Angel who gives St. John a book to eat:

    Quote
    "The 'angel' is the Great Monarch: 'from heaven' means he will be a catholic: 'clothed in clouds' implies he will be humble and modest; 'rainbow' he will bring peace to the world; 'sunshine' refers to his wisdom, talents and title; 'feet' refers to his power and zeal; 'Open book' he will rule with justice 'Right and left foot' he will exercise power over all the world; 'Lion Voice' he will put fear into the wicked. The 'Golden Crown' refers to his Holy Roman Empire; 'Cutlass' means his victorious army; the other 'angel' refers to the pope (Angelic pastor). 'Other angels' are the other helpers of the Great Monarch who will help him crush the Turks…"

    Ven. Holzhauser begins his analysis by identifying the "mighty angel" mentioned in Apocalypse 10 with what he calls "the Great Monarch." So, should I assume that you agree with Holzhauser on this point of his interpretation?

    This "Great Monarch," says Holzhauser, "will bring peace to the world." And he will "exercise power over all the world." He reigns over "his Holy Roman Empire." I ask you, are those descriptions to be taken literally. Will a "literal man" do those things in a literal way? Will he be the "Holy Roman Emperor," literally?


    The answer is, no, not literally. Apocalyptic language is being used. These events will not take place literally as described.

    And if you will read the context of Apocalypse, Chapter 10, you will see that the period of "the Great Monarch" occurs in the middle of the end times tribulation, just before the martyrdom of the Two Witnesses. In fact, it is the "illumination" that provides the Two Witnesses with the confidence to perform their mission, which ends in their death and resurrection.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #22 on: March 18, 2025, 12:17:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    Pax, I'm sorry to tell you, but what you have described as "the period of peace" is a "utopian dream." The 13th century was not such a period. The 13th century was a time of great turmoil in the Church and Europe. 

    I'm not sure what history books you are reading, but they aren't the same ones I have read.  William Thomas Walsh calls the 13th the "Greatest of Centuries" in his book.  It was not called the "perfect century" or the "century where nothing bad happened".

    You have this strange either/or, binary view of the world.  There's always good and bad.  But the times of St Thomas, St Dominic or St Boneventure are INFINITELY more catholic than today.  Are you actually arguing that their times are "as bad" as now?  Seriously?


    Quote
    For example, St. Dominic founded the Dominican Order to combat the Albigensian heretics which were taking over parts of France. So, again, your narrative does not square with the facts.

    St Dominic died in 1221, at the beginning of the 13th century.  And did he defeat the Albigensians?  Yes.  Again, a "period of peace" does not mean 0% turmoil.  It means the Church is free to worship.  Free from persecutions; free from wars; free from major heresy.


    Quote
    This "Great Monarch," says Holzhauser, "will bring peace to the world." And he will "exercise power over all the world." He reigns over "his Holy Roman Empire." I ask you, are those descriptions to be taken literally. Will a "literal man" do those things in a literal way? Will he be the "Holy Roman Emperor," literally?
    Yep.  And not because Holzhauser said so, alone.  Because the same prophecies have been said since the times of the Church Fathers, all the way down through the centuries. 


    We've had 2 Holy Roman Empires previously.  And there will be a 3rd one, before antichrist comes on the scene.


    Quote
    The answer is, no, not literally. Apocalyptic language is being used. These events will not take place literally as described.
    Literally 100s of prophecies disagree with you.  Go read Dupont's "Catholic Prophecy" book.



    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #23 on: March 18, 2025, 12:57:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm not sure what history books you are reading, but they aren't the same ones I have read.  William Thomas Walsh calls the 13th the "Greatest of Centuries" in his book.  It was not called the "perfect century" or the "century where nothing bad happened".

    You have this strange either/or, binary view of the world.  There's always good and bad.  But the times of St Thomas, St Dominic or St Boneventure are INFINITELY more catholic than today.  Are you actually arguing that their times are "as bad" as now?  Seriously?


    St Dominic died in 1221, at the beginning of the 13th century.  And did he defeat the Albigensians?  Yes.  Again, a "period of peace" does not mean 0% turmoil.  It means the Church is free to worship.  Free from persecutions; free from wars; free from major heresy.

    Yep.  And not because Holzhauser said so, alone.  Because the same prophecies have been said since the times of the Church Fathers, all the way down through the centuries. 


    We've had 2 Holy Roman Empires previously.  And there will be a 3rd one, before antichrist comes on the scene.

    Literally 100s of prophecies disagree with you.  Go read Dupont's "Catholic Prophecy" book.

    Facts are facts. Major heretical movements inside the Church in the 13th century:

    1. Albigensian Crusade in France led by St. Dominic (1209–1229)
    2. Cathars of Lombardy who murdered St. Peter of Verona (1230s to 1252)
    3. Rise of the Fraticelli in Italy (1274)

    You gave the thirteenth century as an example of a "period of peace" for the Church, especially, and for the whole world. And you described it this way:

    Quote
    4.  What follows during this "period of peace" is nothing more than a total, societal revamp/rebuild.
    a.  A rebuilding of Church order, structure, clergy, schools, churches, etc.
    b.  A Church council is called to denounce the errors of V2, protestantism, socialism, materialism, etc
    c.  The Church grows due to the influx of converts.  There is a renaissance of energy, piety and devotion.
    d.  Religious orders are restored, new ones begin and the religious life is renewed.
    e.  Family life is restored, because society is at peace and ordered, through the Church.

    5.  The global monarchy, as ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor, who works with the Angelic Pope, works to restore order throughout the world.
    a.  Nations which had never been catholic before (i.e. Middle East, Asia) are sent missionaries and churches/schools are built.
    b.  The whole world, generally speaking, is catholic.  (Not every single person).
    c.  There is order, there is peace, there is the worship of the Faith in all countries.

    This lasts for anywhere between 50-100 years.  Much like the "peace" of the 13th century.

    This is a vision of a geo-political, social peace, an earthly peace that will not happen before the end of time. This is the exact same error the Jews made when they thought Jesus as a false Messiah. They thought this because Jesus did not fit their idea of a Messiah, the guy would was supposed bring peace and harmony to "the world." According to the Jews, he was to do this by the help of God and be a King himself over the whole world, literally. 

    They were sure that their interpretation was correct. And they rejected the true God who walked in their midst and then tortured him and killed Him. 

    Yes, in the end times, there will be a proposed peace. It will be a false, earthly geo-political solution to the problems of global society. It will be the false peace of the Antichrist.

    Don't forget what St. Paul about "peace and security" in 1 Thessalonians 5:

    Quote
    But of the times and moments, brethren, you need not, that we should write to you;  2 For yourselves know perfectly, that the day of the Lord shall so come, as a thief in the night.  3 For when they shall say, peace and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them, as the pains upon her that is with child, and they shall not escape. 4 But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.  5 For all you are the children of light, and children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #24 on: March 18, 2025, 01:08:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are twisting my words and you are practicing either-or/binary logic.

    If one had to rank the greatest Catholic century, then it would be the 13th.  It was 
    a.  the greatest period of saints, 
    b.  the most peaceful time, (fewest wars, fewest heresies, fewest religious squabbles)
    c.  the most christ-centered that society has ever been. 

    These 3 categories above ALL HAVE TO DO WITH RELIGION and SALVATION.  To equate the above with the "false/political peace hoped for by the Jews" is an idiotic and anti-catholic view.  You are basically arguing that if a catholic desires a "christian culture" (as in the Middle Ages) then he is the same as the Jews.  :facepalm::facepalm: 

    What are you smoking?

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #25 on: March 18, 2025, 02:16:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You are twisting my words and you are practicing either-or/binary logic.

    If one had to rank the greatest Catholic century, then it would be the 13th.  It was
    a.  the greatest period of saints,
    b.  the most peaceful time, (fewest wars, fewest heresies, fewest religious squabbles)
    c.  the most christ-centered that society has ever been. 

    These 3 categories above ALL HAVE TO DO WITH RELIGION and SALVATION.  To equate the above with the "false/political peace hoped for by the Jews" is an idiotic and anti-catholic view.  You are basically arguing that if a catholic desires a "christian culture" (as in the Middle Ages) then he is the same as the Jews.  :facepalm::facepalm: 

    What are you smoking?
    The Church Militant, the faithful on the earthly pilgrimage, will always be at "war" with "the world" to some degree. The 13th century is no different than many other centuries since Christ. It is a mixture of good and bad.

    But what is certain is that the saints and the Church during those times were not "at peace," in the true sense. The entire purpose of our life here on Earth is to prove ourselves for eternal life. The spiritual and material challenges we face, the sufferings we endure, these are the conditions under which saints are made. Yes, we all desire to live in peace. That is why we yearn for the promise of eternal life. 

    To desire "peace and security" in this world is understandable. Humans are naturally inclined to that sentiment. And if it is God's will that we live in such a time of relative earthly peace, we should embrace it, but we should not covet the things of this life. Here is how St. Augustine describes the relationship of the earthly peace and the heavenly peace:


    Quote
    Book XV 

    Chapter 4.—Of the Conflict and Peace of the Earthly City.

    But the earthly city, which shall not be everlasting (for it will no longer be a city when it has been committed to the extreme penalty), has its good in this world, and rejoices in it with such joy as such things can afford.  But as this is not a good which can discharge its devotees of all distresses, this city is often divided against itself by litigations, wars, quarrels, and such victories as are either life-destroying or short-lived.  For each part of it that arms against another part of it seeks to triumph over the nations through itself in bondage to vice.  If, when it has conquered, it is inflated with pride, its victory is life-destroying; but if it turns its thoughts upon the common casualties of our mortal condition, and is rather anxious concerning the disasters that may befall it than elated with the successes already achieved, this victory, though of a higher kind, is still only short-lived; for it cannot abidingly rule over those whom it has victoriously subjugated.  But the things which this city desires cannot justly be said to be evil, for it is itself, in its own kind, better than all other human good.  For it desires earthly peace for the sake of enjoying earthly goods, and it makes war in order to attain to this peace; since, if it has conquered, and there remains no one to resist it, it enjoys a peace which it had not while there were opposing parties who contested for the enjoyment of those things which were too small to satisfy both.  This peace is purchased by toilsome wars; it is obtained by what they style a glorious victory.  Now, when victory remains with the party which had the juster cause, who hesitates to congratulate the victor, and style it a desirable peace?  These things, then, are good things, and without doubt the gifts of God.  But if they neglect the better things of the heavenly city, which are secured by eternal victory and peace never-ending, and so inordinately covet these present good things that they believe them to be the only desirable things, or love them better than those things which are believed to be better,—if this be so, then it is necessary that misery follow and ever increase.

    True peace will never exist in a world characterized wickedness and lawlessness, i.e. this present world. The Freemasons desire a certain kind of earthly peace. But their peace is at the price of Truth of Jesus Christ. It is a false peace. Wokism is what we currently call it. This is the false peace of the Antichrist, and most of humanity will choose it over the real thing.

    As I said, there will be a short "respite" in the midst of the final few years of the end times. It will be the fulfillment of the prophecies of Ven. Holzhauser and others. But it is misunderstood by many Catholics who want to make it into something that it will not be. It will not be a years long geo-political peace in the world as we know it.

    And the Era of Peace referred to by Our Lady of Fatima is not some kind of relative, earthly peace. It will be the final triumph over Satan and sin and death. It is coming soon. Catholics looking forward with great hope and confidence to this True Peace, not a false dream of a "restored 13 century."





    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #26 on: March 18, 2025, 02:27:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    But what is certain is that the saints and the Church during those times were not "at peace," in the true sense.
    I've defined what I mean by "peace" multiple times.  You continue to re-define it and then debate the re-defined word.  This is the definition of an logical fallacy known as a "strawman".

    There's no sense in continuing the conversation.  You're not replying to what I wrote; you're replying to some warped revision of my thoughts.

    Offline Angelus

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1198
    • Reputation: +509/-99
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #27 on: March 18, 2025, 03:14:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I've defined what I mean by "peace" multiple times.  You continue to re-define it and then debate the re-defined word.  This is the definition of an logical fallacy known as a "strawman".

    There's no sense in continuing the conversation.  You're not replying to what I wrote; you're replying to some warped revision of my thoughts.

    You sure did define it, and it is like no period that we know of in world history:

    1. "a total, societal revamp/rebuild."

    2. "society is at peace and ordered"

    3. "The global monarchy, as ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor, who works with the Angelic Pope, works to restore order throughout the world."

    4.  "There is order, there is peace, there is the worship of the Faith in all countries."

    5. "This lasts for anywhere between 50-100 years."

    Sounds like the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr with a Catholic spin. It's a deception. Don't fall for it. Only God will save us. We don't save ourselves. That is why He has to come back to reveal and slay the Antichrist [2 Thessalonians 2:8]. 

    In the meantime, watch and pray.



    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12531
    • Reputation: +7967/-2459
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #28 on: March 18, 2025, 03:32:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    You sure did define it, and it is like no period that we know of in world history:

    1. "a total, societal revamp/rebuild."

    2. "society is at peace and ordered"

    3. "The global monarchy, as ruled by a Holy Roman Emperor, who works with the Angelic Pope, works to restore order throughout the world."

    4.  "There is order, there is peace, there is the worship of the Faith in all countries."

    5. "This lasts for anywhere between 50-100 years."
    All of this happened, on a smaller scale, during the Middle Ages, when Europe was 100% catholic.

    The main difference between the near future and the Middle Ages, is that Asia/Middle East will finally convert.  The Americas (north and south) have been converted for centuries.  Our Lady has told us that Russia/Orthodox will reconvert.  All that's left is Asia/Middle East to come to the Faith.  Why is this some type of "conspiracy"?  :laugh1:

    Quote
    Sounds like the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr with a Catholic spin. It's a deception. Don't fall for it.
    :facepalm:  It's not a deception when (many if not all) the Church Fathers say that the whole world will be catholic (and there will be a 3rd Holy Roman Empire) before the arrival of antichrist.

    That is what St Paul meant by "the great falling away".  The whole world is (generally, societally) catholic and then it falls to antichrist.  St Paul's warning can't apply to today because over 50% of the world isn't even catholic anymore.  What kind of "falling away" is that?  St Paul's warning is of a monumental number of people are deceived by antichrist.  If less that 50% of world isn't even catholic, what are they "falling away" from?  Answer:  They've already fallen away before antichrist even arrived.  This makes no sense.

    You act like this is some new thing.  It's not. 

    Go read the Church Fathers and get some positivity in your life.  You're much too doom-n-gloom.  You act as if God is a sadist who only gives the Church persecutions and suffering.

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2330
    • Reputation: +880/-146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Period of peace (question for angelus)
    « Reply #29 on: March 18, 2025, 04:13:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sounds like the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr with a Catholic spin. It's a deception. Don't fall for it. Only God will save us. We don't save ourselves. That is why He has to come back to reveal and slay the Antichrist [2 Thessalonians 2:8].

    In the meantime, watch and pray.

    Spot on. And Amen. 
    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.